SOME ENGINEERING PROPERTIES OF DIFFERENT FEED PELLETS | ||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||
| Article 12, Volume 28, Issue 4, October 2011, Pages 947-960 PDF (493.24 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2011.102604 | ||
| Authors | ||
| A. H. Bahnasawy1; H. M. Mostafa2 | ||
| 1Associate. Prof., Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agric., Benha University, Egypt. | ||
| 2Lecturer, Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agric., Benha University, Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Due to lack of information about the physical and mechanical properties of feed pellets which are very important to understand the behavior of the product during the processing operations such as transporting, packaging and storage processes and also, it is necessary in processing operations. The main objective of this work was to study the physical and mechanical properties to form an important database for four of the most popular feed pellets in Egypt. These properties include: linear dimensions, mean diameter, surface area, volume, mass, density, static friction coefficient, repose angle and crushing load. The engineering parameters results showed that the length and mean diameters were in the range of 0.50-2.44 and 0.40-1.24 cm for all pellet sizes with CV of 12-33 and 2-3 %. Feed pellet types in all sizes were cylindrical in shape. The surface areas ranged from 0.86-11.95 cm2 and the feed pellet mass ranged from 0.07-3.01 g depending on the feed pellet size. The volume ranged from 0.06-2.96 cm3 with CV of 11-31%, the bulk density ranged from 0.64-0.74 g/cm3 with CV of 23-36% and real density ranged from 1.02-1.15 g/cm3 with CV of 9-14% for all feeds. The repose angle ranged from 25.67-38.7o. The coefficient of static friction (C.S.F) ranged from 0.48-0.80 for all sizes and surfaces. The highest C.S.F was offered by concrete surface followed by the plywood and the galvanized steel surfaces. Crushing load increased with the pellet size ranged from 90.74 to 454.13 and from 29.5 to 348.35 N in vertical and horizontal position, respectively, depending on the feed pellet size. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Feed pellets; Physical; Mechanical; Properties; Repose angle; Crushing load; Friction coefficient | ||
| References | ||
|
Aarseth, K.A. and E. Prestlokken. 2003. Mechanical Properties of Feed Pellets: Weibull Analysis. Biosystems Engineering: 84 (3): 349–361
Appel, W.B. 1985. Physical Properties of Feed Ingredients. Feed Manufacturing Technology IIl. pp 557-562 American Feed Industry Association. Arlington VA.
ASAE Data: ASAED241.3.1987. Density, specific gravity, and weight moisture relationships of grain for storage. ASAE Standards 1987 : 298-305.
ASAE standard 1984. ASAE 5352.1. moisture measurement. American Society of Agric. Eng. 2950 Niles Road, st. Joseph, MI 49085-9659.
Behnke, K. C. 1996. Feed manufacturing technology: current issues and challenges. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 62(1): 49–57
Chen, Y., Beveridge, M., and Telfer, T. (1999a). Physical characteristics of commercial pelleted atlantic salmon feeds and consideration of implications for modeling of waste dispersion through sedimentation. Acquaculture Int., 7:89–100.
Elberizon, I. and Kelly, L. (1998). Settling measurements of parameters critical to modelling benthic impacts of freshwater salmonid cage aquaculture. Acquaculture Research, 29:669–677.
Fasina, O. O. and S. Sokhansanj .1996. Effect of fines on storage and handling properties of alfalfa pellets. Canadian Agricultural Engineering, 38(1): 25–29
Findlay, R. and Watling, L. (1994). Toward a process level model to predict the effects of salmon net-pen aquaculture on the benthos. In Modeling Benthic Impacts of Organic Enrichment from Marine Aquaculture, Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1949: xi + 125 p. B.T. Hargrave.
Ghazavi, M; M. Hosseini and M. Mollanouri. 2008. A Comparison between Angle of Repose and Friction Angle of Sand. The 12th International Conference of International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG)1-6 October, 2008, Goa, India
Kammel, D.W. 1991. Physical characteristics of alternative feeds. Page 111 in Proceedings of the First National Alternative Feeds Symposium. MU Conference Office.
Mohsenin, N. N. 1970. Physical properties of plant and animal materials. New York, Gordon and Breach, Sc. Pub. Pp, 51-87, 889.
Mostafa, H and Adel H. Bahnasawy. 2009. Developing an appropriate system for onion grading. ISBN-NR. 978-3-639-20266-3. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG, Pub. Germany.
Oje, K. and E. C. Ugbor. 1991. Some physical properties of oil bean seed. J. Agric. Engng Res. 50, 305-313.
Payne, J; W. Rattink; T. Smith; T. Winowiski .1994. The Pelleting Handbook. Borregaard Lignotech, Windsor
Thomas, M. and B. van der Poel .1996. Physical quality of pelleted animal feed. 1. Criteria for pellet quality. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 61(1–4): 89–112
Thomas, M and van D. J. Zuilichem and B. van der Poel .1997. Physical quality of pelleted animal feed. 2. Contribution of processes and its conditions. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 64(2–4), 173–192
Thomas, M.; J. Huijnen; T. van Vliet; J. van Zuilichem and B. van der Poel. 1999. Effects of process conditions during expander processing and pelleting on starch modification and pellet quality of tapioca. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 79(11): 1481–1494 | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 432 PDF Download: 886 |
||
