المغالطات في ردود منكري الرسالات في القرآن الكريم The fallacies in the responses of deniers of the Holy Quran messages | ||
| سياقات اللغة والدراسات البينية | ||
| Volume 2, Issue 1, April 2017, Pages 124-148 PDF (997.65 K) | ||
| Document Type: المقالة الأصلية | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/siaqat.2017.203447 | ||
| Author | ||
| Ayman Abu Mostafa | ||
| Lecturer of Rhetoric and Criticism, Al-Farabi Colleges, KSA. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| This study, entitled "The fallacies in the responses of deniers of the Holy Quran messages," depends on analyzing the responses of deniers of messages and identifying the manifestations of fallacy in those responses. Fallacies in rhetorical fact style do not rely on the imagination as much as they do on the emphasis and focus. In fact, addressing the truth is based on argument and proof and aims at persuading or discounting the opponent. The aim of the study is to explain how the false argument is formulated, to describe its semantic patterns and how to employ them, and to show the effect of pragmatic phenomena on the rhetorical fallacies. The study after the introduction is a prelude to the meaning of fallacy, followed by the types of verbal fallacy with sub-headings, including the types of fallacies: logical and contextual fallacy, illogical fallacy, authoritarian fallacy, wrong ending fallacy, and lying and swearing fallacies. In short, the deniers' fallacies depend heavily on plain language, with little reliance on rhetorical images but heavily depending on asserting their claims by various means of emphasis. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| مظاهر المغالطة; الإحكام والتركيز; وسائل المغالطة اللفظية; المغالطة الأستغلاقية | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 110 PDF Download: 78 |
||
