(2021). Infrapubic Approach Versus Penoscrotal Approach For Malleable Penile Prosthesis Implantation As A Management Of Erectile Dysfunction: A Comparative Randomized Study. test, 1(2), 53-64. doi: 10.21608/aumj.2021.228328
. "Infrapubic Approach Versus Penoscrotal Approach For Malleable Penile Prosthesis Implantation As A Management Of Erectile Dysfunction: A Comparative Randomized Study". test, 1, 2, 2021, 53-64. doi: 10.21608/aumj.2021.228328
(2021). 'Infrapubic Approach Versus Penoscrotal Approach For Malleable Penile Prosthesis Implantation As A Management Of Erectile Dysfunction: A Comparative Randomized Study', test, 1(2), pp. 53-64. doi: 10.21608/aumj.2021.228328
Infrapubic Approach Versus Penoscrotal Approach For Malleable Penile Prosthesis Implantation As A Management Of Erectile Dysfunction: A Comparative Randomized Study. test, 2021; 1(2): 53-64. doi: 10.21608/aumj.2021.228328

Infrapubic Approach Versus Penoscrotal Approach For Malleable Penile Prosthesis Implantation As A Management Of Erectile Dysfunction: A Comparative Randomized Study

Aswan University Medical Journal
Volume 1, Issue 2, December 2021, Pages 53-64    PDF (969.96 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/aumj.2021.228328
Statistics
Article View: 115
PDF Download: 167