Visualized Subperiosteal Internal Lateral Osteotomy in Open Rhinoplasty for Improved Recovery and Outcome | ||
| The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | ||
| Article 14, Volume 45, Issue 4, October 2021, Pages 319-325 PDF (19.07 M) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/ejprs.2021.201656 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Yasmine G Darwish* ; Sarah S Raafat; Sherif Z Ezzat; Yusuf A El Kholy; Laila A Aboul Nasr | ||
| The Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Background: Many techniques are described for performing lateral osteotomies with the external perforating and the continuous internal methods being the most common. Osteotomy remains challenging, being done blindly and associated with morbidities. In this study a new simple approach for lateral osteotomy is described. This technique aims at achieving more precise osteotomy outcomes with a short learning curve and with morbidity reduction, in terms of edema and ecchymosis. Patients and Methods: A prospective, single-arm case series study is conducted on 20 patients seeking primary rhinoplasty. A periosteal incision is done and subperiosteal dissection is performed at the level of the proposed osteotomies. The osteotome is anchored under vision to the edge of the nasal bone and the osteotomy is performed along the proposed site till the radix. Follow-up visits with photography are at day two, day ten then at three weeks, two months, and three months. Results: Upon assessing the post-operative course of our cases, sixteen patients (80%) developed grade I edema, which resolved completely by the 3rd post-operative day. Eighteen patients (90%) did not complain of any ecchymosis in the post-operative period. An accelerated learning curve was noticed through shorter intraoperative time 42% downtime, easy replication of technique and better results. Conclusion: This technique of lateral osteotomies enables a higher degree of control for the fracture line with short learning curve and easy reproducibility. Furthermore, the amount and the duration of post-operative complications in terms of edema and ecchymosisare minimal. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Rhinoplasty; Osteotomy; Subperiosteal; Internal | ||
| References | ||
|
Wayne I.: Osteotomies in rhinoplasty surgery. Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery, 21 (4): 379-383, 2013. 2- Larrabee Jr., W.F. and Murakami C.: Osteotomy techniques to correct posttraumatic deviation of the nasal pyramid: A technical note. The Journal of cranio-maxillofacial trauma, 6 (1): 43-47, 2000. 3- Farrior R.T.: The osteotomy in rhinoplasty. The Laryngoscope, 88 (9): 1449-1459, 1978. 4- Chen J.X., Kozin E.D., Shaye D.A., Hadlock T., Lindsay R. and Lee L.N.: Educational cadaveric module for teaching percutaneous and intranasal osteotomies in rhinoplasty. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 156 (6): 1088- 1090, 2017. 5- Eris¸ir F. and Tahamiler R.: Lateral osteotomies in rhinoplasty: A safer and less traumatic method. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 28 (5): 518-520, 2008. 6- Rohrich R.J. and Adams Jr., W.P.: The boxy nasal tip: Classification and management based on alar cartilage suturing techniques. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 107 (7): 1849-63, 2001. 7- Heung-Man L., Kang H.J., Choi J.H. and Chae S.W.: Rationale for osteotome selection in rhinoplasty. The Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 116 (12): 1005, 2002. 8- Rettinger G.: Risks and complications in rhinoplasty. GMS current topics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery, 6, 2007. 9- Kar M., Cingi C. and Thomas R.: Complications of Rhinoplasty. In All Around the Nose (pp. 889-894). Springer, Cham., 2020. 10- Most S.P. and Murakami C.S.: Nasal osteotomies: Anatomy, planning, and technique. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics, 10 (3): 279-285, 2002. 11- Rho B.I., Lee I.H. and Park E.S.: Visible perforating lateral osteotomy: Internal perforating technique with wide periosteal dissection. Archives of Plastic Surgery, 43 (1): 88, 2016. 12- Kim J.S., Kim S.H. and Hwang S.H.: Method of lateral osteotomy to reduce eyelid edema and ecchymosis after rhinoplasty: A meta-analysis. The Laryngoscope, 2020. 13- Kim J.S., Kim S.H., Lee H., Kim B.G. and Hwang S.H.: Effects of Periosteal Elevation Before Lateral Osteotomy in Rhinoplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 2020. 14- El-Sisi H., Abdelwahab M. and Most S.P.: Association of periosteal sweeping vs periosteal preservation with early periorbital sequelae among patients undergoing external perforating osteotomy during rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, 21 (3): 185-190, 2019. 15- Chan D.S., Roskies M., Jooya A.A. and Samaha M.: Postoperative ecchymosis and edema after creation of subperiosteal tunnels in rhinoplasty: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, 21 (2): 133-136, 2019. 16- Khalaf A.Q., Taher F.S. and Khudhair H.M.: Comparism Study between Internal & External Lateral Osteotomy in Rhinoplasty Operations. J. Otolaryngol. ENT Res., 6 (2): 00159, 2017. 17- Yücel Ö.T.: Which type of osteotomy for edema and ecchymosis: External or internal? Annals of Plastic Surgery, 55 (6): 587-590, 2005. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 272 PDF Download: 718 |
||
