القلب وأثره في نقض العلل القياسية - دراسة في علمي الأصول والجدل -

عنوان المقالة [English]

The converse and its effect on reversing standard causes - a study in the sciences of origins and argumentation .

المؤلفون [English]

Dr.. Rami Nasser Mohammed Al-Ayasrah.

Assistant Professor in the Department of Jurisprudence and its Foundations, College of Sharia, Zarqa Private University, Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.

المستخلص [English]

Abstract:

This research came to shed light on a contradictory one of the negatives of the standard cause, which is (the heart), which is a dialectical and fundamental mental reasoning that is used in the debate and the proof of saying with the argument and the logical mental evidence. This confirms that the rules and the argumentative premises are followed in proving the legal arguments, and their role in the jurisprudential disagreement and debate. The fundamentalist analogy is one of the most important evidence that the jurist resort to, and its essence is to extract the illness, to revise it, and to investigate it in the measured branch. Therefore, this illness must be safe from the lashers that can be nullified so that it is a valid reason suitable for analogy.

The research consists of an introduction, an introduction, five topics and a conclusion .

Five sections are as follows:

The first topic: Defining the heart as a language and an idiom.

The second topic: proving and denying the heart.

The third topic: the difference between the opposition and the heart.

The fourth topic: In whether the heart is corruption or opposition.

The fifth topic: the sections of the heart, and their arrangement in terms of strength.

Conclusion and includes the most important findings and recommendations.

الکلمات الرئيسية [English]

(Reasoning evidence) (Jurisprudence dispute) (Islamic arguments) (Fundamental discussion) (Measuring the cause) .