SOUAYAH, H. (2022). The notion of appreciation in space design’s approach: from conception to reception and perception. test, 12(2), 343-347. doi: 10.12816/idj.2022.222694
Hajer SOUAYAH. "The notion of appreciation in space design’s approach: from conception to reception and perception". test, 12, 2, 2022, 343-347. doi: 10.12816/idj.2022.222694
SOUAYAH, H. (2022). 'The notion of appreciation in space design’s approach: from conception to reception and perception', test, 12(2), pp. 343-347. doi: 10.12816/idj.2022.222694
SOUAYAH, H. The notion of appreciation in space design’s approach: from conception to reception and perception. test, 2022; 12(2): 343-347. doi: 10.12816/idj.2022.222694

The notion of appreciation in space design’s approach: from conception to reception and perception

International Design Journal
Article 27, Volume 12, Issue 2 - Serial Number 44, March and April 2022, Pages 343-347    PDF (1.06 M)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.12816/idj.2022.222694
Author
Hajer SOUAYAH1, 2
1Doctor in design, science and technology, Department of space Design, University of Sousse
2Professor-researcher at the Higher Institute of Fine Arts in Sousse, Tunisia
Abstract
This article aims to discuss about the notion of appreciation in the domestic space design’s approach. It is a connection between persons and their private space. This puts in tension several probabilities of approaches. On the one hand, there is the subjectivist approach, which supposes that the appreciation is due to personal factors. On the other hand, there is the objectivist position. This position claims that appreciation comes from the qualities of space: aesthetic, kinesthetic, sensory, or functional qualities. The third approach, the heterocentric approach, which focuses on others and the view of others. Then, we talk about external causes, social factors, fashion, trends and economic issues. Our research hypothesis is about interactionism. We suppose that we cannot limit the notion of appreciation only in these angles: the subjectivist, objectivist, or relativist. Several factors participate in this process. What makes the difference from one person to another is the position of one factor in relation to another. This positioning in fact defines the comfort and well-being of each space receiver, which is an image of his culture. The position can be “in cascade or in juxtaposition”. Indeed, our culture defines all our personal filters, our memories, our spatial experiences and trends that we live. The notion of appreciation is all about interaction. This interaction is the image of our general culture.
Keywords
Appreciation; Culture; Design; Reception; Domestic; Space
References
  1. ARNHEIN  Rudolf, (1986) , Dynamics of architectural form, Pierre Mardaga Editeur
  2. BACHELARD G, (1961), The formation of the scientific mind, Paris, philosophical bookseller
  3. Deboulet A., (1999). Introduction. "Popular aesthetics", The LAUA notebooks, Places
  4. Commons, N ° 5
  5. Duclos, D, (1977) From the notion of Cultural Model to the concepts of the practice of everyday life. Act of the seminar "Cultural models and habitat", Institute of the environment
  6. Eleb, M., and Chatelet, A.-M., Do architects take lifestyles into account? Evolution of lifestyles and housing architecture, (Construction and architecture plan, “Cité-Projets” program. Research No42 under the direction of Marion Segaud). Ministry of Housing, Paris, 1993
  7. Huet, B., (1977). Cultural models and architecture. Proceedings of the seminar “Cultural Models and Habitat, Environment Institute, (04 Feb)
  8. MASSABUAU.J, (2002), From comfort to well-being The interior dimension, Harmattan
  9. Pinson, D,(2002), Housing design. Housing and Habitat Dictionary,(under the direction of Marion Segaud, Jacques Brun, Jean-Claude Briant). EditionsArmand Colin, Paris
  10. SCHAEFFER Jean Marie, (2015), Aesthetic experience, Gallimard editions
Statistics
Article View: 325
PDF Download: 364