EXPERIMENTAL TESTS ON STRIP FOOTINGS RESTING ON GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED REPLACEMENT SOIL OVERLYING LOOSE SAND | ||
| Journal of the Egyptian Society of Engineers | ||
| Article 26, Volume 58, Issue 2, July 2019, Pages 9-4 PDF (487.71 K) | ||
| Document Type: Scientific and technological | ||
| Author | ||
| Mohamed kamal Hussein* | ||
| Teaching Assistant, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, | ||
| Abstract | ||
| This paper presents the results of laboratory model tests to investigate the performance of shallow footings resting on geosynthetic reinforced replacement soil overlying loose sand. The model tests are conducted in a 1250 mm long, 400 mm wide, and 800 mm deep steel tank. A strip footing is simulated using a 30 mm thick, 100 mm wide, and 380 mm long steel plate. The purpose of the testing program is to determine the effect of the configuration of reinforced replacement soil on improvement in bearing capacity and settlement of the strip footing. The number of reinforcement layers (N = 1, 2, 3), length of reinforcement (L = 6B, 4B, 2B), and thickness of the replacement soil relative to footing width (d/B = 1.2, 1.5, 1.8) are varied. A punching shear failure mechanism is observed in the laboratory tests for unreinforced soil, which tends to fade as the number of reinforcement layers increase. Improvements in observed settlement occurred at settlements beyond 10% of the footing width. Increase in bearing capacity ratios due to increasing the number of reinforcement layers, length of reinforcement, and thickness of replacement soil is discussed. | ||
| References | ||
|
1- ASTM D2487 - Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System), ASTM International.
2- ASTM D6913 Standard Test Methods for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis, ASTM International.
3- ASTM D7181 Method for Consolidated Drained Triaxial Compression Test for Soils, ASTM International.
4- Binquet, J. and Lee, K.L. (1975). Bearing capacity analysis on reinforced earth slabs, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE 101 (GT12), pp. 1257–1276.
5- Cerato, B.A. (2005). Scale effects of shallow foundation bearing capacity on granular material, PhD thesis of Massachusetts Amherst University, USA.
6- Consoli, N.C., Rosa, F.D., and Fonini, A. (2009). Plate load tests on compacted soil layers overlying weaker soil, J. of Geotechnical. &Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 135 (12), pp. 1846-1856.
7- Elvidge B.C. (1999). Effect of reinforcement length on the bearing capacity of footings on shallow granular layers, Master degree thesis, University Queen, Ontario, Canada.
8- King, K.H., Das, B.M., Puri, V.K., Yen, S.C., and Cook, E.E. (1993). Strip foundation on sand underlain by soft clay with geogrid reinforcement, Proceedings of the third (1993) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Singapore (1), pp. 517-521.
9- Kumar. A, Ohri M. L., and Bansal R. K. (2007). Bearing capacity tests of strip footings on reinforced layered soil, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 25, pp.139–150
10- Kumar.A. and Walia B.S. (2006). Bearing capacity of square footings on reinforced layered soil, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 24, pp. 1001–1008.
11- Love, J.P., Burd. H.J., Milligan, G.W.E., and Houlsby, G.T. (1987). Analytical and model studies of reinforcement of a layer of granular fill on a soft clay subgrade, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 24(4), pp. 611-622.
12- Mohamed, M.A. (2010). Two dimensional experimental study for the behaviour of surface footing on unreinforced and reinforced sand beds overlying soft pockets, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 28, pp. 589-596.
13- Ornek, M. (2009). Geogrid reinforcement on soft clay deposits, PhD Dissertation, University of Cukurova, Turkey.
14- Rethaliya, R.P. and Verma, A.K. (2009). Footings on sand overlying soft clay with geosynthetics interface, PhD Dissertation, Sardar Patel University, India.
15- Trautmann, C.H., and Kulhawy, F.H. (1988). Uplift load-displacement behavior of spread foundations, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 114 (2), 168-183. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 80 PDF Download: 146 |
||
