THE EFFECT OF ADDING CALCINED ALUMINA ON THE MICROSTRUCTURE AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF ALUMINUM FOAM | ||
| JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences | ||
| Article 2, Volume 49, No 5, September and October 2021, Pages 551-576 PDF (1.19 M) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/jesaun.2021.76842.1053 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Mohamed Amin Elsheemy* 1; Ibrahim H Abdel Daiam2; Refaie Omar3; Yasser Abdelrhman2 | ||
| 1Mechanical Engineering Dept., Institute of Aviation Engineering and Technology, Cairo, Egypt | ||
| 2Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Assiut University, Assiut 71516, Egypt | ||
| 3Mining and Metallurgical engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Assiut University, Assiut 71516, Egypt | ||
| Abstract | ||
| In the last decades, Aluminum foam has attracted many researchers and manufacturers due to its unique properties which find a lot of applications, especially in a lightweight structure. The current work aims to study the effect of adding calcined alumina to the melting aluminum on the final mechanical and microstructure of produced aluminum foam. Calcium carbonate was used as a foaming agent. The study reveals that calcination times/temperature have a significant effect on the final foam porosity. with increasing calcination time from 30 min to 90 min the foam density improved from 2.27 to 1.27 g/cm3, which consequently result in increase of samples porosity from 15.9 to 52.7%. also, the results from the compression test show that the variation of calcination time can be used to alter the energy absorption capacity of samples. Tested samples achieved the highest energy absorption of 128 MPa at a calcination time of 90 min. Also, the study reveals that calcination temperature has a significant effect on the final foam porosity. with increasing calcination temperature from 400 to 800°C, the foam density improved from 2.18 to 1.09 g/cm3, which consequently result in increase of samples porosity from 18.94 to 52.79%. Tested samples achieved the highest energy absorption of 325 MPa at a calcination temperature of 800°C. The increase in porosity is measured by ImageJ software, and the energy absorption test was carried out by a quasi-static compression test. These improvements produced material can be used in applications needs high energy absorption like automotive industry. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Aluminum foam; calcined alumina; lightweight materials; blowing agent; energy absorption | ||
| References | ||
|
[1] J. Banhart and H. W. Seeliger, “Recent trends in aluminum foam sandwich technology,” Adv. Eng. Mater., vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1082–1087, 2012, doi: 10.1002/adem.201100333.
[2] C. Gui, J. Bai, and W. Zuo, “Simplified crashworthiness method of automotive frame for conceptual design,” Thin-Walled Struct., vol. 131, pp. 324–335, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2018.07.005.
[3] T. Miyoshi, M. Itoh, S. Akiyama, and A. Kitahara, “ALPORAS aluminum foam: Production process, properties, and applications,” Adv. Eng. Mater., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 179–183, 2000, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1527-2648(200004)2:43.0.CO;2-G.
[4] M. A. Islam et al., “Investigation of microstructural and mechanical properties of cell walls of closed-cell aluminium alloy foams,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 666, pp. 245–256, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.04.046.
[5] M. González Nava, A. Cruz-Ramírez, M. Á. Suarez Rosales, V. H. Gutiérrez-Pérez, and A. Sánchez-Martínez, “Fabrication of aluminum alloy foams by using alternative thickening agents via melt route,” J. Alloys Compd., vol. 698, pp. 1009–1017, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2016.12.170.
[6] I. Duarte, E. Ventura, S. Olhero, and J. M. Ferreira, “A novel approach to prepare aluminium-alloy foams reinforced by carbon-nanotubes,” 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.07.115.
[7] R. Karuppasamy and D. Barik, “Production methods of aluminium foam: A brief review,” Mater. Today Proc., no. xxxx, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.161.
[8] S. H. Mohammed, “Manufacturing of Aluminum Foam as a Light Weight Structural Material,” Eng. &Tech.Journal, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 697–702, 2016.
[9] M. A. Kader et al., “Macro and micro collapse mechanisms of closed-cell aluminium foams during quasi-static compression,” Mater. Des., vol. 118, pp. 11–21, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.011.
[10] N. Mahmutyazicioglu, O. Albayrak, M. Ipekoglu, and S. Altintas, “Effects of alumina (Al2O3) addition on the cell structure and mechanical properties of 6061 foams,” J. Mater. Res., vol. 28, no. 17, pp. 2509–2519, 2013, doi: 10.1557/jmr.2013.187.
[11] H. Oveisi and T. Geramipour, “High mechanical performance alumina-reinforced aluminum nanocomposite metal foam produced by powder metallurgy: Fabrication, microstructure characterization, and mechanical properties,” Mater. Res. Express, vol. 6, no. 12, 2019, doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab608b.
[12] D. P. Papadopoulos, H. Omar, F. Stergioudi, S. A. Tsipas, H. Lefakis, and N. Michailidis, “A novel method for producing Al-foams and evaluation of their compression behavior,” J. Porous Mater., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 773–777, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10934-009-9349-5.
[13] Z. X. Sun, T. T. Zheng, Q. B. Bo, M. Du, and W. Forsling, “Effects of calcination temperature on the pore size and wall crystalline structure of mesoporous alumina,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., vol. 319, no. 1, pp. 247–251, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.11.023.
[14] A. H. Fakeeha, “Effects of calcination and activation temperature on dry reforming catalysts,” pp. 55–61, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jscs.2010.10.020.
[15] C. Liu et al., “Calcination of green high-belite sulphoaluminate cement (GHSC) and performance optimizations of GHSC-based foamed concrete,” Mater. Des., vol. 182, p. 107986, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107986.
[16] Y. Hangai, T. Morita, and T. Utsunomiya, “Functionally graded aluminum foam consisting of dissimilar aluminum alloys fabricated by sintering and dissolution process,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 696, pp. 544–551, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.04.070.
[17] K. Kapat, P. K. Srivas, and S. Dhara, “Coagulant assisted foaming – A method for cellular Ti6Al4V: Influence of microstructure on mechanical properties,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, vol. 689, no. February, pp. 63–71, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.02.040.
[18] A. Kulshreshtha and S. K. Dhakad, “Preparation of metal foam by different methods: A review,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 26, pp. 1784–1790, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.375.
[19] Y. Wang, X. Ren, H. Hou, Y. Zhang, and W. Yan, “Processing and pore structure of aluminium foam sandwich,” Powder Technol., vol. 275, pp. 344–350, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2015.01.066.
[20] M. Aboraia, R. Sharkawi, and M. A. Doheim, “Production of aluminium foam and the effect of calcium carbonate as a foaming agent,” vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 441–451, 2011.
[21] T. Utsunomiya, R. Yamaguchi, Y. Hangai, O. Kuwazuru, and N. Yoshikawa, “Estimation of plateau stress of porous aluminum based on mean stress on maximum-porosity cross section,” Mater. Trans., vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 1182–1186, 2013, doi: 10.2320/matertrans.M2013069. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 376 PDF Download: 544 |
||
