ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE, TRUST, IDENTIFICATION AND ITS RELATION WITH ACADEMIC STAFF’ CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR | ||
| Port Said Scientific Journal of Nursing | ||
| Article 12, Volume 8, Issue 1, 2021, Pages 317-341 PDF (645.06 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/pssjn.2021.51659.1069 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Sahar Hassan Helaly* ; Ahlam Mahmoud El Shaer | ||
| Nursing administration | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Background: Organizational justice, trust and identification deals with the academic staff’ perception of fairness, rewards, relation and participating in a decision-making process that strengthening employees to provide large effort above the expectations of official role as organizational citizenship. It is individual behaviors, which are helpfulness, well-meaning and cooperation among faculty members and avoid undesirable acts to improve the skills of academic staff. Aim Identify the relationship of organizational justice, trust, and identification with academic staff` citizenship behavior. Design: Descriptive correlation was utilized. Setting: Faculty of nursing- Mansoura University. Subjects: all nursing academic staff at nursing faculty during the academic year 2017-2018 and not have managerial position (160). Tools: Four tools were used: organizational justice scale, organizational trust scale, Organizational Identification Questionnaire and Organizational Citizenship Behavior Questionnaire. Result: High percent 43.8%, 61.9% & 80% of academic staff had high level of organizational trust, identification and citizenship behavior respectively, while (47.5%) of them had moderate level of organizational justice. Academic staff had high level of organizational citizenship behavior were high feeling of justice, trust and identification. Statistically significant correlations were found between organizational citizenship behavior with organizational justice, trust and identification. Conclusion: Organizational justice, trust and identification are significant for academic staff citizenship behaviors. Correlation was found between Organizational citizenship behaviors with organizational justice, trust and identification. Recommendation: The efforts of improve academic staff’s perceived organizational justice, trust and identification should be exerted by Faculty management through: provides equal chance for academic staff to participate in the process of decision making. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Academic Staff; Citizenship Behavior; Organizational Justice; Organizational Identification; Organizational Trust | ||
| References | ||
|
Abdalla, S. M., Mohamed, F. R., & Araf, S. M. (2013). Organizational citizenship behaviors among teaching staff at nursing faculties in Upper Egypt. Journal of American Science, 7, 9:347–363
Alim, M. M. A., & El-Sayed, R. I. (2017). Organizational attributes and its relation to organizational citizenship behavior among academic nursing staff. Egypt Nurs J, 14(1): 25-30
Altuntas, S., & Baykal, U. (2010). Relationship between nurses’ organizational trust levels and their organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of nursing scholarship, 42(2), 186-194.
Asadullah, M. A., Akram, A., Imran, H., & Arain, G. A. (2017). When and which employees feel obliged: a personality perspective of how organizational identification develops. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 33(2), 125-135.
Bayraktar, H. V., & Girgin, S. (2017). Investigation of the Relation between Trust in the Manager and Organizational Justice. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(8), 208-217.
Buluc, B. (2015). The relationship between academic staff's perceptions of organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors. Studia Psychologica, 57(1), 49-62
Campbell, J. W., & Im, T. (2015). Identification and trust in public organizations: A communicative approach. Public Management Review, 17(8), 1065-1084.
Caron, I., Ayed, A. K. B., & Vandenberghe, C. (2013). Collective incentive plans, organizational justice and commitment/Regimes collectifs de remuneration variable, justice organisationnelle et engagement/Regimenes colectivos de remuneracion variable, justicia organizacional y compromiso. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 68(1), 95-120.
Chen, C. H. V., Wang, S. J., Chang, W. C., & Hu, C. S. (2008). The effect of leader-member exchange, trust, supervisor support on organizational citizenship behavior in nurses. Journal of Nursing Research, 16(4), 321-328.
Chen, H., & Jin, Y. H. (2014). The effects of organizational justice on organizational citizenship behavior in the Chinese context: The mediating effects of social exchange relationship. Public Personnel Management, 43(3), 301-313.
Cheney, G., & Tompkins, P. K. (1987). Coming to terms with organizational identification and commitment. Communication Studies, 38(1), 1-15.
Demir, K. (2015). The Effect of Organizational Justice and Perceived Organizational Support on Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Organizational Identification. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 60, 131-148.
Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative science quarterly, 239-263.
Fernandez C and Awamleh R. (2006): Impact of organizational justice in an expatriate work environment. Management Research News; 29(11): 701-712.
Foreman P, Silvestri C, Whetten D, and Bubenzer Ph (2020): Organizational identity comparison, organizational identification, and organizational commitment.Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings; (1):210-39
Fox S and Spector E. (2011): Organizational citizenship behavior checklist, Loyola University Chicago, University of South Florida.
Guangling, W. (2011). The study on relationship between employees’ sense of organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior in private enterprises. Energy Procedia, 5, 2030-2034.
Goudarzvandchegin, M., Gilaninia, S., & Abdesonboli, R. (2011). Organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior case study: Rasht public hospitals. International Journal of Business Administration, 2(4), 42.
Imamoglu, S. Z., Ince, H., Turkcan, H., & Atakay, B. (2019). The effect of organizational justice and organizational commitment on knowledge sharing and firm performance. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 899-906.
Jung, J. Y., & Hong, S. (2008). Organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB), TQM and performance at the maquiladora. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 25 (8), 793-808.
Karanika-Murray, M., Duncan, N., Pontes, H. M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Organizational identification, work engagement, and job satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology.
Karriker, J. H., & Williams, M. L. (2009). Organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior: A mediated multifoci model. Journal of management, 35(1), 112-135.
Kim B (2019): Unstable jobs can’t cultivate good organizational citizenship behaviors: The sequential mediating role of organizational trust and identification. Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health; 16(2019).
Lee, U. H., Kim, H. K., & Kim, Y. H. (2013). Determinants of Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Its Outcomes. Global Business & Management Research, 5(1), 54–65
Lenard Ch, Joanne C, Wayne J. (2002): The development and consequences of student project groups. Journal of Marketing Education; 24:24-34.
Nadiri, H., & Tanova, C. (2010). An investigation of the role of justice in turnover intentions, job satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior in hospitality industry. International journal of hospitality management, 29(1), 33-41..
Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management journal, 36(3), 527-556.
Olkkonen, M. E., & Lipponen, J. (2006). Relationships between organizational justice, identification with organization and work unit, and group-related outcomes. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 100(2), 202-215.
Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2005). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Sage Publications.
.Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual-and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied Psychology, 94(1), 122.-141.
Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of vocational behavior, 66(2), 358-384..
Singh, U., & Srivastava, K. B. (2016). Organizational trust and organizational citizenship behaviour. Global Business Review, 17(3), 594-609.
Srivastava, S., & Madan, P. (2016). Understanding the roles of organizational identification, trust and corporate ethical values in employee engagement–organizational citizenship behavior relationship: A study on Indian managers. Management and Labor Studies, 41(4), 314-330.
Turhan, M., Köprülü, O., & Helvaci, I. (2016). The Relationship between academic staff's perception of organizational Justice and demographic factors: A Case Study in Foundation Universities in Turkey. International Review of Management and Business Research, 5(4), 1406-1413
Tzafrir, S. S. (2005). The relationship between trust, HRM practices and firm performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(9), 1600-1622.
Utami, A. F., Bangun, Y. R., & Lantu, D. C. (2014). Understanding the role of emotional intelligence and trust to the relationship between organizational politics and organizational commitment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 115, 378-386.
Uzonwanne, F. C. (2014). Organizational citizenship behavior and demographic factors among oil workers in Nigeria. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(8), 87-95.
Yilmaz. K., Tasdan M., (2009). Organizational citizenship and organizational justice in Turkish primary schools. Journal of educational administration, 47(1), Pp. 108-126.
Zeinabadi, H., & Salehi, K. (2011). Role of procedural justice, trust, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment in Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) of teachers: Proposing a modified social exchange model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1472-1481. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 374 PDF Download: 218 |
||
