Short Term Outcomes of Lichtenstein Hernioplasty Versus Desarda Technique in Repair of Inguinal Hernia | ||
| SVU-International Journal of Medical Sciences | ||
| Article 6, Volume 2, Issue 2, July 2019, Pages 31-37 PDF (170.61 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original research articles | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/svuijm.2019.122261 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Aya M. Selim* ; Mohamed K. Elamary; Mohamed Y. Ahmed; Mohammed A. Omar | ||
| General Surgery Department, Qena Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Background: The Desarda repair technique of inguinal hernia repair introduced in 2001 is still not considered standard tissue based hernia repair technique. We compared the tissue based Desarda technique with standard Lichtenstein repair in treatment of primary inguinal hernia. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the short term outcomes of Desarda technique versus Lichtenstein hernioplasty in inguinal hernia repair. Patients and methods: A total of 81 participants (41 in the Lichtenstein arm and 40 in the Desarda arm) were enrolled into this single centre double-blind randomised controlled trial. The outcome measures were evaluated at 1–2 h, 3, 7 and 14 days. The primary outcomes measured were recurrence and chronic pain. In addition to early and late complications, foreign body sensation, and return to everyday activity which examined and evaluated in hospital after surgery. Results: During one year follow up, no recurrence was detected in each group . Chronic groin pain was experienced by 5.6% and 4.2% of patients from Desarda and Lichtenstein groups respectively (P = 0.68). There was no significant statistical difference in mean postoperative VAS scores for pain at the five time points between the two study groups. There was significantly shorter operating time and earlier return to normal gait in favor of Desarda repair. Foreign body sensation was not different between the two groups.. Conclusions: Successful inguinal hernia treatment without mesh implantation can be achieved using Desarda repair, as it is effective as the standard Lichtenstein procedure. Shorter operating time, early return to normal gait and lower cost (no mesh) are potential benefits of Desarda repair. The suitability of Desarda repair for patients found to have thin, weak or divided external oblique aponeurosis intraoperatively needs further evaluation. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Inguinal hernia; Desarda repair Tissue-based repair; Lichtenstein procedure; Mesh repair | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 262 PDF Download: 310 |
||
