Abd-Elsamee, M., Edrees, M., Mowafey, I. (2022). Platelet-Rich Fibrin Combined with Perforated Versus Non-Perforated Collagen Membrane in Treatment of Class II Gingival Recession (A Comparative Clinical Study). test, 5(2), 253-260. doi: 10.21608/aadj.2022.267323
Mahmoud Mohamed Abd-Elsamee; Mohamed Fouad Edrees; Ibraheem Mahmoud Mowafey. "Platelet-Rich Fibrin Combined with Perforated Versus Non-Perforated Collagen Membrane in Treatment of Class II Gingival Recession (A Comparative Clinical Study)". test, 5, 2, 2022, 253-260. doi: 10.21608/aadj.2022.267323
Abd-Elsamee, M., Edrees, M., Mowafey, I. (2022). 'Platelet-Rich Fibrin Combined with Perforated Versus Non-Perforated Collagen Membrane in Treatment of Class II Gingival Recession (A Comparative Clinical Study)', test, 5(2), pp. 253-260. doi: 10.21608/aadj.2022.267323
Abd-Elsamee, M., Edrees, M., Mowafey, I. Platelet-Rich Fibrin Combined with Perforated Versus Non-Perforated Collagen Membrane in Treatment of Class II Gingival Recession (A Comparative Clinical Study). test, 2022; 5(2): 253-260. doi: 10.21608/aadj.2022.267323

Platelet-Rich Fibrin Combined with Perforated Versus Non-Perforated Collagen Membrane in Treatment of Class II Gingival Recession (A Comparative Clinical Study)

Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal
Article 13, Volume 5, Issue 2, October 2022, Pages 253-260    PDF (1.53 M)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/aadj.2022.267323
Authors
Mahmoud Mohamed Abd-Elsamee1; Mohamed Fouad Edrees* 2; Ibraheem Mahmoud Mowafey3
1Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Dental Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, E
2Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Dental Radiology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, (Assuit, boys), Al-Azhar University, Egypt.
3Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Dental Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt.
Abstract
Aim: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of platelet rich fibrin (PRF) in combination with perforated versus non-perforated collagen membrane in treatment of class II gingival recession.Subjects and Methods: fourteen patients having at least one tooth with Miller’s Class II buccal/labial gingival recession defect after phase I therapy were classified into two groups, group 1 was treated with coronally advanced flap (CAF) combined with PRF membrane along with perforated collagen membrane and group 2 was treated with CAF combined with PRF membrane along with non-perforated collagen membrane. Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.Results: Both treatment groups showed significant root coverage, probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction, clinical attachment (CAL) gain and increase in width of keratinized gingiva (WKG) 6 months after surgery compared with baseline. However, there was a highly significant increase in WKG and CAL gain when collagen membrane was perforated.Conclusion: The perforated collagen membrane demonstrated clinical advantages beyond that achieved by the non-perforated one.
Keywords
Platelet-Rich Fibrin; Perforated; Non-Perforated Collagen Membrane; Class II Gingival Recession; Gingivitis
Statistics
Article View: 125
PDF Download: 148