الحماية القانونية من مخاطر أدوات الذكاء الاصطناعي المستخدمة في تصفية المحتويات المرئية عبر شبكة الانترنت | Legal Protection Against Risks of Artificial Intelligence Tools Used in Filtering Visual Content on the Internet

قائمة المراجع:

أولا: المراجع العربية:

-     د. محي الدين سليم –نطاق الضرر المرتد –بدون دار نشر – القاهرة – 2009م.

ثانياً: المراجع الأجنبية:

1-     Ergon, M. (2019). What is artificial intelligence? Technical considerations and future perception. Anatolian J. Cardiol, 22(2), 5-7.

2-      McCarthy, J. (2007). What is artificial intelligence?

3-      Drigas, A. S., Argyri, K., & Vrettaros, J. (2009). Decade review (1999-2009): artificial intelligence techniques in student modeling. In Best Practices for the Knowledge Society. Knowledge, Learning, Development and Technology for All: Second World Summit on the Knowledge Society, WSKS 2009, Chania, Crete, Greece, September 16-18, 2009. Proceedings 2 (pp. 552-564). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.‏

4-        Kapur, P. K., Kumar, S., & Garg, R. B. (1999). Contributions to hardware and software reliability (Vol. 3). World Scientific.

5-      Guy, I., Avraham, U., Carmel, D., Ur, S., Jacovi, M., & Ronen, I. (2013, May). Mining expertise and interests from social media. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 515-526).‏

6-      California Legislative Information. (2018). California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Retrieved from https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?

7-      European Commission. (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai

8-       NHTSA. (2016). Federal Automated Vehicles Policy. Retrieved from https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/documents/13069a-ads2.0_090617_v9a_tag.pdf

9-       Kalpokiene, J., & Kalpokas, I. (2023). Creative encounters of a posthuman kind–anthropocentric law, artificial intelligence, and art. Technology in Society, 102197.‏

10-       Tian, Z. (2021, June). Application of Artificial Intelligence System in Libraries through Data Mining and Content Filtering Methods. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1952, No. 4, p. 042091). IOP Publishing.

11-       Karizat, N., Delmonaco, D., Eslami, M., & Andalibi, N. (2021). Algorithmic folk theories and identity: How TikTok users co-produce Knowledge of identity and engage in algorithmic resistance. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1-44.‏

12-        Von Bonin, A., & Malhi, S. (2020). The Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Future of Competition Law Enforcement. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 11(8), 468-471.‏

13-       Culotta, A., Kumar, N., & Cutler, J. (2015, February). Predicting the demographics of twitter users from website traffic data. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (Vol. 29, No. 1).‏

14-      - Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512

15-      - Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512

16-       Singh, N., Zhao, H., & Hu, X. (2005). Analyzing the cultural content of web sites: A cross‐national comparision of China, India, Japan, and US. International Marketing Review, 22(2), 129-146.‏

17-      McCosker, A. (2022). Making sense of deepfakes: Socializing AI and building data literacy on GitHub and YouTube. New Media & Society, 14614448221093943.‏

18-     Winkler, J. D., Kanouse, D. E., & Ware, J. E. (1982). Controlling for acquiescence response set in scale development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(5), 555.‏

19-      Miernicki, M., & Ng, I. (2021). Artificial intelligence and moral rights. AI & SOCIETY, 36, 319-329.‏

20-        Brożek, B., & Janik, B. (2019). Can artificial intelligences be moral agents? New ideas in psychology, 54, 101-106.‏

21-      Hall, H. K. (2018). Deepfake videos: When seeing isn't believing. Cath. UJL & Tech, 27, 51.‏

22-      Asad, M., Halim, Z., Waqas, M., & Tu, S. (2021). An In-ad contents-based viewability prediction framework using Artificial Intelligence for Web Ads. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54(7), 5095-5125.‏

23-         Urban, J. Government communications in 2023 and beyond.‏

24-       Shangaraev, R., & Timakova, O. (2020, December). Arab Spring Revolutions and Digital Technologies: Implications for Russia. In Proceedings of the International Conference Digital Age: Traditions, Modernity, and Innovations (ICDATMI 2020) (pp. 107-110). Atlantis Press.‏

25-       Gerstner, M.E.: Comment, liability issues with artificial intelligence software, 33 Santa Clara L. Rev. 239. http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview/vol33/iss1/7 (1993)

26-       Tuthill, G. S. (1991). Legal liabilities and expert systems. AI Expert, 6(3), 44-51.‏

27-       Elkin-Koren, N. (2020). Contesting algorithms: Restoring the public interest in content filtering by artificial intelligence. Big Data & Society, 7(2), 2053951720932296.‏

28-       Wu, T. (2019). Will artificial intelligence eat the law? The rise of hybrid social-ordering systems. Columbia law review, 119(7), 2001-2028.‏

29-       Neuwirth, R. J. (2023). Prohibited artificial intelligence practices in the proposed EU artificial intelligence act (AIA). Computer Law & Security Review, 48, 105798.‏

30-        Ponkin, I. V., & Redkina, A. I. (2018). Artificial Intelligence from the Point of View of Law. RUDN Journal of Law, 22(1), 91-109. doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2018-22-1-91-109

31-      Hoffmann-Riem, W. (2020). Artificial intelligence as a challenge for law and regulation. Regulating artificial intelligence, 1-29.‏

32-       Hoffmann-Riem, W. (2020). Artificial intelligence as a challenge for law and regulation. Regulating artificial intelligence, 1-29.‏

33-     Faruk, M. J. H., Shahriar, H., Valero, M., Barsha, F. L., Sobhan, S., Khan, M. A., ... & Wu, F. (2021, December). Malware detection and prevention using artificial intelligence techniques. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 5369-5377). IEEE.‏

34-     Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market ('Directive on electronic commerce')

35-      Chesterman, S. (2020). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE LIMITS OF LEGAL PERSONALITY. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 69(4), 819-844. doi:10.1017/S0020589320000366

36-    -  Ziemianin, K. (2021). Civil legal personality of artificial intelligence: Future or utopia? Internet Policy Review, 10(2), 1-22.‏

37-     Arnold, B. B., & Gough, D. (2017). Turing's people: Personhood, artificial intelligence, and popular culture. Canberra Law Review, 15(1), 1-37.‏

38-      - Talimonchik, V. P. (2021). The Prospects for the Recognition of the International Legal Personality of Artificial Intelligence. Laws, 10(4), 85.‏

39-       Kingston, J. K. (2016). Artificial intelligence and legal liability. In Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXXIII: Incorporating Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XXIV 33 (pp. 269-279). Springer International Publishing.‏

40-       Chen, A., Wang, C., & Zhang, X. (2022). Reflection on the equitable attribution of responsibility for artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis and treatment decisions. Intelligent Medicine.‏