EVALUATION OF USING A COMBINATION OF SIMULATED AND EXPERIMENTAL DATA TO PREDICT DRAFT FORCE OF A MOLDBOARDPLOW | ||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||
| Article 1, Volume 30, Issue 1, January 2013, Pages 1-28 PDF (1.26 M) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2013.102082 | ||
| Author | ||
| Abdulwahed M. Aboukarima1, 2 | ||
| 1Researcher, Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Agriculture Research Centre | ||
| 2Assistant Professor at Shaqra University, Saudi Arabia. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Information is required on draft force for tillage implements as it plays an important role in design and development of such implements.Due to the complexity of draft force prediction models of the moldboard plow, there is a need to develop a simple draft prediction model of the moldboard plow, as affected by soil properties and working conditions. In this research, two models were implemented. The first one was by artificial neural network (ANN) and the second was by a multiple linear regression (MLR). The required draft data were obtained by the available Excel spreadsheet. The soil parameters required in the spreadsheet were obtained from experimental work at different sitesin Saudi Arabia. For generating draft data, the plowing depths and the plowing speeds were assumed. All combinations were addressed and the total data were 2268 rows. However, 2172 rows were used to build the ANN and MLR models for predicting draft of a moldboard plow. Meanwhile, 96 data points were used to test the models. The mean relative error (MRE) between simulated and predicted values, using regression draft equation and ANN model were 1.86% and -8.966%, respectively during testing phase. The performance of the two models was validated by a field experiment data and points from literature. MRE values between measured and predicted values of validation data using field data were 5.19% and 12.32% when using ANN and MLR models, respectively. The encouraging results can push to utilize the developed models to be a tool for evaluation in farm machinery management process. | ||
| References | ||
|
Abas, H., A. Iman and A. Masoumi (2008). Effect of plow share type on moldboard plow performance under different moisture contents and plowing depths. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 39(1):87-97.
Aboukarima, A. M. (2007). Draft models of chisel plow based on simulation using artificial neural networks. Misr J. Ag. Eng., 24(1): 42-61.
Aboukarima, A.M. (2004). Artificial neural networks configuration for predicting performance of tillage implements under Egyptian conditions. PhD Thesis, Agric. Eng. Dept., Faculty of Agric., Ain Shams University, Egypt.
Aboukarima, A.M. and A.F. Saad (2006). Assessment of different indices depicting soil texture for predicting chisel plow draft using neural networks. Alexandria Science Exchange J., 27(2): 170-180.
Aboukarima, A.M., M.N. El Awady, A.G. El Kabany and M.H.A. Kabeel (2003). Plows performance under Egyptian conditions depicted by artificial neural networks. Misr J. Agric. Eng., 20 (4): 919-936.
Al-Janobi, A., S. Al-Hamed and A.M. Aboukarima (2010). An excel spreadsheet to estimate performance parameters for chisel plow-tractor combination based on trained an artificial neural network. Bulletin USAMV Agriculture, 67(2):1-9.
Al-Janobi, A.A. and S.A. Al-Suhaibani (1998). Draft of primary tillage implements in sandy loam soil. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 14(4):343– 348.
Al-Janobi, A.A., A.M. Aboukarima and K.A. Ahmed (2001). Prediction of specific draft of different tillage implements using neural networks. Misr J. Agric. Eng., 18 (3): 669-714.
Aluko, O.B. and D.A. Seig (2000). An experimental investigation of the characteristics of and conditions for brittle fracture in two-dimensional soil cutting. Soil & Tillage Research, 57:143-157.
Arvidsson, J. And O. Hillerstrom (2010). Specific draft, soil fragmentation and straw incorporation for different tine and share types. Soil & Tillage Research, 110:154–160.
Arvidsson, J., T. Keller and K. Gustafsson (2004). Specific draft for moldboard plow, chisel plow and disc harrow at different water contents. Soil & Tillage Research, 79:221–231.
ASAE Standards (1984). ASAE D203.4: agricultural machinery management data. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI, pp. 213–220.
ASAE Standards (1997). ASAE D497.3: agricultural machinery management data. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI, pp.363–370.
Chung, S.O., K.A. Sudduth, C.Plouffe and N.R. Kitchen (2008). Soil bin and field tests of an on-the-go soil strength profile sensor. Transaction ASABE, 51:5-18.
El Awady, M.N., A.G. El Kabany, M.H.A. Kabeel, and A.M. Aboukarima (2003). Relative importance of variables affecting chisel-plow performance using neural networks. The 11th Conf. of Misr Society Agric. Eng., 15-16 October, Rice Mech. Centre, Meet El Deeba, Kafer El Sheikh Governorate: 395-407.
El Awady, M.N., A.G. El Kabany, M.H.A. Kabeel and A.M. Aboukarima (2004). Predicting unit draft of tillage implements using statistical models and neural networks. The 12th Conf. of Misr Society Agric. Eng., 15-16 October, Alexandria Univ.: 139-249.
El Khadrawy, A.A. (1990). Estimating of used energy in the production of some Egyptian crops. M.Sc. Th., Agric. Mech. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Mansoura Univ.: 71-140.
Elbanna, E.B. (1989). Prediction of specific moldboard plow draft. J. Agric. Sci. , Mansoura Univ., 15 (2):253-265.
Elbanna, E.B. (1992). Tillage tools draft: chisel and moldboard plows. Misr J. Ag. Eng., 9 (4): 491-510.
Formato, A., S. Faugno and G. Paolillo (2005). Numerical simulation of soil-plow moldboard interaction. Biosystems Engineering, 92 (3):309–316.
Gebresenbet, G., E.Zerbini, A. Astatke and P. Kaumbutho (1997). Optimization of animal drawn tillage implement systems: Part2, development of a reversible plow and a ridger. J. agric. Engng Res.,67:299-310.
Gee-Clough, D., M. McAllister, G. Pearson and D.W. Evernden (1978). The empirical prediction of tractor – implement field performance. J. of Terramechanics, 15(2):81-94.
Gill, W. R. and G. F. Van Den Berg (1968). Soil dynamics in tillage and traction. Agricultural Handbook 316, Washington D. C.; USDA Agricultural Research service.
Godwin, R.J., G. Spoorad and P. Leeds-Harrison (1981). An experimental investigation into the force mechanics and resulting solid disturbance of mole plow. J. agric. Engng. Res., 26: 477-497.
Godwin, R.J., M.J. O’Dogherty, C.Saunders and A.T. Balafoutis (2007). A force prediction model for moldboard plows incorporating the effects of soil characteristic properties, plow geometric factors and plowing speed. Biosystems Engineering, 97:117–129.
Harrigan, T.M. and C.A. Rotz (1995). Draft relationships for tillage and seeding equipment. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 11(6):773–783.
Hassan, A.E. and A.S.Tohmaz (1995). Performance of skidder tires in swamps-comparison between statistical and neural network models. Transaction ASAE, 38 (5): 1545-1551.
Huijsmans, J. F. M., J. G. L. Hendriks and G. D. Vermeulen (1998). Draft requirement of trailing-foot and shallow injection equipment for applying slurry to grassland. J. agric. Engng Res., 71:347-356.
Imara, Z.M.I. (1996). Development a combined machine for primary and secondary tillage under local conditions. PhD Thesis, Agric. Mech. Dept., Faculty of Agric., Tanta Univ., Kafer El-Sheikh:210-227.
KarimiInchebron, A., S. R. M. Seyedi and R. T. Koloor (2012). Investigating the effect of soil moisture content and depth on the draft, specific draft and drawbar power of a light tractor. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 3 (11): 2289-2293.
Khadr, K. A. A. (2008). Effect of some primary tillage implement on soil pulverization and specific energy. Misr J. Ag. Eng., 25(3): 731-745.
Kheiralla, A.F., A. Yahya, M. Zohadie and W. Ishak (2004). Modelling of power and energy requirements for tillage implements operating in Serdang sandy clay loam, Malaysia. Soil & Tillage Research, 78:21–34.
Kushwaha, R.L. and Z. X. Zhang (1997). Artificial neural networks modeling of soil-tool interaction.ASAE Paper No. 97-3067, ASAE, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA: 1-11.
Manuwa, S.I. and Ogunlami M.O. (2010). Soil-tool interaction modeling of parameters of soil profile produced by tillage tools. J. Eng. and Applied Sci. , 5:91-95.
Mouazen, A. M., R. Herman and De B. Josse (2003). Modeling compaction from on-line measurement of soil properties and sensor draft. Precision Agriculture, 4 (2): 203-212.
Mouazen, A.M and H. Ramon (2002). A numerical-statistical hybrid modeling scheme for evaluation of draft requirements of a subsoiler cutting a sandy loam soil, as affected by moisture content, bulk density and depth. Soil & Tillage Research, 63 (3-4): 155-165.
Mouazen, A.M. and M. Neményi (1998). Review of the finite element modeling techniques of soil tillage. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 48: 23-32.
Nadre, R.G. and R.K. Datta (1991). Investigation on forces in three-point linkage of tractor. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, India Society of Agricultural Engineering, Vol. XXVIII, Nos. 1 To 4:254-260.
Oskoui, K. E. and B. D. Witney (1982). The determination of plow draft, part 1: prediction from soil and meteorological data with cone index as the soil strength parameter. J. of Terramechanics, 19: 97–106.
Oskoui, K. E., D. H. Rackham and B. D. Witney (1982). The determination of plow draft: part 2, the measurement and prediction of plow draft for two moldboard shapes in three soil series. J. of Terramechanics, 19: 153–154.
Oskoui, K.E. and S.J. Harvey (1992). Predicting cone index from soil physical properties and organic matter content. ASAE Paper No.92-1056, ASAE St. Joseph, Mich., USA:1-16.
PAES (2001). Philippine Agricultural Engineering Standard (PAES 121: 2001 Agricultural Machinery – Disk Plow – Specifications, 9 p.
Rahman, A., R.L. Kushawaha, S.R. Ashrafizadeh and S. Panigrahi (2011). Prediction of energy requirement of a tillage tool in a soil bin using artificial neural network. ASABE Paper No. 111112. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA.Roul, A.K., H. Raheman, M.S. Pansare and R. Machavaram (2009). Prediction of draft requirement of tillage implements in sandy clay loam soil using an artificial neural network. Biosystems Engineering, 104(4): 476-485.
Sahu, R.K. and H. Raheman (2006). Draft prediction of agricultural implements using reference tillage tools in sandy clay loam soil. Biosystems Engineering, 94 (2):275–284.
Shirgure P. S. and G. S. Rajput (2011). Evaporation modeling with neural networks–A Research review. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Soft and Intelligent Computing (IJRRSIC), 1(2):37-47. Shrestha, D. S., G. Singh and G. Gebresenbet (2001). Optimizing design parameters of a moldboard plow.J. agric. Engng Res., 78 (4): 377-389.
Summers, J.D., A. Khalilian and D.G. Batchelder (1986). Draft relationships for primary tillage in Oklahoma soils. Transaction ASAE, 29(1):37-39.
Tohmaz, A.S. and A. E. Hassan (1995). Application of artificial neural networks to skidder traction performances. J. of Terramechanics, 32 (3): 105-114.
Tong, J. and B. Z. Moayad (2006). Effects of rake angle of chisel plow on soil cutting factors and power requirements: A computer simulation. Soil & Tillage Research, 88 (1-2): 55-64.
Vesta Services (2000). Vesta Services, Inc. Qnet2000 Shareware, Vesta Services, Inc., 1001 Green Bay Rd, STE 196, Winnetka, IL 60093.
Ward, M.I. and A.I. Moussa (1997). A comparative study of different tillage methods for optimizing corn production.5th Conf. of Misr Society of Agr. Eng., 9th Sept.1997:173-180.
Zhang, D., Q. Jiang and X. Li (2005). Application of neural networks in financial data mining. International Journal of Computational Intelligence, 1:106-109.
Zhang, Z.X. and R. L. Kushawaha (1999). Application of neural networks to simulate soil-tool interaction and soil behaviour. Canadian Agricultural Engineering, 41(2): 119-125. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 199 PDF Download: 362 |
||
