A Systematic Design Technique of Biomimicry to Correlate and Integrate Architecture and Biology to Attain Green Buildings | ||
| JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences | ||
| Article 5, Volume 51, Issue 4, July and August 2023, Pages 239-259 PDF (798.54 K) | ||
| Document Type: Technical paper | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/jesaun.2023.181479.1190 | ||
| Author | ||
| Abdullah Badawy Mohammed* | ||
| Architectural Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Fayoum University, Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Nature embraces enormous resources for biomimicry yet faces many challenges, including embodying and simulating environmental systems and processes into technical systems within the built environment. Also, imitation and mimicry strategies focus on separate parts rather than a complete system as an organism as a single unit in its environment. Therefore, the research aims to reduce the harmful effects of buildings and preserve biodiversity and energy through a systematic design technique for biomimicry to identify appropriate adaptation mechanisms from nature and inspire their functions, processes, and forms to integrate architecture and biology. Accordingly, the study addressed biomimicry through its entrances, classes, and levels depending on the desired result. The problems encountering biomimicry application and its adaptation mechanisms; were explained. Then, the information and characteristics required from nature were classified according to three biomimicry classes to implement environmental concepts and treatments. Likewise, the study compared the biomimicry strategies to choose the most suitable one for the design processes. Thus, it confirmed the correlation between green buildings and biomimicry. Finally, a systematic technique was derived and established to incorporate and collaborate between two approaches for simulating nature to identify the appropriate biological systems for attaining green building, improving design processes, and making decisions. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Biomimicry; Mimicry; Design; Adaptation; Green Buildings (GBs) | ||
| References | ||
|
[1] O. A. Oguntona and C. O. Aigbavboa, “Promoting biomimetic materials for a sustainable construction industry,” Bioinspired, Biomim. Nanobiomaterials, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 122–130, 2017, doi: 10.1680/jbibn.16.00014.
[2] S. Mirniazmandan and E. Rahimianzarif, “Biomimicry, An Approach Toward Sustainability of High-Rise Buildings,” Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A Sci., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1837–1846, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s40995-017-0397-4.
[3] R. Esat and S. Ahmed-Kristensen, “Classification of bio-design applications: Towards a design methodology,” Proc. Int. Des. Conf. Des., vol. 3, pp. 1031–1042, 2018, doi: 10.21278/idc.2018.0531.
[4] C. Tavsan, F. Tavsan, and E. Sonmez, “Biomimicry in Architectural Design Education,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 182, pp. 489–496, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.832.
[5] G. A. N. Radwan and N. Osama, “Biomimicry, an Approach, for Energy Effecient Building Skin Design,” Procedia Environ. Sci., vol. 34, pp. 178–189, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.04.017.
[6] L. Ilieva, I. Ursano, L. Traista, B. Hoffmann, and H. Dahy, “Biomimicry as a Sustainable Design Methodology— Introducing the ‘Biomimicry for Sustainability’ Framework,” Biomimetics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–13, 2022, doi: 10.3390/biomimetics7020037.
[7] L. Badarnah, “Form follows environment: Biomimetic approaches to building envelope design for environmental adaptation,” Buildings, vol. 7, no. 2, 2017, doi: 10.3390/buildings7020040.
[8] Y. Uchiyama, E. Blanco, and R. Kohsaka, “Application of biomimetics to architectural and urban design: A review across scales,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 23. pp. 1–15, 2020. doi: 10.3390/su12239813.
[9] S. P. Dash, “Application of biomimicry in building design,” Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 644–660, 2018.
[10] M. Robertson, Sustainability principles and practice, 3rd Editio. London: Routledge, 2021. doi: 10.4324/9780203768747.
[11] E. Cuce, Z. Nachan, P. M. Cuce, F. Sher, and G. B. Neighbour, “Strategies for ideal indoor environments towards low/zero carbon buildings through a biomimetic approach,” Int. J. Ambient Energy, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 86–95, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1080/01430750.2017.1372807.
[12] L. Badarnah and U. Kadri, “A methodology for the generation of biomimetic design concepts,” Archit. Sci. Rev., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 120–133, 2015, doi: 10.1080/00038628.2014.922458.
[13] M. S. Aziz and A. Y. El Sherif, “Biomimicry as an approach for bio-inspired structure with the aid of computation,” Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 707–714, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2015.10.015.
[14] O. A. Oguntona and C. O. Aigbavboa, “Biomimetic reinvention of the construction industry: Energy management and sustainability,” Energy Procedia, vol. 142, pp. 2721–2727, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.216.
[15] D. I. Attia, “Biomimicry In Eco – Sustainable Interior Design : Natural Ventilation Approach,” Int. Des. J., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 291–303, 2015.
[16] M. P. Zari, “Ecosystem services analysis for the design of regenerative built environments,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 54–64, 2012, doi: 10.1080/09613218.2011.628547.
[17] S. M. Hosseini, M. Mohammadi, T. Schröder, and O. Guerra-Santin, “Bio-inspired interactive kinetic façade: Using dynamic transitory-sensitive area to improve multiple occupants’ visual comfort,” Front. Archit. Res., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 821–837, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.004.
[18] W. Myers, Bio design: Nature, science, creativity. Museum of Modern Art, 2018.
[19] K. M. Al-Obaidi, M. Azzam Ismail, H. Hussein, and A. M. Abdul Rahman, “Biomimetic building skins: An adaptive approach,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 79, no. April, pp. 1472–1491, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.028.
[20] R. M. A. El-Zeiny, “Biomimicry as a Problem Solving Methodology in Interior Architecture,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 50, no. July, pp. 502–512, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.054.
[21] H. J. Moghaddami, “Re-thinking biophilic design patterns in preschool environments for children,” Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University,Ankara, Turkey, Ankara, Turkey, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://open.metu.edu.tr/bitstream/handle/11511/45239/index.pdf
[22] M. Mohammed, M. Shahda, A. Abd, E. Elmokadem, M. Mohammed, and A. Elhafeez, “Biomimicry Levels as an Approach to The Architectural Sustainability,” Port-Said Eng. Res. J., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 117–125, 2014, doi: 10.21608/pserj.2014.45298.
[23] O. A. Oguntona and C. O. Aigbavboa, “Biomimicry principles as evaluation criteria of sustainability in the construction industry,” Energy Procedia, vol. 142, pp. 2491–2497, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.188.
[24] A. Gamage and R. Hyde, “Can Biomimicry, as an approach, enhance Ecologically Sustainable Design (ESD)?,” 45th Annu. Conf. Archit. Sci. Assoc., 2011.
[25] H. Elshimy and N. Samir, “Green Building between Tradition and Modernity Study Comparative Analysis between Conventional Methods and Updated Styles of Design and Architecture Processors,” Renew. Energy Sustain. Dev., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 155–163, 2017, doi: 10.21622/resd.2017.03.1.155.
[26] O. A. Oguntona and C. O. Aigbavboa, “Barriers Militating Against the Adoption of Biomimicry as a Sustainable Construction Practice,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 266, p. 03010, 2019, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201926603010.
[27] J. F. Acuña-Piedra and A. Quesada-Román, “Multidecadal biogeomorphic dynamics of a deltaic mangrove forest in Costa Rica,” Ocean Coast. Manag., vol. 211, no. May, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105770.
[28] S. M. Hosseini, F. Fadli, and M. Mohammadi, “Biomimetic kinetic shading facade inspired by tree morphology for improving occupant’s daylight performance,” J. Daylighting, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 65–82, 2021, doi: 10.15627/jd.2021.5.
[29] O. A. Oguntona and C. O. Aigbavboa, “Benefits of biomimicry adoption and implementation in the construction industry,” in International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2018, pp. 506–514.
[30] A. Gamage and R. Hyde, “A model based on Biomimicry to enhance ecologically sustainable design,” Archit. Sci. Rev., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 224–235, 2012, doi: 10.1080/00038628.2012.709406.
[31] R. Yu, N. Gu, and M. Ostwald, “Evaluating creativity in parametric design environments and geometric modelling environments,” Archit. Sci. Rev., vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 443–453, 2018, doi: 10.1080/00038628.2018.1512043. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 513 PDF Download: 705 |
||
