RELATIONSHIP OF ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR OCCLUSAL PLANES WITH DIFFERENT SAGITTAL AND VERTICAL PATTERNS IN ADULTS | ||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||
| Article 9, Volume 46, Issue 2, August 2021, Pages 205-209 PDF (958.05 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.62490.1161 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Yomna Hassouna* 1; Ghada El Mehy2; Atia Yousif3 | ||
| 1Orthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Pharos University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt | ||
| 2Orthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Egypt | ||
| 3Orthodontics Department Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Introduction: The Occlusal plane plays an important role during orthodontic treatment. The occlusal plane affects the position of the mandible, smile esthetics, masticatory function, and stability post-orthodontic. Objectives: To evaluate the relationship of anterior occlusal plane (AOP) and posterior occlusal plane (POP) with skeletal and vertical patterns. Materials and Methods: Lateral cephalometric radiographs of 180 adult patients of different classes of malocclusion were used. Several angular measurements were measured and compared among all study groups to evaluate the existence of a relationship between AOP and POP with skeletal and vertical patterns. Results: The skeletal patterns showed a significant difference in AOP angle relative to both SN and FH planes among all classes of malocclusion (p-value =0.000**) having a steeper inclined plane in Class II and flat inclined plane in Class III. While no significant difference was found in the POP angle relative to FH (p=0.217) among all classes of malocclusion. The vertical patterns showed a significant difference in both AOP and POP relative to both SN plane and FH plane (P=0.000**) among the three vertical pattern groups showing steep incline planes in high angle group. Conclusions: The occlusal planes were found to have an impact on the jaw base where the variation in its angulation of different occlusal planes had affected both sagittal and vertical facial patterns. AOP relative to SN and FH were steeper in Class II and flat in Class III, while the POP relative to FH showed the same value in Classes II and III. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Anterior occlusal plane; Posterior occlusal plane; Skeletal patterns; Vertical pattern; Lateral cephalomtric radiograph | ||
| References | ||
|
1. Tanaka EM, Sato S. Longitudinal alteration of the occlusal plane and development of different dentoskeletal frames during growth. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:602 e1—602e11. 2. Anwar N, Fida M. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application. Eur J Orthod. 2009; 31:516–522. 3. Marshall SD, Caspersen M, Hardinger RR, Franciscus RG, Aquilino SA, Southard TE. Development of the curve of Spee. Am J Orthod. 2008;134:344–352. 4. Fushima K, Kitamura Y, Mita H, Sato S, Suzuki Y, Kim Y. Significance of the cant of the posterior occlusal plane in Class II division 1 malocclusions. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18:27–40. 5. Coro JC, Velasquez RL, Coro IM, Wheeler TT, McGorray SP, Sato S. Relationship of maxillary 3-dimensional posterior occlusal plane to mandibular spatial position and morphology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;150:140–152 6. Trpkova B, Major P, Prasad N, Nebbe B. Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproducibility: a meta analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:165–170 7. Jacobson A, Jacobson R. Radiographic Cephalometry. Chicago: Quintessence Pub.2006:2:49–51. 8. Phulari B. An atlas on cephalometric landmarks. JP medical Pub 2013:1:193–210. 9. Aboul-Azm S, Fahmy M. Facial esthetics of Egyptians with normal occlusion. Alex Dent J 1980;1:63–72. 10. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Br Med J.1940; 2: 358–59. 11. Celar A, Freudenthaler JW, Celar RM, Jonke E, Schneider B. The Denture Frame Analysis: an additional diagnostic tool. Eur J Orthod;1998: 579–587. 12. Čelar A, Tafaj E, Graf A, Lettner S. Association of anterior and posterior occlusal planes with different Angle and skeletal classes in permanent dentitions. J OrofacOrthop 2018; 79:267–276 13. Eppard H. The occlusal plane inclination relative to craniofacial form: A cephalometric investigation. MPH Thesis. Virginia, USA: West Virginia University. 2012:1–16. 14. Ishikawa H, Nakamura S, Iwasaki H, Kitazawa S, Tsukada H, Sato Y. Dentoalveolar compensation related to variations in sagittal jaw relationships. Angle Orthod 1999;69:534–538. 15. Ardani IGWA, Wicaksona A, Hamid T. The occlusal plane inclination analysis for determining skeletal class III malocclusion diagnosis. Clin Cosmet Investing Dent.2020:163–171. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 522 PDF Download: 1,011 |
||
