A LOCAL MACHINE FOR CONSTRUCTION GRAVEL-FILLING MOLES TO ENHANCE RECLAMATION PROCESSES OF SALT-AFFECTED SOILS | ||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||
| Article 6, Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011, Pages 336-351 PDF (483.63 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2011.105098 | ||
| Author | ||
| M. I. H. Ward | ||
| High Institute of Efficient Productivity, Zagazig University, Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Heavy clay slat-affected soils due to their dense nature and bad physical and chemical properties have very low rates of solute and water movement. Thus these soils required long periods of time and high costs for reclamation. In a trying to enhance leaching efficiency through improving internal drainage of these soils; a local machine has been developed to construct gravel-filling mole drains. The machine performance was evaluated in a field study conducted in a clay saline sodic soil, during summer season 2009, at the Experimental Farm of the High Institute of Efficient Productivity, Zagazig Univ. The specific objectives were to: (1) evaluate the construction and gravel-filling performance of moles at three different depths of 30, 45 and 60 cm, three construction spacing 2, 3,and 4m under four machine forward speed 4, 4.5, 5, and 6 Km.h-1, and (2) ameliorating role of moling in terms of their beneficial effects on soil infiltration rate (IR), and soil salinity and sodicity expressed as total soluble salts (ECe), and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), respectively. The obtained data showed that at mole depth about 60 cm and 2m mole space, the machine actual field capacity and the percentage of tractor wheel slip were increased by about 28%and 120% respectively when the machine forward speed change from 4 to 6 km.h-1. While the energy requirements and mole filling efficiency were decreased (about 22%, and 5% resp.). Increasing the mole construction depth from 30 to 60 cm caused significant decrease in AFC by about 5%, non significant increase in operation costs, and highly significant increase of energy requirements by about 158%. Also, the mole filling efficiency, and tractor wheel slip percentage by about 6% and 65% respectively at machine speed 4.5 km.h-1 and 2 m mole space. The IR significantly increased by about 43% when the mole space decreasing from 4 to 2 m, and in turn caused highly significant improving in both soil salinity and its sodicity. The EC and SAR were decreased by about 57 and 60%, respectively. On the other side, IR was highly significant decreased (about 47%) when the moling depth increased from 30 cm to 60 cm and high significantly increased in both soil salinity (EC) and its sodicity (SAR) by about 27% and 49 % respectively. | ||
| References | ||
|
Abou El Soud,M. A., Ghazy, M.A., Shams El- Din, H.A., and El- Abaseri, H.A. 1996.Sand filled mole drain installation for improvement of soil properties. Misr J. Ag. Eng., CairoUniv. Irr. Conf., April 1996.pp. 88 – 99.
Abdel-Dayem, M.S. 1986. A comparative study on the use of PVC and PE in manufacturing corrugated drainage tubing. Ministry of Irrigation, Water Research Center, Drainage Research Institute, Technical Report 53. Giza, Egypt, 24 p.
Boers, T.M. and C.L. van Someren 1998. Design of gravel envelope for silty and fine sandy soils in Pakistan. In: J. Wesseling (ed.), Proceedings of the International Drainage Workshop. ILRI, Wageningen, pp. 192 -199
Bowers, C. G. Jr. 1995. Tillage draft and energy measurements for twelve southwestern soil series. Transaction of ASAE. 32 (5). 1492 – 1502
Brady and Weil 2001. Fuller and R.B. Bonnell 1992. Water conveyance capacity of corrugated plastic drain pipe with internal diameters between 38 and 75 mm. Proceedings of the 6th International Drainage Symposium. NashvilleTennessee, American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE), St. Joseph, pp.
Dierickx, W. 2003. Research and developments in selecting drainage materials, Irrigation and Drainage Systems, Vol. 6, No. 4,pp. 291-310
Garcia, I. 1978. Soil Water Engineering Laboratory Manual Dept. of Agric. and Chem., Colorado State Univ. Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Godwin, R.J., G. Spoor, P.B. Leeds-Harrison 1998. An experimental investigation into the force mechanics and resulting soil disturbance of mole ploughs. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 26, pp. 477-479.
Jackson, M.L. (1958). Soil Chemical Analysis. Constable and Co. Ltd., London
Moustafa, M. K. H., M. M. Moukhtar and A. El Gayer 1990. Preferential water flow and salt leached in salty clay soil’ Egypt. J. Appl. Sci. 5:228:235
Moukhtar, M.M., Madiha, H. E., A.S. Abdel-Mawgoud, , A. N Abdel-Aal, M. B. El Shewikh, and M.I.I. Abdel-Khalik, 2010. Drainage and role of mole drains for heavy clay soils under saline water table. Egypt. Paper No 078. Presented at the 9th International Drainage Workshop, September 10 – 13, 2010, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Scheifer, H. 2005.Problems arising from draining heavy soils and the introduction of measure to improve the functioning of the drainage system . Drainage of heavy soils, pp 6AO, Rome.
Smedema, L.K. and D.W. Rycroft 1998. Land drainage: planning and design of agricultural drainage. Soil Conservation Service 1991. National Engineering Handbook 23 Drainage of Agricultural Land. U.S. pp. 348-353.
Sommerfeldt, J.G. and C. Chang 2001. Desalinization of an irrigated, mole-drained saline clay loam soil Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 67, pp. 263-269.
Spoor. G., R.J. Godwin and S.M. Miller 2004. Mole plough grade control. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 38, pp. 145- 166.
Tanton, T. W., D. W. Rycroft and F. M. Wilkinson (2000). The leaching of salts from saline heavy clay soils: Factors affecting the leaching process. Soil use and Management 4 (4): 133- 139.
Thomas, D.W., H. Garner, and J. W. Davis 1981. Tillage mechanical energy input and soil crop response. Transaction of ASAE(1981). 1412- 1425 | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 128 PDF Download: 183 |
||
