ElKafrawi, H. (2022). Fixed-Tension Sutures for Face and Neck Lifting. test, 46(1), 1-7. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2022.220414
Hossam Y. ElKafrawi. "Fixed-Tension Sutures for Face and Neck Lifting". test, 46, 1, 2022, 1-7. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2022.220414
ElKafrawi, H. (2022). 'Fixed-Tension Sutures for Face and Neck Lifting', test, 46(1), pp. 1-7. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2022.220414
ElKafrawi, H. Fixed-Tension Sutures for Face and Neck Lifting. test, 2022; 46(1): 1-7. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2022.220414

Fixed-Tension Sutures for Face and Neck Lifting

The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Article 2, Volume 46, Issue 1, January 2022, Pages 1-7    PDF (31.88 M)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejprs.2022.220414
Author
Hossam Y. ElKafrawi*
The Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University
Abstract
Background: Surgical facelifts has always been the
pinnacle of facial rejuvenation, however in face of an evergrowing
trend towards less invasive techniques, the ability
of plastic surgeons to sell this idea to their customers is
ever decreasing. Most of our patients are unwilling and
afraid of a long downtime, postoperative scars and possible
complications.
Thread lifting has been introduced to turn a facelift into
a less invasive, scarless, low complications technique. However
the absorbable PDO sutures, which are well advertised and
widely used by cosmetologists, have failed to gain the acceptance
of plastic surgeons based on their lack of durability, lack
of true fixation, and the fact that they work on the skin, not
the SMAS. Few thread techniques are available that combine
the use of permanent threads, stable fixation point, and work
on the SMAS layer. However, such techniques require the
use of expensive suture materials or specially designed instruments
and need special training courses, which limit their use
in our society being a very cost sensitive market.
Patients and Methods: In this paper, the author presents
his modification of the fixed, permanent suture technique,
using only widely available straight needles, and commercially
available coated polyester sutures (Ethibond), and was performed
in 50 patients over the last two years. The patient had
only mild or moderate sagging that could benefit from SMAS
suspension without the need for skin excision, patient with
marked skin laxity were advised for a surgical face lift.
Conclusion: The technique is intended for a plastic surgeon
with moderate to good experience of face lift as it needs the
ability to assess the different planes of the face and be able
to grab the SMAS in the sutures. The technique offers good
results in patient with mild to moderate sagging and should
be thought of as a substitute for surgical face lift.
Keywords
Key Words: Fixed; Tension; Sutures; Face; Neck -Lifting
References
1- Purohit S.: Reduction mammoplasty. Indian J. Plast. Surg.,
Oct. 41 (Suppl): S64-79. PMID: 20174545; PMCID:
PMC2825129, 2008.
2- Renó W.T.: Reduction mammaplasty with a circular folded
pedicle technique. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., Jul. 90 (1): 65-
74; discussion 75-6. PMID: 1615094, 1992.
Egypt, J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., January 2022 105
3- Saleem L. and John J.R.: Unfavourable results following
reduction mammoplasty. Indian J. Plast. Surg., May 46
(2): 401-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.118620. PMID:
24501476; PMCID: PMC3901921, 2013.
4- Khalil H.H., Malahias M. and Shetty G.: Triangular
lipodermal flaps in Wise pattern reduction mammoplasty
(superomedial pedicle): A novel technique to reduce Tjunction
necrosis. Plast. Surg. (Oakv). Fall, 24 (3): 191-
194. doi: 10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000975. Epub 2016
Aug 19. PMID: 28439509; PMCID: PMC5395051, 2016.
5- Fischer J.P., Cleveland E.C., Shang E.K., Nelson J.A. and
Serletti J.M.: Complications following reduction mammaplasty:
a review of 3538 cases from the 2005-2010
NSQIP data sets. Aesthet. Surg. J., Jan. 1; 34 (1): 66-73.
doi: 10.1177/1090820X13515676. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
PMID: 24334499, 2014.
6- Chao J.W., Taylor E.M. and Rohde C.H.: Reducing wound
healing complications of Wise pattern breast reduction
with the inverted "V" modification. J. Plast. Reconstr.
Aesthet. Surg., Mar. 67 (3): 421-2. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.
2013.09.032. Epub 2013 Oct 3. PMID: 24120419, 2014.
7- De la Plaza R., de la Cruz L., Moreno C. and Soto L.:
The crossed dermal flaps technique for breast reduction.
Aesthetic Plast Surg., Nov-Dec. 28 (6): 383-92. doi:
10.1007/s00266-004-0370-4. Epub 2005 Jan 6. PMID:
15633020, 2004.
8- Strugala V. and Martin R.: Meta-Analysis of Comparative
Trials Evaluating a Prophylactic Single-Use Negative
Pressure Wound Therapy System for the Prevention of
Surgical Site Complications. Surg. Infect (Larchmt), Oct.
18 (7): 810-819. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.156. Epub 2017
Sep 8. PMID: 28885895; PMCID: PMC5649123, 2017.
9- Wilkes R.P., Kilpad D.V., Zhao Y., Kazala R. and McNulty
A.: Closed incision management with negative pressure
wound therapy (CIM): biomechanics. Surg. Innov., Mar.
19 (1): 67-75. doi: 10.1177/1553350611414920. Epub
2011 Aug 25. PMID: 21868417, 2012.
10- Karlakki S.L., Hamad A.K., Whittall C., Graham N.M.,
Banerjee R.D. and Kuiper J.H.: Incisional negative pressure
wound therapy dressings (iNPWTd) in routine primary
hip and knee arthroplasties: A randomised controlled trial.
Bone Joint Res., Aug. 5 (8): 328-37. doi: 10.1302/2046-
3758.58.BJR-2016-0022.R1. PMID: 27496913; PMCID:
PMC5013893, 2016.
11- Pellino G., Sciaudone G., Candilio G., De Fatico G.S.,
Landino I., Della Corte A., Guerniero R., Benevento R.,
Santoriello A., Campitiello F., Selvaggi F. and Canonico
S.: Preventive NPWT over closed incisions in general
surgery: Does age matter? Int. J. Surg., 12 (Suppl 2): S64-
S68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.378. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
PMID: 25159226, 2014.
12- Niimi Y., Mori S. and Takeuchi M.: A New Procedure for
Wrapped-Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Congestion
After Arterialized Venous Flap Surgery. Clin. Med.
Insights Case Rep., Dec. 13 (10): 1179547617747279.
doi: 10.1177/1179547617747279. PMID: 29270041; PMCID:
PMC5731612, 2017.
13- Ray E., Mitchell S.L. and Cordeiro P.G.: Miniature Negative
Pressure Dressings on Forearm Donor Sites after
Radial Forearm Flap Harvest. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob
Open, Jun. 15; 6 (6): e1838. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000
000001838. PMID: 30276061; PMCID: PMC6157936,
2018.
14- Galiano R.D., Hudson D., Shin J., van der Hulst R.,
Tanaydin V., Djohan R., Duteille F., Cockwill J., Megginson
S. and Huddleston E.: Incisional Negative Pressure
Wound Therapy for Prevention of Wound Healing Complications
Following Reduction Mammaplasty. Plast
Reconstr Surg Glob Open, Jan. 12; 6 (1): e1560, 2018.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001560. Erratum in: Plast
Reconstr Surg Glob Open, Mar. 23; 6 (2): e1720. PMID:
29464150; PMCID: PMC5811280, 2018.
15- Tanaydin V., Beugels J., Andriessen A., Sawor J.H. and
van der Hulst R.R.W.J.: Randomized Controlled Study
Comparing Disposable Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy
with Standard Care in Bilateral Breast Reduction Mammoplasty
Evaluating Surgical Site Complications and
Scar Quality. Aesthetic Plast. Surg., Aug. 42 (4): 927-
935, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1095-0. Epub 2018
Feb. 13. Erratum in: Aesthetic Plast Surg. Apr. 2. PMID:
29442143; PMCID: PMC6097780, 2018.
16- Holt R. and Murphy J.: PICO™ incision closure in oncoplastic
breast surgery: A case series. Br. J. Hosp. Med.
(Lond), Apr. 76 (4): 217-23. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2015.
76.4.217. PMID: 25853353, 2015.
17- Beausang E., Floyd H., Dunn K.W., Orton C.I. and Ferguson
M.W.: A new quantitative scale for clinical scar
assessment. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., Nov. 102 (6): 1954-
61. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199811000-00022. PMID:
9810991, 1998.
18- Karcioglu O., Topacoglu H., Dikme O. and Dikme O.: A
systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to
use? Am. J. Emerg. Med., Apr. 36(4):707-714. doi:
10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 6. PMID:
29321111, 2018.
19- Manahan M.A., Buretta K.J., Chang D., Mithani S.K.,
Mallalieu J. and Shermak M.A.: An outcomes analysis
of 2142 breast reduction procedures. Ann. Plast. Surg.,
Mar. 74 (3): 289-92. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31829d
2261. PMID: 25668497, 2015.
20- Kemalog˘lu C.A. and Özocak H.: Comparative Outcomes
of Inferior Pedicle and Superomedial Pedicle Technique
with Wise Pattern Reduction in Gigantomastic Patients.
Ann. Plast. Surg. Mar. 80 (3): 217-222. doi: 10.1097/
SAP.0000000000001231. PMID: 28984653, 2018.
21- Hudson D.A., Adams K.G., Van Huyssteen A., Martin R.
and Huddleston E.M.: Simplified negative pressure wound
therapy: Clinical evaluation of an ultraportable, no-canister
system. Int. Wound J., Apr. 12 (2): 195-201. doi:
10.1111/iwj.12080. Epub 2013 May 7. PMID: 23647737;
PMCID: PMC7950749, 2015.
22- Scalise A., Calamita R., Tartaglione C., Pierangeli M.,
Bolletta E., Gioacchini M., Gesuita R. and Di Benedetto
G.: Improving wound healing and preventing surgical
site complications of closed surgical incisions: a possible
role of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. A
systematic review of the literature. Int. Wound J., Dec.
13 (6): 1260-1281. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12492. Epub 2015
Oct 1. PMID: 26424609; PMCID: PMC7950088, 2016.
23- Roehl K., Craig E.S., Gómez V. and Phillips L.G.: Breast
reduction: Safe in the morbidly obese? Plast. Reconstr.
Surg., Aug. 122 (2): 370-378. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013
e31817d60f4. PMID: 18626352, 2008.
106 Vol. 46, No. 1 / Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Improving Reduction Mammoplasty
24. O'Leary D.P., Peirce C., Anglim B., Burton M., Concannon
E., Carter M., Hickey K. and Coffey J.C.: Prophylactic
Negative Pressure Dressing Use in Closed Laparotomy
Wounds Following Abdominal Operations: A Randomized,
Controlled, Open-label Trial: The P.I.C.O. Trial. Ann.
Surg., Jun. 265 (6): 1082-1086. doi: 10.1097/SLA.
0000000000002098. PMID: 27926575, 2017.
25- Condé-Green A., Chung T.L., Holton L.H. 3rd, Hui-Chou
H.G., Zhu Y., Wang H., Zahiri H. and Singh D.P.: Incisional
negative-pressure wound therapy versus conventional
dressings following abdominal wall reconstruction: A
comparative study. Ann. Plast. Surg., Oct. 71 (4): 394-7.
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824c9073. PMID: 22868327,
2013.

Statistics
Article View: 255
PDF Download: 749