تقصي سلوک المشرفيـن وسلوک المواطنة التنظيمية عند مرؤوسيهم في ضوء قطاعي التجزئة والتصنيع بالمملکة العربية السعودية

باسهل, عبد الرحمن سميـر; الشهري, محمد غرمان; باجبع, صالح محمد

doi:10.21608/aja.2022.223173

	تقصي سلوک المشرفيـن وسلوک المواطنة التنظيمية عند مرؤوسيهم في ضوء قطاعي التجزئة والتصنيع بالمملکة العربية السعودية
المجلة العربية للإدارة
Article 14, Volume 42, Issue 1, March 2022, Pages 299-314 PDF (314.96 K)
Document Type: بحوث باللغة العربیة
DOI: 10.21608/aja.2022.223173
Authors
عبد الرحمن سميـر باسهل¹; محمد غرمان الشهري²; صالح محمد باجبع³
¹أستاذ مساعد - موارد بشرية وسلوک تنظيمي، قسم إدارة الموارد البشرية، کلية الاقتصاد والإدارة، جامعة الملک عبد العزيـز، المملکة العربية السعودية
²کلية الاقتصاد والإدارة، جامعة الملک عبد العزيـز، المملکة العربية السعودية
³أستاذ مساعد - إدارة أعمال، قسم إدارة الأعمال، کلية الاقتصاد والإدارة، جامعة الملک عبد العزيـز، المملکة العربية السعودية
Abstract
لقد سعت الدراسة الحالية إلى فهم طريقة تصور الأفراد العامليـن في شرکات تجارة التجزئة والتصنيع لسلوک مشرفيهم، وفهم إلى أي مدى قد يحفزهم ذلک التصور أو يثنيهم عن إظهار سلوک المواطنة التنظيمية (OCB). تم جمع البيانات باستخدام نهج نوعي يشمل 22 مقابلة مع موظفيـن يعملون في تجارة التجزئة والتصنيع. وتم تحليل المقابلات المکتوبة بشکل موضوعي وأسفر ذلک عن تشکيل موضوعات أساسية وفرعية تتعلق بالعوامل التي تشجع أو تثني عن سلوک المواطنة التنظيمية. تم تحديد کلٍ من دعم الموظفيـن والشعور بالثقة والأمن والتقديـر والإنصاف والتواصل الجيد والاحتـرام بوصفها العوامل التي تؤثـر بشکل إيجابي على سلوک المواطنة التنظيمية. وأشارت النتائج إلى أن العدوانية اللفظية وانعدام الثقة والظلم واللامبالاة ونقص المعرفة کلها أمور تؤثـر سلبًا على سلوک المواطنة التنظيمية للموظفيـن. تعد هذه الورقة إضافة مهمة إلى مجموعة المؤلفات فيما يتعلق بالعوامل التي تؤثـر على سلوک المواطنة التنظيمية للمرؤوسيـن في سياق سعودي. ويمکن للمؤسسات أن تطبيق نتائج هذه الدراسة على سياستها لأن سلوک المواطنة التنظيمية مهم لنجاح أي عمل تجاري. نظرًا لأن دراسة سلوک المواطنة التنظيمية عادة ما تتم في سياق غربي وعن طريق الأساليب الکمية؛ لذا فإن قيمة هذه الدراسة تتمثل في أنها تبحث في سلوک المواطنة التنظيمية في سياق شرق أوسطي - وبشکل أکثـر تحديداً في سياق المملکة العربية السعودية، کما أنها تستخدم أساليب نوعية لخلق فهم عميق للعوامل المشجعة على سلوک المواطنة التنظيمية، والمثبطة عنه. The current study sought to understand how individuals working in the retail and manufacturing business perceive their supervisors’ behavior and how this encourages or discourages their organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB). Data were gathered using a qualitative approach involving 22 interviews with employees working in the retail and manufacturing business. Transcribed interviews were thematically analyzed and resulted in the formation of themes and subthemes relating to the factors contributing or discouraging OCB. Employee support, feelings of trust and security, recognition, fairness, proper communication, and respect were identified as the factors positively influencing OCB Findings suggested that verbal aggression, distrust and unfairness, apathy, and lack of knowledge negatively affect employees’ OCB. This paper adds to the body of literature on which factors influence subordinates’ OCB in a Saudi context. Organizations may want to apply the results of this study to their policy as OCB is important for the success of any business. OCB is usually studied in a western context and by means of quantitative methods. The value of this study is that it researches OCB in a Middle Eastern context – more specifically in the context of Saudi Arabia – and that it deploys qualitative methods to create an in-depth understanding of the factors encouraging and discouraging OCB.
Keywords
المملکة العربية السعودية; سلوک المواطنة التنظيمية; سلوک المشرفيـن; التبادل الاجتماعي; الانغماس الوظيفي; Saudi Arabia; Organizational Citizenship Behavior; OCB; Social Exchange; Employee Engagement; Leadership

References
Ackfeldt, A. L. and Coote, L. (2005). “A study of organisational citizenship behaviours in a retail setting”, Journal of Business Research, 58: 151-159. Ahmadi, P.; Forouzandeh, S. & Kahreh, M. S. (2010). “The relationship between OCB and social exchange constructs”, European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 19, 107-120. Altuntas, S. & Baykal, U. (2010). “Relationship between nurses’ organizational trust levels and their organizational citizenship behaviors”, Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 42 (2), 186-194. Ariani, D. W. (2013). “The relationship between employee engagement, organizational citizenship behavior, and counterproductive work behavior”, International Journal of Business Administration, 4 (2), 46. Arnaud, S. and Wasieleski, D. (2014). “Corporate humanistic responsibility: Social performance through managerial discretion of the HRM”, Journal of Business Ethics, 120: 313-334. Blau, P. M. (1968). “Social exchange”, International encyclopedia of the social sciences, 7 , 452-457. Castro, C. B.; Armario, E. M. & Ruiz, D. M. (2004). “The influence of employee organizational citizenship behavior on customer loyalty”, International Journal of Service Industry Management. Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). “Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research”, In: Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Ed.). Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nded, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. Eisenberger, R. and Fasolo, P. (1990). “Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment and innovation”, Journal of App. Psy., 75 (1), 51-60. Etikan, I.; Musa, S. A. & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). “Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling”, American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5 (1), 1-4. French, J. R. P. Jr; Caplan, R. D. & Van Harrison, R. (1982). The Mechanism of Job Stress and Strain. Chichester, UK: Wiley. Haque, M. M. & Azim, M. T. (2009). “The effect of recognition practice over affective commitment and OCB: An empirical study in Bangladesh”, Independent Business Review, 2 (2), 65-81. Homans. (1958). Social Exchange Theory. Retrieved from http://www.fsc.yorku.ca/york/istheory/wiki/index.php/Social_exchange_theory Kahn, W. A. (1990). “Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work”, Academy of Management Journal, 33 (4), 692-724. Kandlousi, N. S. A. E.; Ali, A. J. & Abdollahi, A. (2010). “Organizational citizenship behavior in concern of communication satisfaction: The role of the formal and informal communication”, International Journal of Business and Management, 5 (10), 51. Kasa, M. & Hassan, Z. (2017). “The relationship of burnout dimensions with organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) among bank employees in Sarawak: Mediating role of flow experience”, International Journal of Business and Society, 18 (S4), 685-691. Katz, D. (1964). “The motivational basis of organizational behavior”, Behavioral Science, 9 (2), 131-146. Kramer, M. W. (2017). “Supervisor-subordinate communication”, The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication, 1-14. Ma, E. & Qu, H. (2011). “Social exchanges as motivators of hotel employees’ organizational citizenship behavior: The proposition and application of a new three-dimensional framework”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30 (3), 680-688. MacKenzie, S. B.; Podsakoff, P. M. & Fetter, R. (1993). “The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on evaluations of salesperson performance”, Journal of Marketing, 57 (1), 70-80. Meglino, B. M. (1977). “Stress and performance: Are they always incompatible?”, Supervisory Management, 22, 2-12. Memon, M. A.; Sallaeh, R.; Baharom, M. N. R.; Nordin, S. M. & Ting, H. (2017). “The relationship between training satisfaction, organisational citizenship behaviour, and turnover intention”, Journal of Organizational Effectiveness. 4(3), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-03-2017-0025 Men, L. R. & Yue, C. A. (2019). “Creating a positive emotional culture: Effect of internal communication and impact on employee supportive behaviors”, Public Relations Review, 45 (3), 101764. Moorman, R. (1991). “Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845-855. Muhammad, A. H. (2014). “Perceived organizational support and organizational citizenship behavior: the case of Kuwait”, International Journal of Business Administration, 5 (3), 59. Organ, D.; Podsakoff, P. and MacKenzie, S. (2006). Organisational citizenship behaviour: Its nature, antecedents and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Organ, D. W. (1990a). “The subtle significance of job satisfaction”, Clinical Laboratory Management Review, 4 (1), 94-98. Organ, D. W. (1990b). “The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 43-72. Perreira, T. & Berta, W. (2015). “Increasing OCB: The influence of commitment, organizational support and justice”, Strategic HR Review. 14(1/2), 13-21. doi:10.1108/SHR-01-2015-003. Podsakoff, N. P.; Whiting, S. W.; Podsakoff, P. M. & Blume, B. D. (2009). “Individual-and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 (1), 122. Podsakoff, P. M.; Ahearne, M. & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). “Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82 (2), 262. Porter, L. W.; Steers, R. M.; Mowday, R. T. & Boulian, P. V. (1974). “Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 59 (5), 603-609. Rasheed, A.; Jehanzeb, K. & Rasheed, M. F. (2013). “An investigation of the antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviour: Case of Saudi Arabia”, International Journal of Psychological Studies, 5 (1), 128. Redman, T. & Snape, E. (2005). “I to wed: The role of consciousness transformation in compassion and altruism”, Journal of Management Studies, 42 (2), 2200-2380. Rego, A. & Cunha, M. (2008). “Organisational citizenship behaviours and effectiveness: An empirical study in two small insurance companies”, The Service Industries Journal, 28(4): 541-554. Rhoades, L. & Eisenberger, R. (2002). “Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (4), 698-714. Santos Jr, H. P.; Black, A. M. & Sandelowski, M. (2015). “Timing of translation in cross-language qualitative research”, Qualitative Health Research, 25 (1), 134-144. Singh, A. K.; Singh, A. P.; Kumar, S. & Gupta, V. K. (2015). “Role of perceived organizational support in the relationship between role overload and organizational citizenship behavior”, Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 41 (1), 77. Sinnappan, L. P. & Amulraj, M. (2014). “Impact of rewards and recognition and empowerment on organizational citizenship behaviors among technical engineers”, Management Studies and Economic Systems, 54 (1399), 1-7. Smith, C.; Organ, D. W. & Near, J. P. (1983). “Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 68 (4), 653-663. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications. Suresh, S. & Venkatammal, P. (2010). “Antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviour”, Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 36 (2), 276-286. Symon, G. & Cassell, C. (2012). “Assessing qualitative research”, In: Symon, G. & Cassell, C. (Ed.). Organizational qualitative research: Core methods and current challenges. Sage, London. Tan, H. H. & Tan, C. S. (2000). «Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization”, Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 126 (2), 241-260. Van Dyne, L.; Kossek, E. & Lobel, S. (2007). “Less need to be there: Cross-level effects of work practices that support work-life flexibility and enhance group processes and group-level OCB”, Human Relations, 60 (8), 1123-1154. Wang, Z. (2014). “Perceived supervisor support and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of organizational commitment”, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5 (1).
Statistics Article View: 315 PDF Download: 300