EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AND FLEXURAL RIGIDITY OF EPOXY GRANITE COMPOSITE MATERIAL | ||
| JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences | ||
| Article 4, Volume 49, No 2, March and April 2021, Pages 198-214 PDF (791.13 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/jesaun.2021.61303.1033 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Mohamed Omar* 1; Yasser Abdelrhman2; Ibrahim M. Hassab2; wael M. Khierldeen2, 3 | ||
| 1Aeronautical Engineering, Institute of Aviation Engineering and Technology, Cairo, Egypt | ||
| 2Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Assiut University, Egypt | ||
| 3Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Department, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology, Egypt | ||
| Abstract | ||
| In Egypt, large quantities of coarse granite wastes are produced annually during the quarrying operations of granite rocks. This waste represents a potentially useful source of material for a variety of applications such as a filler material in epoxy granite composite material. In this work a new eco-friendly composite material studied as a substitute for machine tools traditional materials, like cast iron, to produce better efficiency with lower cost. This study aims to investigate the mechanical properties of granite epoxy composite by using the local epoxy (kemapoxy 150) and the granite residues in the Egyptian quarries. The investigated processing variable was epoxy content, and the mechanical characterization ware carried out by compressive and flexural tests according to the ASTM standard method B. Commercially available, Aswan red granite was procured, crushed, and sieved to three size ranges from 0.150 to 8 mm, respectively. Epoxy ratios of 80:20, 85:15 have been used with granite aggregate size mix with small, medium, and coarse size proportions of 50:25:25 respectively for preparing the specimens with granite granular size range (0.150-8) mm. The results show that Epoxy granite composite with granite to epoxy ratio of 80:20% wt. induced the highest compressive strength (72.15 MPa) while the composite with the ratio of 85:15% wt. induced the highest flexural strength (20.1 MPa). Epoxy granite composite show superior results with respect to cement concrete, polyester concrete, and natural granite. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Epoxy-Granite; composite materials; Compressive strength; Flexural rigidity; Resin ratio | ||
| References | ||
|
[1] A. A. M. Ahmed, K. H. Abdel kareem, A. M. Altohamy, and S. A. M. Rizk, “Potential Use of Mines and Quarries Solid Waste in Road Construction and as Replacement Soil Undre Foundations,” JES. J. Eng. Sci., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1094–1105, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2014.115043.
[2] A. Piratelli-Filho and F. Levy-Neto, “Behavior of granite-epoxy composite beams subjected to mechanical vibrations,” Mater. Res., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 497–503, 2010, doi: 10.1590/S1516-14392010000400012.
[3] S. Orak, “Investigation of vibration damping on polymer concrete with polyester resin,” vol. 30, pp. 171–174, 2000.
[4] P. R. Venugopal et al., “Structural investigation of steel-reinforced epoxy granite machine tool column by finite element analysis,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl., vol. 233, no. 11, pp. 2267–2279, 2019, doi: 10.1177/1464420719840592.
[5] P. Boral, T. Nieszporek, and R. Gołȩbski, “The welded CNC machine tool frame,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 157, pp. 1–8, 2018, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201815701003.
[6] T. C. Chen, Y. J. Chen, M. H. Hung, and J. P. Hung, “Design analysis of machine tool structure with artificial granite material,” Adv. Mech. Eng., vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1–14, 2016, doi: 10.1177/1687814016656533.
[7] P. R. Venugopal et al., “Design and analysis of epoxy granite vertical machining centre base for improved static and dynamic characteristics,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl., vol. 234, no. 3, pp. 481–495, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1464420719890892.
[8] R. R. Krishna and S. V. Kumar, “A sian R esearch C onsortium Experimental Studies on Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Granite for Machine Tool Structure using Design of Experiments,” vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1333–1342, 2017.
[9] A. Piratelli-Filho and F. Shimabukuro, “Characterization of Compression Strength of Granite-epoxy Composites Using Design of Experiments,” Mater. Res. J. Mater., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 399–404, 2008, doi: 10.1590/S1516-14392008000400003.
[10] C. Subhash, M. R. Krishna, M. S. Raj, B. H. Sai, and S. R. Rao, “Development of granite powder reinforced epoxy composites,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 13010–13014, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.286.
[11] M. L. P. Gomes, E. A. S. Carvalho, T. J. C. Demartini, E. A. de Carvalho, H. A. Colorado, and C. M. F. Vieira, “Mechanical and physical investigation of an artificial stone produced with granite residue and epoxy resin,” J. Compos. Mater., no. 52, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0021998320968137.
[12] P. V Selvakumar, AMohanram, “Analysis of Alternative Composite Material for High,” Int. J. Eng., no. 1, pp. 95–98, 2012.
[13] S. S. Balakrishna, H. Girish, G. C. M. Kumar, and S. Narendranath, “Analysis on Mechanical and Dynamic behavior of Granite Epoxy Composites with Cast Iron Particulates as Filler,” Indian J. Adv. Chem. Sci., pp. 122–126, 2016.
[14] D. D. Ubale, A. P. Patil, and K. V Gurav, “EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF MATERIAL PROPERTIES OF,” pp. 22–24, 2013.
[15] P. Mani, A. K. Gupta, and S. Krishnamoorthy, “Comparative study of epoxy and polyester resin-based polymer concretes,” Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 157–163, 1987, doi: 10.1016/0143-7496(87)90071-6.
[16] A. A. M. Ahmed, K. H. Abdel kareem, A. M. Altohamy, and S. A. M. Rizk, “An experimental study on the availability of solid waste of mines and quarries as coarse aggregate in concrete mixes,” JES. J. Eng. Sci., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 876–890, May 2014, doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2014.115024.
[17] A. Rutkauskas, D. Nagrockienė, G. Skripkiūnas, and K. Barkauskas, “Determining Reactivity Level of Granite Aggregate for Concrete,” vol. 20, pp. 33–37, 2017, doi: 10.2478/cons-2017-0005.
[18] M. Y. Abdellah, A. Abdelhaleem, I. A. Alnaser, and G. T. A. Jaber, “Flexural , compression and fracture properties of epoxy granite as a cost - effective structure materials : new machine element foundation,” vol. 8, no. February, pp. 82–98, 2021, doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021006.
[19] H. Mechanical, C. Resistance, and T. E. Coating, “Protective Coating Products Epoxy Paints Kemapoxy 150 Epoxy Paints Great Products,” no. 202, pp. 15–16.
[20] O. M. Yousri, M. H. Abdellatif, and G. Bassioni, “Effect of Al 2O 3 Nanoparticles on the Mechanical and Physical Properties of Epoxy Composite,” Arab. J. Sci. Eng., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 1511–1517, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s13369-017-2955-7.
[21] F. L. Jin, X. Li, and S. J. Park, “Synthesis and application of epoxy resins: A review,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 29. Korean Society of Industrial Engineering Chemistry, pp. 1–11, Sep. 25, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.03.026.
[22] R. Liu and X. Wang, “Synthesis, characterization, thermal properties and flame retardancy of a novel nonflammable phosphazene-based epoxy resin,” Polym. Degrad. Stab., vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 617–624, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.01.008.
[23] S. T. Methods, “Standard Test Methods for Compressive Strength of Molded Soil-Cement Cylinders 1,” Transp. Res., vol. 84, no. July 1996, pp. 1–6, 2000.
[24] S. T. Method, “Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Chemical- Resistant Mortars , Grouts , Monolithic Surfacings , and,” Annu. B. ASTM Stand., vol. 02, no. Reapproved 2008, pp. 1–5, 2011.
[25] N. Mahendrakumar, S. Syathabuthakeer, and P. V Mohanram, “Study of Alternative Structural Materials for Machine Tools 1* 1*,” no. Aimtdr, pp. 1–6, 2014.
[26] G. M. A. Wahab, M. Gouda, and G. Ibrahim, “Study of physical and mechanical properties for some of Eastern Desert dimension marble and granite utilized in building decoration,” Ain Shams Eng. J., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 907–915, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2019.07.003. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 898 PDF Download: 1,047 |
||
