RESPONSE OF SUNFLOWER TO BIOFERTILIZATION AND DIATOMS UNDER SALINE CONDITION.

CONCLUSION

The above-mentioned findings suggest that biofertilization with Azotobacters and diatoms has a significant enhancing effect on sunflower plant growth and oil yield. On the other hand, mixed biofertilization in combination with diatom spraying may be recommended for increasing sunflower productivity. By fixing nitrogen, solubilizing phosphate, and generating exopolysaccharides, siderophore, and phytohormone, Azotobacters can help plants grow and develop under salt stress.

 

Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022                                                 58-79

RESPONSE OF SUNFLOWER TO BIOFERTILIZATION AND DIATOMS UNDER SALINE CONDITION.

 

Samah M. Abdelaziz

Soil fertility and Microbiology Department., Desert Research Center,p.o.Box:1.El-Matareya 11753, Cairo, Egypt

E-mail- Samah.drc@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

The study's purpose was to identify and isolate a salinity-tolerant Azotobacter chroococcum strain that would be used as a biofertilizer. Different salinity-affected sites in North Sinai,  Ras Sudr and Sahle El-Tina, were sampled for soil. Under saline conditions, two extremely effective halotolerant Azotobacters were tested for their nitrogen fixing, phosphate dissolving, and synthesis of indol, gibrillin, and siderophores at (3 % NaCl). A field experiment in Sahle El-Tina, North Sinai, looked at the effects of biofertilization and Ditoms foliar spray on the development and production of sunflower cultivar Sakha 53. Sunflower yield, oil content, and chemical content were increased significantly when biofertilizer and diatoms interacted. Also, the interaction between diatom foliar spray and biofertilization treatments had a significant impact on all yield and yield components. In addition, total microbial counts, CO₂ evolution, and azotobacter counts in the rhizosphere soil indicated significant microbial activity, and enzymatic activity (Dehydrogenase) revealed a good response in all treatments compared to the uninoculated control.

Key Words: Sunflower, Salinity tolerant, Biofertilization, Azotobacter chroococcum, Ditoms.

INTRODUCTION

The sunflower plant (Helianthus annuus L.) is one of Egypt's most important oil crops (Abdel Razik et al., 2021; Ahmed et al., 2022‏). The seed includes 25-48 percent oil and 20-27 percent protein, and it has a high percentage of polyunsaturated fatty acids and a low cholesterol level. Sunflower is fairly susceptible to soil salinity, with an E.C of 1.7 dS/m tolerance limit. (Zulfiqar et al., (2021). It attracted a lot of attention since it could be grown in a variety of soils and climate conditions in recently reclaimed soils, and it could supply the growing need for vegetable oil. (Islam et al., 2022; Ait Kaci Ahmed et al., 2022).

Salinity is a primary abiotic stress or that affects plant health and well-being among the different abiotic stresses (Sumbul et al., 2020). Salinity disrupts the water and ionic movement of plant cells, hampering plant growth, morphology, physiology, and other activities, ultimately resulting in plant death (Hailu & Mehari 2021 ).

 

59                                                         gypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022

It is required to generate stress-tolerant crop kinds by genetic engineering and plant breeding, but this is a long drawn out process, whereas microbial inoculation to relieve stress in plants could be a more cost-effective, ecologically friendly alternative that could be available sooner. (Mashabela et al., 2022). Plants are frequently subjected to many pressures in nature, and their ability to survive is determined on how they respond to these challenges. Plant growth promoting microorganisms (PGPM) that improve plant stress tolerance are a promising new technique for long-term agriculture production Schmidt et al., (2022).   Plant-associated microbes may play a key role in giving abiotic stress resistance. Rhizosphirc bacteria, and symbiotic fungus are among these creatures. They work through a diversity of methods, including new genes in plants and stimulating the osmotic response. (Gamalero  & Glick  2022).

 

Beneficial bacteria, for example, are being considered as a possible treatment. They have an impact on plant growth and biochemical indicators, as well as helping to the production of organic compounds that protect plants from abiotic stress. Plant growth-promoting beneficial bacteria, or PGPB, has also been shown to improve plant health by reducing biotic and abiotic stress. (Sumbul et al., 2020). Various mechanisms that affect plant development and yield performance are thought to occur at the soil-plant-microbe interfaces. The use of PGPB is thought to be highly essential in improving plant health by minimizing stresses in hostile environments (Jabin 2016 and Sumbul et al., 2020). Currently, Azotobacter spp. (nitrogen-fixing bacterial strains) are being used successfully in large-scale sustainable agriculture. (Mahanty  et al., 2017;  Kour  et al., 2020 and Gogoi et al., 2021). Nitrogen fixation, siderophore generation, IAA and exopolysaccharide production are all characteristics of Azotobacter spp., which improve plant health and produce indol-3-acetic acid and exopolysaccharides (EPS) (Naitam & Kaushik 2021). Apart from the main traits that increase the plant's tolerance index in hostile environments, Azotobacter spp. has a variety of other characteristics (Shahid & Khan 2022). 

Diatomites de Mozambique (DDM) is a sedimentary rock discovered in Mozambique that is primarily composed of fossilised freshwater diatoms. It's largely made up of soluble silicat oxide (SiO₂) 86 to 89 % that plants may use, as well as a few trace elements. Because it improves the physical structure of soil, aerates the root zone of plants, lowers leaching and runoff, and so increases soil water retention and reduces watering, it is considered a complete, long-lasting, recyclable, reusable, and ecologically friendly soil fertilizer and enhancer. As a result, diatomite promotes the growth of stronger, healthier, higher-yielding plants that mature faster and acquire self-resistance to both abiotic and biotic stresses. Abdalla, 2011a ; Safwat, et aL., 2016 and Gokavi et al., (2021). 

 

Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022                                                      60

This research is conducted to evaluate the application of  Azotobacter spp. As a biofertilizer and diatoms  to enhance the productivity of sunflower oil plant in growth in saline soil.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1- Isolation and characterization of Azotobacter isolates:

The target isolates were isolated from the rhizosphere soil of wheat and barley plants grown in Ras Sudr and Sahle El-Tina, North Sinai, with electrical conductivity (EC: 10.8 and 12.1 dS/m) and identified according to Bergey,s manual of systematic bacteriology classification of Brenner et al., (2005) and Vos et al.,(2009). Cell morphology, motility, gram reaction, catalase production, starch hydrolysis, nitrate reduction, sucrose, mannitol, benzoate as a sole carbon source, ammonium sulphate, KNO₃ and yeast extract as a sole nitrogen source, production of non diffusible pigment, and pH values were among the most important tests.

Different growth promoter traits for two Azotobacter isolates were investigated at 3% NaCl concentration including:

- Nitrogen fixation ability by investigating the nitrogenase enzyme activity (acetylene reduction technique) in Ashby's medium as described by Hardy et al., (1973).

- Indole acetic acid (IAA) production using spectrophotometer as
described by Ehmann, (1977).

- Gibberellins production in ethyl acetate extraction using HCl and Folin reagent according to the method described by Graham and Henderson (1960).

- The phosphorus solubilization index (PSI) and soluble phosphorus quantity were calculated on Pikovskaya medium using the methods of Page et al., (1982) and Kumar (1999). Tabatabai and Brimner (1969) method was used to calculate phosphatase activity after three days of bacterial inoculation . Phosphatase enzyme units were defined as the quantity of enzyme that hydrolyzed 1mM of p-nitrophenol hour-1.

- Siderophores were produced using the procedures described by (Neilands, 1981).

Effect of Salinity on proline production of the two Azotobacter isoletes:
  The two bacterial isolates were investigated for their proline production at different concentrations of salt ranging from (1%, 2%, 3%,4% and 5% NaCl).

Preparation of Azotobacter inocula and seed inoculation:

         Synergistic effect between the two selected effective Azotobacter isolates was done according to Shirling and Gottlieb, (1966).

 

61                                                      Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022

Fresh liquid cultures 48 h old from pure local strains of A. chroococcum (Az1) and A.chroococcum (Az2) from each strain were prepared to obtain the desired concentration (1.8x10⁸ cells/ml) and were kept at 4˚C until used. A mixture of the both strains was prepared just before inoculation by adding equal volum of the culture of each strain (1:1v/v) to inoculate the seeds of sunflower.

 

Seeds were successively washed and immersed for 30 minutes in heavy cell suspensions of the two strains of Azotobacter chroococcum (10⁸ cells ml^–1) at the ratio of (1:1v/v) , carboxy methyl cellulose solution 0.5 % was used as an adhesive agent. Seeds of control treatments were soaked in water only. The inoculated seeds were air dried at room temperature for 2 hours before sowing. An additional dose was applied twenty one days later once again to soil.

Diatoms application

DDM diatomite is a natural diatomaceous earth originated from fossilized remains of fresh water diatoms with cell wall impregnated with silica. It is pHneutral and composed mainly of SiO

₂

 (86-89%) in asoluble form beneficial to plants. After 40 days from planting, diatoms were administered as a foliar spray at a rate of 1 kg/fed. We used a knapsack sprayer with a 300 L/fed water capacity. Major Chemical Elements for diatoms SiO

₂

 (89.00%), Al

₂

O

₃

 (5.95%), Fe

₂

O

₃

(0.88%), CaO (0.10%), K

₂

O (0.63%), MgO (0.20%), Na

₂

O (0.32%), TiO

₂

 (0.29%) and H

₂

O    (‹3%). 

Field Experiments

         The field experiment was done in Sahle El-Tina, North Sinai, during (2020/21) to evaluate the effect of two biofertilization bacteria on sunflower Sakha 53 growth and productivity. The experiment was designed with three replicates and was totally randomised.

Organic manure and calcium superphosphate fertilizers were added during soil preparation at the rate of 20 m³ and 80 kg/fed (15.5% P₂O₅ ) respectively, 35 kg of potassium sulphate (50.0% K₂SO₄) was added at flowering stage, whereas nitrogen fertilizer was applied as ammonium sulfate (20.5% N)  at rate of 120 kg/feddan for full of recommended dose and 60 kg/feddan for half of recommended dose (1/3 of the amount was incorporated in dry soil before sowing, 1/3 was added one month after
sowing and the rest was added one week pre flowering stage). This area is irrigated through El-Salam Canal (Nile water mixed with agricultural drainage water at a rate of 1:1), soil was directly irrigated after planting to provide suitable moisture for the inoculants. Thinning practices were conducted 21 days after planting to secure one plant per hill. Other practices for growing sunflower were conducted as recommended.

The treatments used could be summarized as following:

1. Control without bacterial inoculation + full dose of (N,P,K).

 

Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022                                                      62

2. Biofertilizer (mix of two Azotobacter spp.) + (half dose of N, full dose of P,K).

 

3. Diatoms + (half dose of N, full dose of P,K).

4. Biofertilizer + Diatoms + (half dose of N, full dose of P,K).

Soil mechanical and chemical analysis was represented in Table (1a,1b). Chemical analysis of irrigated water was represented in Table (2).

Table 1a. Soil mechanical analysis at two depths.

 

Table 1b.Soil chemical analysis at two depths.

 

Table 2. Chemical analysis of El-Salam canal water.

 

Measurement of plant parameters:

The following traits were estimated after harvesting: Plant height, fresh weight, dried weight, head diameter, 1000-grain weight, seed weight/plant, and seeds yield /fed. Oil yield / fed. was calculated using a British pharmacopoeia (1936). Oil extraction follows the IUPAC standard procedure (Anonymous, 1987), oil was extracted from the ground seed material using 500 mL n- hexane in a Soxhlet device. Oil content (%) = Oil content (g)/seed weight (g) x 100

For chemical analysis of sunflower seeds: Nitrogen was evaluated using the micro-Kjeldahl method (Bremner and Mulvaney 1982) for sunflower seed chemical analysis. As mentioned in, phosphorus and potassium were measured using a spectrophotometer and a flame photometer, respectively (Page et al., 1982).

Protein content of seeds: Seed nitrogen content was evaluated using the Kjeldahl method, and protein content was estimated using the formula: Protein (%) = Nitrogen content x 6.25.  The content of proline in leaf tissue was determined using the method of (Bates et al., 1973). Total antioxidant activity was measured in milligrammes of ascorbic acid equivalents (AAE) per gramme of extract (Prieto et al., 1999).While Ca, Mg and other micronutrients content, were determined by the Ionic Coupled Plasma according to (Ure, 1995)

 

63                                                      Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022

For microbiological analysis soil samples from the sunflower rhizosphere were collected at harvesting stage and analysed for total count of microorganisms using the decimal plate method technique as described by Nautiyal (1999). Azotobacter densities were determined using nitrogen deficient medium as described by Abd El-Malek and Ishac (1968). Casida et al., (1964) established a method for determining Dehydrogenase activity in soil samples

 

Statistical analysis

The results of this study were statistically examined using Statistix version 9 computer software, and differences between treatment alternatives were declared significant when they were more than the least significant differences (LSD) at the 5% stage. (Analytical software, 2008).                                                                                          

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Isolation and identification of Azotobacter.

Two Azotobacter (nitrogen-fixing bacterium) isolates were recovered and coded (Az-1, Az-2) based on their isolation location. These isolates were identified according to Holt et al., (1994).Some biochemical and morphological characteristics of Azotobacter isolates were shown in Table(3). The two isolates were ovoid to rod-shaped and formed cysts in pairs. Gram negative, aerobic, nitrogen fixer in aerobic conditions, oxidase positive microbial strain. These isolates were identified as Azotobacter chroococcum based on the following characteristics and could be distinguished from other Azotobacter species. The use of various carbon sources and the synthesis of yellow brown colours

Table (3): Azotobacter isoletes morphological and physiological characteristics:

 

Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022                                                      64

2- The ability of Azotobacter strains as plant growth promoters:

 

Only data of the highly potential bacteria were recorded as shown in table (4). The two most successful Azotobacter strains were selected for their ability to promote plant development. Strain(Az-1) was more active in nitrogenase activities, indol acitic acids and gibberellins production which recorded 93.6 n.mole C₂H₄ /ml/h at 3% NaCl, 153 μg/ml and 26.3 μg/ml, respectively.

Strain (Az-2) recorded 80 μmole C₂H₄ /ml/h at 3% NaCl, 51 μg/ml and 17 μg/ml respectively, On the other hand, isolate(Az-2) was more active in Phosphate solubilization and siderophores production which recorded 430.83 ppm and 59.0 (µg/ml, 410nm) than  isolate(Az-1) which recorded 293.13ppm and  35.2(µg/ml, 410nm), respectively.

Table (4) Biochemical and microbial activities for selected N₂-fixers Azotobacter chroococcum

 

3- Proline synthesis by selected strains in response to increased NaCl concentration.

To evaluate the effect of increased osmotic stress on proline production, the selected strains were grown in varied concentrations of sodium chloride (1 %, 2 %, 3 %, 4 %, and 5%).

Increased NaCl concentration greatly increased proline synthesis as showen in fig (1); these findings were consistent with those reported by Mahmoud, et al., (2020). Proline accumulation, which is linked to improved plant growth, may result in increased leaf water potential as well as protection from salt-induced oxidative stress (Farouk and Al-Huqail 2022).

Synergistic effect between selected strains:

Both selected strains compatible to grow together, where each strain grew well in the presence of the other strain without any restrictions, resulting in a synergistic behaviour that maximised the benefits gained from selected strains over each microbe.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure (1) Effect of increased NaCl concentration on proline production by selected strains.

Growth traits:

Growth parameters values during 2020 and 2021 season were shown in table (5,6).

Results indicated that gradual increase in sunflower plant height, shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight ,  head diameter, seed weight and Weight of 1000 seed.

The combined application of mixed treatment of biofertilization and diatoms foliar followed by biofertilization and diatoms individually yielded the maximum plant height, the plants in the control group are the tiniest ones.

The stimulatory effects could be related to the stimulation of microflora growth, which includes various plant growth stimulators, biological nitrogen fixation, and increased accessible phosphorus, all of which help plants grow faster as stated by Sehrawat et al., (2022). The benefits of using silicon in agriculture include increased tolerance to diseases, pests, cold, salt, and toxicity produced by excess Al, Mn, and Fe. A layer of silicon collecting behind the cuticle is responsible for many of these advantages as mentioned by HuaSun et al., (2021) and Christian et al., (2022). The biofertilization and silicon foliar application combination treatments had the greatest impact on growth parameters (Hassan et al., 2021).

Hafez et al., (2021) found that both biofertilizers and silicon foliar spray have a stimulative effect on sunflower growth parameters.Combination of biofertilization and silicon foliar treatment increased the growth. The highest increase was recorded with mixed biofertilization treatment and diatom foliar application, which recorded 191 cm in plant hight, 187 (gm) in shoot fresh weight and 25.8 (gm) in shoot dry weight while control recorded 145cm for plant height, 87(gm)in shoot dry weight and 10,2(gm)in shoot dry weight, respectively.

 

Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022                                                      66

Table (5) Effect of biofertilization and diatoms foliar application on plant hight,  Shoot fresh weight and shoot dry weight of sunflower and halfe dose of N fertilizer at the harvest.                                                                             

 

 

The data in Table (6) showed that plant growth parameters were significantly influenced by the biofertilization, diatoms foliar application and their interaction treatments. In this respect, the superiority of A. chroococcum may be due to its important role in sunflower generative growth and therefore a significant increase in 1000 seed weight which reflected on seeds yield, according to Moradzadeh et al., (2021), A.chroococcum increases accessible nitrogen in the soil and potentially increasing seed number in plants.In this respect, interaction of diatoms with mixed biofertilization treatment recorded the highest values being (20 cm, 22.3 g, 1130 kg and 60 Kg/fed) for head diameter, seed weight/plant, seed weight /fed and weight of 1000 seed respectively. Followed by individual biofertilization and individual diatom foliar application while control gave the lowest values. This significant increase in yield and yield components due to biofertilization along with diatoms application treatments had synergistic effects on subsequent plant growth and stimulate microbial activities beneficial to plant growth and yield.                                                                

The efficiency of biofertilizers supplied to the plant grown with biologically fixed nitrogen, solubilized phosphorus, and produced plant hormones, may stimulate nutrient uptake and photosynthesis, resulting in increased plant growth and yield, may be attributed to their stimulatory effects on yield and yield components. Furthermore, as seen in fig (2) yield and yield characteristics, ditoms may have increased the surface area, number of leaves per plant, and dry matter of sunflower plants, resulting in greater photosynthetic areas and activity, as well as dry matter accumulation in seeds. The increases in sunflower yield and its components are consistent with those seen in other crops as reported by Semida  et al., (2021).

 

67                                                      Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022

Table (6) Effect of biofertilization and diatoms foliar application on head diameter, seed weight per plant, seed weight per fed, percent increase, and weight of 1000 sunflower seeds with half dose of nitrogen fertilizer at the harvest.

 

                

 

Figure (2) Effect of biofertilization and foliar diatom application on sunflower seed yield (kg/fed) at harvest.

 

Data in Table (7) clarified that oil percentage and oil yield of sunflower were significantly affected by silicon foliar application, the promoting effect of mixed biofertilization and diatoms  treatments  extended to both oil % and oil yield as a result to the ability of phosphate dissolving by the mixure of azotobacters to solubilize phosphate and increase its availability for plant metabolism, it exhibited superiority effect in oil yield and oil % compared with A.chroococcum, this results in accordance with Moradzadeh et al., (2021).               

In this respect, sunflower plants which treated with mixtures of A. chroococcum and diatoms showed superiority in oil % and oil yield as compared with other concentrations of diatoms and single biofertilization treatments.                                  

 

Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022                                                      68

Moreover, the highest values of seed oil percentage and oil yield (Kg/fed) were recorded from sunflower plants spraying with diatoms in combination with mixed biofertilization treatment being 42.012 % and 474.828 (Kg/fed) for oil % and oil yield respectively, such significant increase due to improvement in translocation of assimilates. Different studies indicated positive effect of silicon application on the plant growth and development including enhanced pollination, increase dry biomass and final yield (Soleymanifard et al., 2022).  Diatoms lowered salinity stress by either coping with salinity in the rooting medium or inhibiting the mechanism of sodium transport to the leaves (Omer & Abd-Elnaby (2017) and  Garg et al., 2020). Moreover, Si could stimulate growth and yield under saline conditions by increasing plant water status, cell wall thickness, elasticity and strength thus preventing lodging and providing leaf erectness. It also increases the synthesis of RNA and DNA. This situation reduces trans- piration and chlorophyll destruction, whereas it increases CO₂ assimilation rates which eventually resulted in an elevated rate of growth and yield (Abdalla 2011 a). Consentino et al., (2022)  stated that the soluble proteins are increased with better nitrogen supply and favorable growth condition. Kurmanbayeva et al.,. (2022). In photosynthetic active leaf tissue, high levels of the reduced N fraction (protein fraction) were discovered. This is especially true when nitrate supplies are plentiful. These findings show that a high N-rate enhances amino acid synthesis in the leaves, which stimulates protein accumulation rather than oil content in the seed. In comparison to the untreated control, diatom biofertilizer considerably enhanced seed protein content by (18.625%), (12.062 %) as seen in Table (7)

 

Table (7) Effect of biofertilization and diatoms foliar application on Oil%, Oil Yield and Protein % of sunflower seeds using  halfe dose of N fertilizer at the harvest.

 

To understand the protective action of antioxidants under salinity stress, sunflower plants were treated with PGPR producing strains and diatoms followed by measurement of total antioxidant activity. The results presented in table (8) revealed that PGPR strains (Az1and Az2) under salinity soil stress significantly increased total antioxidant activity of sunflower leaves compared to the control. The highest increase was recorded with mixed biofertilization treatment and diatoms foliar application (252.7 µg/g FW) followed by individual biofertilization (190 µg/g FW.), and individual diatoms (189.7 µg/g FW.) compared with control (77.7 µg/g FW.). Proline accumulation is an adaptive response by plants to both general stress and salinity, since it mediates osmotic adjustment at the cellular level, thereby protecting intracellular macromolecules from dehydration, and also because it serves as a hydroxyl radical scavenger (Mukarram et al., 2021 and Ghosh et al., 2022).

 

69                                                      Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022

In the present study, we found that the contents of proline and antioxidant were enhanced in the PGPR-inoculated sunflower plants under saline conditions. Therefore, it is likely that the PGPR strains promoted plant growth under salinity stress by enhancing metabolic defense strategies. On the other hand, diatoms enhanced salt tolerance in plants by enhancing the activity of antioxidant enzymes which, in turn, decreases the permeability of plasma membrane and in the mean time increases its integrity, stability and functioning (Rawat et al., 2021). Plants commonly respond to stress by increasing the production of amino acids and proline whereas Si treatment reduced them (Haghighi & Saharkhiz 2022).

 

Table (8) Effect of biofertilizer and diatoms foliar application treatments on antioxidant and proline in the leaf tissues of sunflower plants.

 

Nutrient contents in sunflower seeds:

Data of the studied macro and micronutrients (N, P ,K, Ca, Mg, B, Mn, Fe and Zn) contents in sunflower seeds are presented in Table (9), mixed biofertilizer and diatoms were found to be highly significantly effective in increasing NPK values of seed (2.98 ,0.882 and 0.860%) respectively comparing to untreated control. Same results were observed with the rest of the studied elements since the mixed treatment significantly influenced the uptake of micronutrients.

The PGPR strains could improve production of plant growth regulators or increase plant nutrient uptake. Omer & Abd-Elnaby (2017) concluded that biofertilizers decreased the hazard effect of salinity and exerted a favorable effect on growth and N, P and K concentration in sunflower seeds. On other hand Quigley et al., (2020) claimed that a great benefit of Si application is that it can balance nutrient element in plant tissue, the highest significant increase in N, P and K concentrations of sunflower seeds was recorded by the interaction of biofertilizer and  diatoms foliar application. Generally the increases in macronutrient concentrations in seeds may be due to the availability of them in the soil as a result of decreasing soil pH and salinity caused by the action of organic materials or biofertilizer (Abdalla 2011 b). The improving effect of the combined treatments attained biofertilizer or diatoms was commonly achieved may be due to lowering soil pH that improve nutrients availability, mobility and ability to uptake by plant roots. In addition, the superiority of applied treatments attained (Biofertilizer+Diatoms) were more attributed to their richness in organic substances that ameliorate soil-moisture regime and the biological soil condition. Cozzolino et al., (2021) pointed out that phytohormones producer bacteria causes pronounced increases for plant root elongation by then uptake of more nutrients via the root system, and hence utilization of N as a result of bio-inoculation.

 

Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022                                                      70

Table (9) Effect of biofertilizer and diatoms foliar application treatments on chemical components  of sunflower seeds.

 

 

Effect of biofertilization and diatoms on soil microbial analysis:              

General microbial activities:

Azotobacter densities: Represented data in Table (10) recorded improvement in azotobacters counts by different treatments as compared with control. Inoculation with the two strains of azotobacters had stimulating effect on Azotobacter counts in rhizosphere. Synergistic effects of biofertilizers application and diatoms spray enhances Azotobacter counts in soil . Interaction of Az1 and Az2 with diatoms foliar application  in mixed treatment recorded the highest counts than control to be 70 and 20×10⁴ cfu/g dry rhizosphere soil for counts respectively. The indirect role of diatoms foliar application on microbial activity in rhizosphere of treated plant reflected on Azotobacter densities in soil. The promoting effect of A. chroococcum application is due not only to nitrogen fixation, but also to the production of plant growth promoting substances, amino acids, organic acids, vitamins, and antimicrobial substances, all of which contribute to increased soil fertility, microbial community, and plant growth (Aasfar et al., 2021 and Kumar & Brar 2021). Total microbial counts slightly increased with adding diatoms which might be due to diatoms foliar spray enhance plant growth, the simulative effect of plant rhizosphere on the adjacent microorganisms leads to increase total microbial counts. Another increase in counts was associated with the use of biofertilizers in the form of mixed treatment as shown in Table (10) The enhancement effect in microbial activity is a good parameter for many soil improvement indicators. For example A. chroococcum produce growth promoting substances, biological nitrogen fixation, organic acids production and other enzymatic activities which enhance plant growth and proliferate lateral roots and root hairs which increase nutrient absorbing surface (Nosheen et al., 2021). The highest counts were associated with mixed treatment biofertilization and diatoms foliar application to be 98×10⁵ cfu/g dry soil followed by individual biofertilizer  being 77followed by individual diatoms foliar application bieng 77 and control recorded the lowest values being 39×10⁵ cfu/g dry soil  at harvest stage of sunflower. These results are compatible with those obtained by Kumar et al., (2021) and Fasusi et al., (2021) who reported that, inoculation with the plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (Azotobcter chroococcum) had stimulation effect on the population of rhizosphere microorganism and increased their numbers by more than 50% at the end of the experiment comparing with the number recorded before planting.

 

71                                                      Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022

Table (10) Effect of biofertilization and diatoms foliar application on Azotobacter densities, total microbial counts and dehydrogense activity in sunflower rhizosphere using half dose of N fertilizer at the harvest.

 

 Bio= Biofertilization. Initial total microbial counts: 13×105 cfu/g dry soil, Initial Azotobacter counts: 5.8×10⁴ cfu/g dry soil.                                                         

 

Concerning the  dehydrogenase enzyme: Data in Table (10) showed the determination of enzymatic activities in rhizosphere of sunflower plants. Dehydrogenase activity (DHA) represents the energy transfer, therefore, it is considered as an index of overall microbial activity in the soil. Ref Represented data recorded that diatoms foliar application recorded lower values for DHA activity compared with biofertilization treatments. Interaction treatment of biofertilization with diatoms recorded the highest DHA activity. This may be due to that A.chroococcum played an important role as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria via N₂ fixation and P-solubilization (Aasfar, et al., 2021). This might led to accumulate available nutrients and stimulate the microorganisms in rhizosphere soil.

 

Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022                                                      72

CONCLUSION

 

The above-mentioned findings suggest that biofertilization with Azotobacters and diatoms has a significant enhancing effect on sunflower plant growth and oil yield. On the other hand, mixed biofertilization in combination with diatom spraying may be recommended for increasing sunflower productivity. By fixing nitrogen, solubilizing phosphate, and generating exopolysaccharides, siderophore, and phytohormone, Azotobacters can help plants grow and develop under salt stress.

REFERENCES:

Aasfar, A. ; A. Bargaz ; K. Yaakoubi ; A. Hilali ; I. Bennis ; Y. Zeroual and I. M. Kadmiri (2021). Nitrogen fixing Azotobacter species as potential soil biological enhancers for crop nutrition and yield stability. Frontiers in microbiology, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.628379 ‏

Abdalla, M.M. (2011 a). Beneficial effects of diatomite on the growth, the biochemical contents and polymorphic DNA in Lupinus albus plants grown under water stress. Agric. and Biol. J. North America, 2(2): 207-220.‏

Abdalla, M.M. (2011 b). Impact of diatomite nutrition on two Trifolium alexandrinum cultivars differing in salinity tolerance. Int. J. Plant Physiol. and Biochem., 3(13), 233-246.

Abdel Razik, E.S. ; B.M. Alharbi ; T.B. Pirzadah ; G.S. Alnusairi ; M.H. Soliman and K.R. Hakeem (2021). γ‐Aminobutyric acid (GABA) mitigates drought and heat stress in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by regulating its physiological, biochemical and molecular pathways. Physiologia Plantarum.172(2): 505-527.

Abdel-Malek, Y. and Y.Z. Ishac (1968). Evaluation of methods used in counting Azotobacter. J. Appl. Bacteriol., 31: 267-275.

Ahmed, M. ; H.M. Noaman and H. Zahran (2022). Combining ability estimation for yield and its components of sunflower inbred lines. Egyptian J. Chem., 65(3): 19-28.

Ait, K.A.N.;  B. Galaup ; J. Desplanques ; G. Dechamp-Guillaume and C. Seassau (2022). Ecosystem Services Provided by Cover Crops and Biofumigation in Sunflower Cultivation. Agronomy.12(1): 120.

Analytical software (2008). Statistix Version 9, Analytical Software, Tallahassee, Florida.

Anonymous (1987). Standard Methods for the Analysis of Oils, Fats and Derivatives International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), (7th revised and enlarged (ed.): Paquot, C., Hautfenne, A., Eds., Blackwell Scientific Publications, London.

 

73                                                      Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022

Bates,  L.S. ;  R.P. Waldran and I.D. Teare (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil., 39: 205-208.

 

Bremner, J.M. and C.S. Mulvaney  (1982). Total nitrogen. In A.L. Page (ed.). Methods of soil analysis, 2nd edn. Agronomy. Amer. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wisconsin. 9(2):595-624.

Brenner, J.D. ; N.R. Krieg and J.T. Staley (2005). Bergey,s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. (Second edition), Vol. 2, The proteobacteria.(part A), Introductory Essays. Springer. Bergey,s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology.

British pharmacopoeia (1963). Determination of volatile oils in Drugs.The pharmaceutical press.London.pp.101-112.

Casida, L.E. ; D.A. Klein and T. Santoro (1964). Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci., 98: 371-378.

Christian, M.M. ; H. Shimelis ; M.D. Laing ; T.J. Tsilo and I. Mathew (2022). Breeding for silicon-use efficiency, protein content and drought tolerance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): a review. Acta Agric. Scandinavica, Section B—Soil & Plant Sci., 72(1): 17-29.

Consentino, B.B. ; S. Aprile ; Y. Rouphael ;  G. Ntatsi ; C. De Pasquale ; G. Iapichino and L.Sabatino (2022). Application of PGPB Combined with Variable N Doses Affects Growth, Yield-Related Traits, N-Fertilizer Efficiency and Nutritional Status of Lettuce Grown under Controlled Condition. Agronomy. 12(2): 236.‏

Cozzolino, V. ; H. Monda ; D. Savy ; V. Di Meo ; G. Vinci and K. Smalla (2021). Cooperation among phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, humic acids and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi induces soil microbiome shifts and enhances plant nutrient uptake. Chem. and Biol. Technol. Agric., 8(1): 1-18.‏

Ehmann, A. (1977). The Van Urk-Salkowski reagent-a sensitive and specific
chromogenic reagent for silica gel thin-layer chromatographic
detection and identification of indole derivatives. J.
Chromatography. 132: 267-276.

Emam, S.M. and E.A. Osman (2021). Integrated application of organic, bio and mineral fertilizers on nutrients uptake and productivity of Zea mays L. under semi-arid condition. J. Plant Nutrition. 44(3): 309-321.‏

Farouk, S. and A.A. Al-Huqail (2022). Sustainable Biochar and/or Melatonin Improve Salinity Tolerance in Borage Plants by Modulating Osmotic Adjustment, Antioxidants, and Ion Homeostasis. Plants, 11(6): 765.‏

Fasusi, O.A. ; C. Cruz and O.O. Babalola (2021). Agricultural sustainability: microbial biofertilizers in rhizosphere management. Agriculture, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020163

 

Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022                                                      74

Gamalero, E. and B.R. Glick (2022). Recent Advances in Bacterial Amelioration of Plant Drought and Salt Stress. Biology. 11(3), 437.‏

 

Garg, N. ; P. Bhandari ; L. Kashyap and  S. Singh (2020). Silicon nutrition and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi: promising strategies for abiotic stress management in crop plants. Metalloids in Plants: Advances and Future Prospects, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119487210.ch16

Ghosh, U.K. ; M.N. Islam ; M.N. Siddiqui and X. Cao and  M.A.R. Khan (2022). Proline, a multifaceted signalling molecule in plant responses to abiotic stress: understanding the physiological mechanisms. Plant Biol., 24(2): 227-239.‏

Gogoi, R. ; S. Baruah and  J. Saikia (2021). Azospirillum: A Salient Source for Sustainable Agriculture. Biofertilizers: Study and Impact, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119724995.ch10

Gokavi, N. ; M. Jayakumar ; K. Mote and  U. Surendran (2021). Diatomaceous earth as a source of silicon and its impact on soil physical and chemical properties, yield and quality, pests and disease incidence of Arabica Coffee cv. Chandragiri. Silicon. 13(12): 4583-4600.

Graham, H.D. and J.H.M. Henderson (1960). Reaction of gibberellic acid
and gibberellins with Folin-Wu phosphomolybdic acid reagent and
its use for quantitative assay. Plant Physiology, 36 (4):405.

Hafez, E.M. ; H.S. Osman; U.A.A. El-Razek; M. Elbagory ; A.E.D. Omara; M.A. Eid and S.M. Gowayed (2021). Foliar-applied potassium silicate coupled with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria improves growth, physiology, nutrient uptake and productivity of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) irrigated with saline water in salt-affected soil. Plants. 10(5): 894.‏

Haghighi, T.M. and  M.J. Saharkhiz (2022). Mycorrhizal colonization and silicon nutrition mitigates drought stress in Licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra L.) with morphophysiological and biochemical perspectives. Industrial Crops and Products. 178, 114650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114650 ‏

Hailu, B. and  H. Mehari (2021). Impacts of Soil Salinity/Sodicity on Soil-Water Relations and Plant Growth in Dry Land Areas: A Review. J. Natural Sci. Res., 12(3): 1-10. 

Hanm, X. ; Y. Kang ; S. Wan and  X. Li (2022). Effect of salinity on oleic sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under drip irrigation in arid area of Northwest China. Agric. Water Management. 259: 107267.

Hardy, R.W.F. ; R.C.  Burns and R.O. Holsten (1973). Application of
the acetylene ethylene assay for measurement of nitrogen fixation.
Soil Biol. and Biochem., 5(1): 47-81.‏

Hassan, S.M. ;  M. Ashour ; N. Sakai ; L. Zhang ; H.A. Hassanien ; A. Gaber  and G. Ammar (2021). Impact of seaweed liquid extract biostimulant on growth, yield, and chemical composition of cucumber (Cucumis sativus). Agric.,11(4): 320.‏

 

75                                                      Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022

Hernández-Canseco, J. ; A. Bautista-Cruz ; S. Sánchez-Mendoza; T. Aquino-Bolaños;  P.S. Sánchez-Medina (2022). Plant Growth-Promoting Halobacteria and Their Ability to Protect Crops from Abiotic Stress: An Eco-Friendly Alternative for Saline Soils. Agronomy 12(4), 804.‏

 

Holt, J.G. ; N.R. Krieg ; P.H.A. Sneath ; J.T. Staley and S.T. Williams (1994). Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 9th ed. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland.

Hua, T. ; R. Zhang ; H. Sun and  C. Liu (2021). Alleviation of boron toxicity in plants: Mechanisms and approaches. Critical Reviews in Envi. Sci. and Technol., 51(24): 2975-3015.

Ilangumaran, G. and D.L. Smith (2017). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in amelioration of salinity stress: A systems biology perspective. Front. Plant Sci.,  8: 1768.

Islam, M.N. ; R.W. Bell ; E.G. Barrett-Lennard  and M. Maniruzzaman (2022). Shallow surface and subsurface drains alleviate waterlogging and salinity in a clay-textured soil and improve the yield of sunflower in the Ganges Delta. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 42(2): 1-17.

Jabin, F. (2016). Loneliness & depression among old aged people. Intl. J. Ind. Psychol., 3(4), 137-46.

Kang, S.M. ; R. Shahzad ; S. Bilal ; A.L. Khan ; Y.G. Park ; K.E. Lee and .J. Lee I (2019). Indole-3-acetic-acid and ACC deaminase producing Leclercia adecarboxylata M01 improves Solanum lycopersicum L. growth and salinity stress tolerance by endogenous secondary metabolites regulation. BMC Microbiol., 19(1): 1-14.‏

Kour, D. ; K.L. Rana ; A.N. Yadav ; N. Yadav ; M. Kumar ; V. Kumar and  A.K. Saxena (2020). Microbial biofertilizers: Bioresources and eco-friendly technologies for agricultural and environmental sustainability. Biocatalysis and Agric. Biotechnol.   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101487‏ ‏

Kumar, V. and N. Narula (1999). Solubilization of inorganic phosphates
and growth emergence of wheat as affected by Azotobacter
chroococcum mutants. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 28(3): 301-305.‏

Kumar, P. and  S.KBrar (2021). Conjugation of biofertilizers with different sources of chemical fertilizers in wheat: A review. Agric. Rev.,42(1): 22-31.‏

Kumar, S. ; S.S. Sindhu and  R. Kumar (2021). Biofertilizers: An ecofriendly technology for nutrient recycling and environmental sustainability. CurrentRes. in Microbial Sci., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100094

 

Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022                                                      76

Kurmanbayeva, A. ; A. Bekturova ; A. Soltabayeva ; D. Oshanova ; Z. Nurbekova ; S. Srivastava and M. Sagi (2022). Active O-acetylserine-(thiol) lyase A and B confer improved selenium resistance and degrade l-Cys and l-SeCys in Arabidopsis. J. Experimental Botany, 73(8): 2525-2539.‏

 

Mahanty, T. ; S. Bhattacharjee ; M. Goswami ; P. Bhattacharyya ; B. Das ; A. Ghosh and  P. Tribedi (2017). Biofertilizers: a potential approach for sustainable agriculture development. Envi. Sci. and Poll. Res., 24(4): 3315-3335.

Mahmoud, O.M.B. ; R. Hidri ; O. Talbi-Zribi ; W. Taamalli ; C. Abdelly and  N. Djébali (2020). Auxin and proline producing rhizobacteria mitigate salt-induced growth inhibition of barley plants by enhancing water and nutrient status. South African J. Botany, 128: 209-217.‏

Malhotra, M. and S. Srivastava (2009). Stress-responsive indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis by Azospirillum brasilense SM and its ability to modulate plant growth. Eur. J. Soil Biol.,  45: 73–80. 

Mashabela, M.D. ; L.A. Piater ; I.A. Dubery ; F. Tugizimana and  M.I. Mhlongo (2022). Rhizosphere tripartite interactions and PGPR-mediated metabolic reprogramming towards ISR and plant priming: A metabolomics review. Biology, 11(3): 346.

Moradzadeh, S. ; S. Moghaddam ; A. Rahimi ; L. Pourakbar and  R.Z. Sayyed, (2021). Combined bio-chemical fertilizers ameliorate agro-biochemical attributes of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.). Scientific Reports, 11(1): 1-16.‏

Mukarram, M. ; S. Choudhary ; D. Kurjak ; A. Petek and M.M.A. Khan (2021). Drought: Sensing, signalling, effects and tolerance in higher plants. Physiologia Plantarum. 172(2): 1291-1300.‏

Naitam, M.G. and R. Kaushik (2021). Archaea: An Agro-Ecological Perspective. Current Microbiol., 78(7): 2510-2521.

Nautiyal, C.S. (1999). An efficient microbiological growth medium for screening phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Letters, 170: 265- 270.

Neilands, J.B. (1981). In: Development of iron chelator for clinical use
Martell AE, Anderson WJ, Badman DG (eds.), Elsevier: Microbial
iron transport compounds (siderophores) as chelating agents: North
Holland: Amsterdam Field experements

Nosheen, S. ; I. Ajmal and  Y. Song (2021). Microbes as biofertilizers, a potential approach for sustainable crop production. Sustainability, 13(4): 1868.‏ ‏

Numan, M. ; S. Bashir ; Y. Khan ; R. Mumtaz ; Z.K. Shinwari ; A.L. Khan and A. Al-Harrasi (2018). Plant growth promoting bacteria as an alternative strategy for salt tolerance in plants: A review. Microbiol. Res.,  209: 21–32.

 

77                                                      Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022

Nunes da Silva, M. ; J. Machado ; J. Osorio ; R. Duarte and  C.S. Santos (2022). Non-Essential Elements and Their Role in Sustainable Agriculture. Agronomy, 12(4): 888.‏

 

Omer, A. and  A. Abd-Elnaby (2017). Effect of phosphate dissolving Bacteria on physiological behavior of some sesame cultivars under saline conditions at Sahle Eltina-North Sinai. Alexandria Sci. Exchange J., 38: 687-698.‏

Orozco-Mosqueda, M.C. ; B.R. Glick and G. Santoyo (2020). ACC deaminase in plant-growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB): An efficient mechanism to counter salt stress in crops. Microbiol. Res., 235: 126439.

Page, A.L. ; R.H. Miller and D.R. Keeney (1982). Methods of Soil
Analysis, Part 2. American Society of Agronomy. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA. 4(2): 167-179.‏

Prieto, P. ; M. Pineda and M. Aguilar (1999). Spectrophotometric quantitation of antioxidant capacity through the formation of a phosphomolybdenum complex: specific application to the determination of vitamin E. Analytical Biochem., 269(2): 337-341.‏

Quigley, K.M. ; D.M. Griffith ; G.L. Donati and  T.M. Anderson (2020). Soil nutrients and precipitation are major drivers of global patterns of grass leaf silicification. Ecology. 101(6): e03006.‏

Rawat, N. ; S.L. Singla‐Pareek and  A. Pareek (2021). Membrane dynamics during individual and combined abiotic stresses in plants and tools to study the same. Physiologia Plantarum. 171(4): 653-676.‏

Safwat, A.A. ; A.Ibrahim  ; M.S Gouda ;
W.W. Mohamed and  S. Khattab (2016). Diatomite alleviates the adverse effects of salinity stress on growth and yield of Stevia rebaudiana. Int. J. Adv. Biotechnol. and Res., 7(1): 10-21.‏ ‏

Schmidt, J.E. ; A. DuVal ; M.E. Isaac and  P. Hohmann (2022). At the roots of chocolate: understanding and optimizing the cacao root-associated microbiome for ecosystem services. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 42(2): 1-19.

Sehrawat, A. ; S.S. Sindhu and  B.R. Glick (2022). Hydrogen cyanide production by soil bacteria: Biological control of pests and promotion of plant growth in sustainable agriculture. Pedosphere. 32(1): 15-38.

Semida, W.M. ; A. Abdelkhalik ; G. Mohamed ; A. El-Mageed ; A. Taia ; A. El-Mageed and E.F. Ali (2021). Foliar application of zinc oxide nanoparticles promotes drought stress tolerance in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Plants, 10(2): 421.‏

 

Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022                                                      78

Shahid, M. and  M.S. Khan (2022). Tolerance of pesticides and antibiotics among beneficial soil microbes recovered from contaminated rhizosphere of edible crops. Current Res. in Microbial Sci., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100091

 

Shahrajabian, M.H. ; C. Chaski ; N.  Polyzos and S.A. Petropoulos (2021). Biostimulants application: A low input cropping management tool for sustainable farming of vegetables. Biomolecules. 11(5): 698.‏

Shahzad, M. ; A. Qadir and  S. Masood (2017). Silicon and alleviation of salt stress in crop genotypes differing in salt tolerance. In Silicon in Plants: Advances and Future Prospects (pp. 133-148). Boca Raton: CRC.‏

Shirling, E.B. and D.Gottlieb (1966). Methods for characterisation of Streptomyces species. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 16: 3 1 3- 340

Singh, P. ; R.K. Singh ; Y. Zhou ; J. Wang ; Y. Jiang ; N. Shen and M. Jiang (2022). Unlocking the strength of plant growth promoting Pseudomonas in improving crop productivity in normal and challenging environments: A review. J. Plant Int.,. 17(1): 220-238.‏

Soleymanifard, A. ; M. Mojaddam ; S. Lack and  M. Alavifazel (2022). Effect of Azotobacter Chroococcum and Nitrogen Fertilization on Some Morphophysiological Traits, Grain Yield, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Safflower Genotypes in Rainfed Conditions. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2022.2028815

Sumbul, A. ; R.A. Ansari ; R. Rizvi and I. Mahmood (2020). Azotobacter: A potential bio-fertilizer for soil and plant health management. Saudi J. Biol. Sci., 27(12): 3634-3640.

Tabatabai, M.A. and J. MBremner (1969). Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol. and Biochemistry. 1(4): 301-307.‏

Ure, A.M. (1995). Methods of analysis for heavy metals in soils. In: Heavy metals in soils, Alloway, B. J., Blacke Academic and Professional, an imprint of Chapman & Hall, Wester cleddens Road, Bishopbriggs, Glasgow G64 2NZ,UK.,pp. 58-102.

Vos, P. ; G. Garrity ; D. Jones and N. Krieg (2009). Bergey^,s Manual of Systematic  Bacteriology. 2^nd , Vol. 3, William& Wilkins, Baltimore.

Zulfiqar, H. ; M. Shahbaz ; M. Ahsan ; M. Nafees ; H. Nadeem ; M. Akram  and S. Fahad (2021). Strigolactone (GR24) induced salinity tolerance in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by ameliorating morpho-physiological and biochemical attributes under in vitro conditions. J. Plant Growth Regulation. 40(5): 2079-2091.

 

 

 

79                                                      Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37 (3-4) 2022

استجابة نبات عباد الشمس للتسميد الحيوي والدياتومات تحت ظروف الملوحه

 

سماح محمد عبدالعزيز يوسف

قسم خصوبة و ميکروبيولوجيا الاراضي -مرکز بحوث الصحراء–-المطرية- القاهرة – مصر

کان الغرض من الدراسة هو تحديد وعزل سلالة Azotobacter chroococcum التي تتحمل الملوحة والتي يمکن استخدامها کسماد حيوي. تم أخذ عينات تربة من المواقع المتأثرة بالملوحة في شمال سيناء ورأس سدر وسهل الطينة ، تم اختبار افضل اثنين لسلالاتي ال Azotobacter من حيث تحمل ظروف الملوحه عند 3٪ کلوريد الصوديوم في تثبيت النيتروجين ، وإذابة الفوسفات ، وانتاج الإندول ، والجبريلين ، ومخلبيات الحديد. صممت تجربة حقلية في سهل الطينة بشمال سيناء لدراسة تأثير التسميد الحيوي ورذاذ الدياتومات الورقي على تطوير وإنتاج صنف دوار الشمس سخا 53. زاد محصول عباد الشمس ومحتوى الزيت والمحتوى الکيميائي بشکل ملحوظ عند استخدام  الأسمدة الحيوية مع الدياتومات باستخدام نص الجرعه من السماد المعدني النيتروجيني . أيضا ، کان للتفاعل بين رش الدياتوم الورقي ومعاملات التسميد الحيوي تأثير معنوي على جميع مکونات المحصول. بالإضافة إلى ذلک ، وقد وجد ان هناک زيادة ملحوظه في کل مکونات المحصول والمحتوي الکميائي للحبوب عند التلقيح بخليط البکتريا مع الدياتومات مقارنة بالکنترول وقد اظهرت التحاليل الميکروبيولوجيه ان هناک زياده في الاعداد الکليه للبکتريا وعدد الآزوتوباکتر في تربة الريزوسفير و انبعاث ثاني اوکسيد الکربون في منطقه الريزوسفير ، کما أظهر النشاط الإنزيمي (ديهيدروجينيز) استجابة جيدة في جميع المعاملات مقارنة بالکنترول. وهکذا فقد اوضحت النتائج ان التلقيح ببکتريا Azotobacter chroococcum مع الدياتومات يمکن ان يکون بديل واعد واقتصادي لمقاومة النبات للملوحة.

 

Article View: 586

PDF Download: 217