RESPONSE OF SUGAR BEET (BETA VULGARIS, L.) TO POTASSIUM APPLICATION AND IRRIGATION WITH SALINE WATER استجابة بنجر السکر لإضافة البوتاسيوم والرى بماء ملحى | ||
| Assiut University Bulletin for Environmental Researches | ||
| Article 14, Volume 7.1, Issue 7.1, March 2004, Pages 123-136 PDF (619.15 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/auber.2004.150617 | ||
| Abstract | ||
| ABSTRACT : A pot experiment was conducted during the winter growing seasons of 2001/2002 and 2002/2003 in the greenhouse of the Faculty of Agric., Al-Azhar Univ., Assiut campus. A complete randomized design with four replications was used in this study. A combination of four potassium levels (0, 24, 48, and 72 kg K2O /fed) with four levels of saline irrigation water (tap water, 2000, 4000 and 6000 ppm) on root yield and some chemical composition of sugar beet. The mean effects of these interactions confirmed depressing manner in sugar beet growth with increasing salt concentration in the irrigation water up to 6000. The same trend holds true regarding both refineable sugar and purity percentages of the root juice. On contrary, TSS% in roots was significantly increased under such prevailing unfavourable conditions. The sustainable results ascertained the significance effect of salinity levels in irrigation water on K, Na or K/Na ratio in roots of sugar beet. Total soluble solids, refineable sugar, purity percentages of root juice, total root yield and top yield of sugar beet plants increased as K fertilizer increased. Generally, sugar beet plants could tolerate saline water up to 2000 ppm without impaired effects on growth yield and quality. Moreover, K application resulted in improving the quality of sugar beet roots either irrigated with saline water or with tap water. أجريت هذه التجربة في صوبة بکلية الزراعة جامعة الأزهر أسيوط خلال موسمى النمو الشتوي 2001/2002م ، 2002/2003م فى نظام قطاعات عشوائية لاختبار التداخلات بين مستويات مختلفة من السماد البوتاسي (صفر، 24، 48، 72 کم بو2 أ/فدان) مع ثلاث مستويات من الري بماء ملحى (2000 ، 4000 ، 6000 جزء فى المليون) مع استعمال ماء الصنبور للمقارنة علي محصول الجذور والترکيب الکيميائي لنبات بنجر السکر. التأثير الرئيس لهذه التفاعلات أکدت انخفاض فى نمو نبات بنجر السکر مع زيادة ترکيز الأملاح بماء الري إلي 6000 جزء في المليون. نفس الاتجاه کان يتحقق بخصوص کلا من نسبة صافي السکر والنقاوة فى العصير. وعلي العکس فإن النسبة المئوية للمواد الصلبة الکلية في الجذور قد زادت معنوياً تحت ظروف الري الملحي السائد. أکدت النتائج تحقيق التأثير المعنوى لمستويات الملوحة فى ماء الري على البوتاسيوم والصوديوم وکذلک النسبة بين البوتاسيوم إلي الصوديوم فى جذور نبات بنجر السکر. نسبة المواد الصلبة والسکر الصافى والسکروز في عصير الجذور وکذلک محصول الجذر والأوراق لکل نبات من بنجر السکر زادت مع إضافة السماد البوتاسي. عامة، نبات بنجر السکر يستطيع تحمل الملوحة في ماء الري حتى 2000 جزء في المليون بدون تأثير يذکر علي النمو أو المحصول أو بعض صفات الجودة تحت الدراسة وکذلک إضافة سماد البوتاسيوم أدي لتحسين المحصول وصفات الجودة لنبات بنجر السکر سواء رويت بماء ملحي (مستوى 4000 جزء فى المليون) أو ماء عذب. | ||
| References | ||
REFERENCES:Ahmed, A.M. (1987). Effect of saline irrigation water, N-fertilization and supplemental foliar spraying with K and Mg on growth, nutritional status and yield of sugar beet in desert calcareous soil. Desert Inst. Bull. Egypt. 37 (2): 219-239. Balba, A.M. (1968). “Soil Fertility” Dar El-Matboat El-Gadida, Alex., Egypt. (In Arabic). Beringer, H., K. Koch and M.G. Lindhauer. (1986). Sucrose accumulation and osmotic potentials in sugar beet at increasing levels of potassium nutrition. J. Sci. Food Agric., 37: 211-218. Bernstein, L. (1964) salt tolerance of plants. USDA Agricultural Bull. No. 283. Bondok, M.A. (1996). The role of boron in regulating growth, yield and hormonal balance in sugar beet Annals Agric., Sci., Ain Shams Univ., Cairo, 41 (1): 15-33. Carter, J. N. (1986). Potassium and sodium uptake effects on sucrose concentration and quality of sugar beet roots. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol., 23 (3-4): 183-202. Cooke, D.A. and R.K. Scott. (1993). The sugar beet crop. Chapman and Hall London, pp. 262-265. Darwhish, Y. L, H. A. Attar, F.A. Askar and M. El-Harris (1995). Sugar beet response to soil salinity and sodicity at northern Nile Delta. Egypt J. of soil Sci. 35 (4):395 – 400. El-Etreiby, F. (2000). Effect of saline irrigation water and micronutrient foliar application on sugar beet cultivars. Alex. Sci. Exch. Vol. 21 (4): 397 – 407.
El-Harriri, D.M. and M. E. Gobarh. (2001). Response of growth, yield and quality of sugar beet to nitrogen and potassium fertilizers under newly reclaimed sandy soil. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Unvi., 26 (10): 5895 – 5907.
El-Hawary, M.A. (1994a). Effect of boron and zinc fertilization on growth yield of sugar beet plants grown under different soil salinity levels. Al-Azhar J. Agric. Res., Vol. 20: 25-35.
El-Hawary, M.A. (1994b). Effect of phoshporus and potassium fertilization on salt tolerance of sugar beet plants. Proc. 6th Conf. Agron., Al-Azhar Univ., Cairo, Egypt, Vol. 11: 881-895.
El-Kortoby, A.O.I. (1982). Biochemical studies of some plants regulators and minor elements on the constituents of sugar beet. M.Sc. Thesis, Fac. of Agric., Ain Shams Univ., Egypt.
El-Maghraby, S. S., M. M. Shehata and Y. H. Tawfik. (1998). Effect of soil and foliar application of nitrogen and potassium on sugar beet. Egypt. J. Agric. Res., 76 (2): 665 – 678.
El-Noemani, A.A. (1996). Influence of irrigation with saline water on growth, yield and chemical composition of five sugar beet (Beta vulgaris, L.) varieties. Egypt. J. Appl, Sci. 11 (2): 268 – 291.
El-Wakeel, A.F. (1993). Effect of some soil characteristic on root growth, juice quality and yield of sugar beet. Egyptian J. of Agric. Res., 71 (3): 609 – 620.
Graham, R.D. and A. Ulrich. (1974). Retranslocation of potassium in (Beta vulgaris, L.) under conditions of low sodium supply. Aust. J. Plant Physiology, 1: 387-396.
Gobarh, M.E. (2001). Effect of foliar application with some micronutrients on sugar beet grown in newly reclaimed sandy soil. J. Agric. Sci., Mansoura Univ., 26 (10): 5929-5937.
Greenway, H. and R. Munns. (1980). Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Ann. Rev. plant physiology, 31: 149–190.
Heuer, B and Z. Plaut (1989). Photosynthesis and osmotic adjustment of two sugar beet cultivars grown under saline conditions. J. Exper. Bot. 40 (213): 437 – 440.
Higazy, M. A., M. M. Shehata and A. Allam (1995). Free proline relation to salinity tolerance of three sugar beet varieties. Egypt. J.Agric. Res., 73 (1): 175 – 191.
Hills, F.S., S.S. Johnson and B.A. Godwin (1990). The sugar beet industry. California Univ., Exp. Stn. Bull. 1916. (C.F. irrigation of Agricltural Crops, 5613, 1742, 1990).
Kaffka, S., Dong-Daxue, G. Peterson and Dx. Dong. (1999). Saline water can be reused irrigate sugar beets but sugar may be low. California Agriculture, 53: 1. 11 – 15.
Kandil, S.A, M.S.A Abo El-Kheir and H.A. El-Zeiny (1999). Increasing salt tolerance of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris, L.) plants through application of uniconazole. J. Agric. Sci., Monsoura Univ., 24 (7): 3413 – 3425.
Khafagi, D.M.A., A.A Abdel Rahman and W.I. El-.Lawandy, (1996). Salt tolerance of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris, L.). I. Growth water relations and photosynthetic pigments. Annals of Agric. Sci., Monshtohor 34 (4): 1631 – 1646.
Khafagi, O. M. A. and W.I. El-Lawandy (1996). Salt tolerance of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris, L.). I I. Metabollic products and ion accumulation. Annals of Agric. Sci., Moshtohor products, 34 (4): 1947 – 1663.
Khalil, S. M., S. N. Mostafa and Z. R. Mostafa (2001). Influence of potassium fertilizer and soil salinity on chemical composition of sugar beet root. Minufiya J. Agric. Res., Vol. 26 No. 3: 583 – 594.
Le-Docte, A. (1927). Comerical determination of sugar in the beet root using the Saccharimeter. Le-Docte process. Int. Sugar J. 29 : 448 – 492.
Liu, Y., Tc-Zou., G. Geng., Xu-Fq and Yz-Wang (1992). Effect of potash on sugar beet quality and adversity resistance. China-Sugar beet, No. 4, 15 – 20.
Meiri, A. and Z. Plaut. (1985). Corp production and management under saline conditions. Plant and Soil, 98: 253 – 272.
Mekki, B.B. and M.M. El-Gazzar (1999). Response of root yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris, L.) to irrigation with saline water and foliar potassium fertilization. Annals agric. Sci. Ain Shams Univ., Cairo, 44 (1): 213-225.
Mengel, K. and E.A. Kirkby (1980). Potassuim in crop production. Adv. Agron. 33: 59-110.
Plaut, Z. and B. Heuer (1985). Adjustment, growth, photosynthesis and transpiration of sugar beet plants exposed to saline conditions. Field crop Res., 10 (1) 1 –13.
Poschenok (1976). Biochemical Analysis of Fruit and Vegetable Products. TataMc graw-Hill publishing company limited, New Delhi pp, 634 – 650.
Reda, K.A., A.A. Shalaby, H.T. Kishk and A.M. Hegazi. (1980). Some effects of potassium on growth yield and chemical composition of beet irrigated with saline water containing different levels of boron. Ain Shams Univ., Fac. Agric., Res. Bull. 12337: 16 pp.
Roades, J.D. and J. Loveday (1990). Salinity in Irrigated Agriculture. pp. 1089–1142. In stewart, B.A. and D.R Nielsen (eds.). Irrigation of Agricultural Crops. Agronomy No. 30, American Soc. of Agron. Inc., Madison.
Sarkar, A.K. and P.K. Ghosh (1989). Effect of decapitation and foliar application of KNO3 solution of root enlargement stage on yield of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris, L.) Indian Agric. 33 (4): 259 – 261. (C.F. field crop Abst. 44 (8), 5708, 1991).
Saxena, N. P. (1985). The role of potassium in drought tolerance. Potash Review, Potash fertilizers and manuring 102nd suite, subject 16, N. 5/1985.
Shehata, M.M. (1989). Physiological studies on the tolerance of some sugar beet varieties to salinity. Ph.D. Thesis, Fac. Agric., Cairo Univ., Egypt.
Shehata, M.M., S.M. Abdel-Sayed and S. El-Hamshary (1994a). Response of sugar beet varieties to irrigation water salinity. Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., Vol. 9 (10): 277-285.
Shehata, M. M., S.Y. Beheet and N. M. Taha (1994b). Chemical composition of six sugar beet varieties as affected by saline water irrigation. Egypt. J. Appl. Sci., Vol. 9 (11): 844-852.
Shehata, M. M., Shohair, A. A. and S. N. Mostafa (2000). The effect of soil moisture level on four sugar beet varieties. Egypt. J. Agric. Res., 78 (3): 1141 – 1160.
Simon, P.W.,C.E. Peterson and R.C. Lindsay (1980). Correlations between sensory and objective parameters of college flavor, J. Agric. Food chem. 28: 559 – 562.
Snedecor, G.W. and W.G. Cochran (1981). Statistical methods, seventh Ed. Iowa State Univ. Press Ames, lowa, USA.
Steel, A. and F. Torrie (1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics Mc Grow-Hill Book Company Inc., New York, Toronto, London.
Strognov, B.P. (1962). Physiological basis of the salt tolerance of plants (under different types of soil salinization). Izd Akad. Nauk, USSR Moscow.
Sun, S.J., Li-Fs, Y. Wan and G.C Zheng (1994). Effect of zinc and potassium on dry matter accumulation of sugar beet in mid-late growing season. China-Sugar Beet No. 4, 26-29.
Yazdani, H., A. Tavassoli and Vali M.Fallah (1995). Management of soils irrigated with saline water for sugar beet and cotton production. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Integrated Soil Management for Sustainable Use of Salt Affected Soil November 6 – 10, 1995.
Younes, A.H., N.Z. Younan and N.M. Talkhawy (1997). The effect of saline water on sugar beet yield of three genotypes. Adv. Agric. Res. Vol. 2 (1): 45-54. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 258 PDF Download: 256 |
||
