Utilizing the Social Constructivist Approach via Online Learning Environments to Enhance English Majors' Critical Writing Skills

Abdelwahab, A. F. (2020a). The effect of using dialogic teaching on developing English majors' critical thinking skills and metacognitive awareness, Journal of Education College- Ain-Shams University, 44 (4), 89-126.

Abdelwahab, A. F. (2020b). The effect of using the process-genre approach on developing reflective writing skills and genre awareness of EFL Faculty of Specific Education sophomore students, Journal of Education College-Sohag University, 73 (73), 1-37.

Ali, H. A. (2021). The impact of a program based on collaborativist learning theory on developing EFL critical writing skills and interaction among languages and translation students. CDELT Occasional Papers in the Development of English Education, 75(1), 215-252.

Bennett, L. Y. (2018). An exploration of Japanese students’ concept and application of critical thinking in academic writing. In R. Ruegg, & C. Williams (Eds.), Teaching English for Academic Purposes (EAP) in Japan (pp. 123-139). Springer, Singapore.

Campión, R. S., Nalda, F. N., & Rivilla, A. M. (2012). Web 2.0 and higher education: Its educational use in the university environment. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, (2), 112-118.

Charmaz, K. (2017). The power of constructivist grounded theory for critical inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1), 34-45.

Cho, K. W. (2022). Predicting beliefs in psychological misconceptions with psychology knowledge and the critical reflection test: A replication and extension. Teaching of Psychology, 49(4), 303-309.

Conyers, D. (2010). Critical writing: A guide for IDS students. Brighton: University of Sussex

Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2019). Mediating EFL learners’ academic writing skills in online dynamic assessment using Google Docs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5-6), 527-555.

Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2011). A social constructivist approach to foreign language writing in online environments. AAUSC 2010: Critical and Intercultural Theory and Language Pedagogy, 181.

Gómez-Estern, B. M., Amián, J. G., Sánchez Medina, J. A., & Marco Macarro, M. J. (2010). Literacy and the formation of cultural identity. Theory & Psychology, 20(2), 231-250.

Jonassen, D. (2003). Using cognitive tools to represent problems. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 362-381.

Jonassen, D. (2006). Modeling with technology: Mind tools for conceptual change. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Lee, S. (2017). Writer identity in narrative and argumentative genres: A case of Korean students in the United States. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(1), 178-188.

Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (2009). Social construction of reality. Encyclopedia of Communication Theory, 892-895.

Liu, S. H. J., & Lan, Y. J. (2016). Social constructivist approach to web-based EFL learning: Collaboration, motivation, and perception on the use of Google Docs. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 171-186.

Lötter, M. J., & Jacobs, L. (2020). Using smartphones as a social constructivist pedagogical tool for inquiry-supported problem-solving: An exploratory study. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 20(4), 347-363.

Matruglio, E. (2016). Objectivity and critique: The creation of historical perspectives in senior secondary writing. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 39(2), 124-134.

McKinley, J. (2013). Displaying critical thinking in EFL academic writing: A discussion of Japanese to English contrastive rhetoric. RELC Journal, 44(2), 195–208.

McKinley, J. (2015). Critical argument and writer identity: Social constructivism as a theoretical framework for EFL academic writing. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 12(3), 184-207.

Mohammed, M. F. (2020). Scaffolding with online tasks for developing critical writing skills of 2nd year secondary school students. Journal of Education, 76, 76.

Mohammed, S. H., & Kinyó, L. (2022). The cross-cultural validation of the technology-enhanced social constructivist learning environment questionnaire in the Iraqi Kurdistan Region. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1), 1-25.

Nobles, S., & Paganucci, L. (2015). Do digital writing tools deliver? Student perceptions of writing quality using digital tools and online writing environments. Computers and Composition, 38, 16-31.

Nykopp, M., Marttunen, M., & Erkens, G. (2019). Coordinating collaborative writing in an online environment. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(3), 536-556.

Olson, J. S., Wang, D., Olson, G. M., & Zhang, J. (2017). How people write together now: Beginning the investigation with advanced undergraduates in a project course. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 24(1), 1-40.

Safari, P., & Pourhashemi, M. R. (2017). A case study of an Iranian EFL student teacher’s professional preparation and development from the perspective of social constructivist approach. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(2), 227-252.

Sangeetha, S. (2016). Edmodo and Padlet as a collaborative online tool in enriching writing skills in language learning and teaching. Global English-Oriented Research Journal, 1(4), 178-184.

Shepherd, G. (2022). Leveraging digital and cloud-based tools for contextualized assessment of critical writing: Best practices and design principles for learning in remote settings. In J. Keengwe (Ed.), Handbook of research on digital-based assessment and innovative practices in education (pp. 44-60). IGI Global.

Storch, N. (2011). Collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Processes, outcomes, and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 275-288.

Teng, Y., & Wang, X. (2021). The effect of two educational technology tools on student engagement in Chinese EFL courses. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-15.

Woodhouse, J., & Wood, P. (2022). Creating dialogic spaces: Developing doctoral students’ critical writing skills through peer assessment and review. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 643-655.