The Effectiveness of 4MAT Model via Google Classroom in Developing Argumentative Writing Skills among EFL Majors | ||
| التربية (الأزهر): مجلة علمية محکمة للبحوث التربوية والنفسية والاجتماعية) | ||
| Volume 40, Issue 192, December 2021, Pages 227-259 PDF (1007.83 K) | ||
| Document Type: المقالة الأصلية | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/jsrep.2021.314156 | ||
| Authors | ||
| أيمن شعبان خليفة أحمد; عبد الرحيم سعد الدين الهلالي; عطية عبد القادر عطية الطناني | ||
| قسم المناهج وطرق التدريس، كلية التربية بنين بالقاهرة، جامعة الأزهر. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| تمحور الهدف الرئيس للبحث الحالي حول استقصاء فاعلية نموذج مكارثي 4MAT من خلال بيئة فصول جوجل في تنمية مهارات الكتابة الجدلية لدى طلاب شعبة اللغة الإنجليزية كلغة أجنبية بكلية التربية، جامعة الأزهر، وقد تبني البحث المنهج التجريبي من خلال استخدام تصميم المجموعة الضابطة ذي الاختبارين القبلي والبعدي، وتمثلت أداة البحث في اختبار للكتابة الجدلية ومقياس تقدير متدرج لجمع البيانات؛ حيث تم تطبيقه قبليًا وبعديًا على طلاب عينة البحث بعد التأكد من صدقه وثباته، وتكونت عينة البحث من 74 طالبًا من الفرقة الرابعة بشعبة اللغة الإنجليزية، تم اختيارهم وتوزيعهم عشوائيًا إلى مجموعتين: المجموعة التجريبية وبلغ عدد طلابها 25 طالبًا، والمجموعة الضابطة وبلغ عدد طلابها 24 طالبًا، ولقد أسفر التحليل الإحصائي للبيانات من خلال اختبار للعينات المستقلة عن وجود فروق ذات دلالة إحصائية بين متوسطي درجات مجموعتي البحث لصالح المجموعة التجريبية، مما يؤكد فاعلية نموذج مكارثي من خلال بيئة فصول جوجل في تنمية مهارات الكتابة الجدلية؛ حيث كان حجم الأثر كبير طبقًا لمعادلة كوهين (d = 1.47) ، ولقد قدم البحث مجموعة من التوصيات والمقترحات لباحثي المستقبل. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| نموذج مكارثي; بيئة فصول جوجل; الكتابة الجدلية | ||
| References | ||
|
Abu El-Magd, M. A. M. (2017). Developing English language teaching researchers’ oral argumentative skills through webinar. Faculty of Education Journal, Port-said University, 320-368.
Aktas, I., & Bilgin, I. (2015). The effect of 4MAT learning model on the achievement and motivation of 7th grade students on the subject of particulate nature of matter and an examination of student opinions on the model. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33(1), 1-21.
Al-Saleem, B. I. A. (2019). The 4MAT model in English language teaching. Arab World English Journal, 10(4),112 -120.
Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153-160.
Behizadeh, N., & Engelhard Jr, G. (2011). Historical view of the influences of measurement and writing theories on the practice of writing assessment in the United States. Assessing writing, 16(3), 189-211.
Benchachinda, T. (2012). Developing English writing ability of grade 6 students using the 4MAT system. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(6), 551.
Berge, K. L., Evensen, L. S., & Thygesen, R. (2016). The wheel of writing: a model of the writing domain for the teaching and assessing of writing as a key competency. The Curriculum Journal, 27(2), 172-189.
Bhat, S., Raju, R., Bikramjit, A., & D’Souza, R. (2018). Leveraging E-Learning through Google Classroom: a usability study. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 31(3), 129-135.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin
Chicioreanu, T. D., & Cosma, I. (2017). I am a teacher in the digital era. What to choose: Google Classroom or Moodle?. In The International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education (Vol. 2, p. 310). " Carol I" National Defense University.
Chinn, C. A. (2006). Learning to argue. In O'Donnell, A. M., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Erkens, G. (Eds.). Collaborative learning, reasoning, and technology, (pp.224-239). Routledge.
Cotton, F., & Wilson, K. (2011). An investigation of examiner rating of coherence and cohesion in the IELTS academic writing task 2. In J. Osborne (Ed.), IELTS research reports (Vol. 12, pp. 235e310). Melbourne: IELTS Australia and British Council.
De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 139.
Dean, N. (2018). A look at the write brain. Brain World Magazine. Retrieved from: https://brainworldmagazine.com/look-write-brain/.
Eady, M. J. & Lockyer, L. (2013). Tools for learning: technology and teaching strategies, learning to teach in the primary school. Queensland University of Technology.
Elnaggar, B. E. (2018). Developing a program-based on scientific discourse analysis to enhance engineering students’ scientific argumentative writing skills. Journal of Faculty of Education, Banha University, 29(116), 1-22.
Erhard, K., Kessler, F., Neumann, N., Ortheil, H. J., & Lotze, M. (2014). Professional training in creative writing is associated with enhanced fronto-striatal activity in a literary text continuation task. NeuroImage, 100, 15-23.
Georgiev, T., Georgieva, E., & Smrikarov, A. (2004, June). M-learning-a new stage of Е-learning. In International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies-CompSysTech,4(28), 1-4.
Hasani, A. (2016). Enhancing argumentative writing skill through contextual teaching and learning. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(16), 1573-1578.
Hassan, S. R. (2018). EFL develop to model learning flipped the using school secondary STEM of skills writing argumentative students. Faculty of Education Journal, Tanta University. 74 - 2.
Herrick, D. R. (2009, October). Google this!: using Google apps for collaboration and productivity. In Proceedings of the 37th annual ACM SIGUCCS fall conference: Communication and Collaboration (pp. 55-64). ACM.
Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley (content analysis).
Iftakhar, S. (2016). Google classroom: what works and how. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3(1), 12-18.
Inel, Y. (2018). The effect of using the 4MAT teaching method in 6th-grade social studies education on the academic achievement of students. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 8(3), 440-458.
Izenstark, A., & Leahy, K. L. (2015). Google classroom for librarians: Features and opportunities. Library Hi Tech News, 32(9), 1-3.
Jackson, P. R. (2001). The effects of teaching methods and 4MAT learning styles on community college students’ achievement, attitudes and retention in introductory microbiology, Doctoral Dissertation. The Lynn University, USA.
Janzen, M. (2014). Hot team: Google Classroom. Retrieved from: tlt. psu. edu/2014/12/04/hot-team-Googleclassroom.
Kaur, S. (2015). Teaching strategies used by Thai EFL lecturers to teach argumentative writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 208, 143-156.
Khalil, Z. M. (2018). EFL students’ perceptions towards using Google Docs and Google Classroom as online collaborative tools in learning grammar. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 2(2), 33-48.
Latif, S. (2016). Learning engagement in virtual environment. International Journal of Computer Applications, 148(11). 0975 – 8887.
Madhavi, B. K., Mohan, V., & Nalla, D. (2018). Improving attainment of graduate attributes using Google Classroom. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 31(3), 200-205.
Makkar, k. k. (2017). IELTS academic essays from the past exams. Chandigarh Publishing House.
McCarthy, B. (1980). The 4mat system: teaching to learning styles with left/right mode techniques. Arlington Heights.
McCarthy, B. (1990). Using 4MAT system to bring learning styles to schools. Educational Leadership, 48(2), 31-37.
McCarthy, B. (2000). About teaching 4MAT in the classroom. About Learning Incorporation.
McCarthy, B., & McCarthy, D. (2003). About teaching companion: the 4MAT implementation workbook. About Learning Incorporation.
McCarthy, B., & McCarthy, D. (2006). Teaching around the 4MAT cycle: designing instruction for diverse learners with diverse learning styles. Corwin Press.
McCarthy, B., Germain, C., & Lippitt, L. (2002). The 4MAT research guide. About Learning Incorporation.
McCarthy, B., White, C., & McNamara, M. C. (1987). 4MAT system: teaching to learning styles with right/left mode techniques. Barrington.
Mitchell, S., & Riddle, M. (2000). Improving the quality of argument in higher education: Final report. School of Lifelong Learning and Education, Middlesex University.
Moghaddam, S. (2015). An investigation of IELTS preparation courses for university study: development of written and verbal argumentative texts. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 2(4), 755-757.
Neff-van Aertselaer, J., & Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). Argumentation patterns in different languages: An analysis of meta-discourse markers in English and Spanish texts. Developing Contrastive Pragmatics Interlanguage and Cross-cultural Perspectives, 87-102.
Nicoll-Senft, J. M., & Seider, S. N. (2009). Assessing the impact of the 4MAT teaching model across multiple disciplines in higher education. College Teaching, 58(1), 19-27.
Nikolaou, A., & Koutsouba, M. (2012). Incorporating 4MAT model in distance instructional material–An innovative design. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 15(1). 1-10.
Nippold, M., & Ward-Lonergan, J. (2010). Argumentative writing in preadolescents: The role of verbal reasoning. Child Language Teaching and Therapy,23(3), 238–248.
Nowacki, A. S. (2011). Using 4MAT framework to design a problem-based learning biostatistics course. Journal of Statistics Education, 19(3).
Prensky, M. (2008). The role of technology. Educational Technology, 48(6), 1-3.
Putri, S., & Ramadhani, D. G. (2017). Communication effectiveness of online media Google Classroom in supporting the teaching and learning process at civil engineering University of Riau. Journal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Riau, 4(1), 1-15.
Ruangtrakun, T., & Chaiyasang, S. (2019). Using 4MAT teaching model to enhance students’ achievement and to maintain retention in mathematics. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University (Humanities, Social Sciences and arts), 12(6), 1248-1261.
Sampson, V., & Gleim, L. (2009). Argument-driven inquiry to promote the understanding of important concepts & practices in biology. The American Biology Teacher, 71(8), 465-472.
Sawant, S. B. (2020). Google Classroom for Techno-Savy teacher and students. Studies in Indian Place Names, 40(57), 96-101.
Schwarz, B. B., Neuman, Y., Gil, J., & Ilya, M. (2003). Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentation activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2). 219-256.
Scriven, M. (1976). Reasoning. McGraw-Hill.
Shah, V., Safaya, V., & Desai, J. (2016). Go green initiative from Google: A study of evolution in teaching and learning environment by Google Classroom. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science, 2(7).1073-1079.
Shaharanee, I. N. M., Jamil, J. M., & Rodzi, S. S. M. (2016, August). Google Classroom as a tool for active learning. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1761, No. 1, p. 020069). AIP Publishing LLC.
Sousa, D. A. (2016). Engaging the rewired brain. Learning Sciences International.
St Germain, C. (2002). Historical perspective: Major theories modeled in 4MAT system for teaching learning and leadership. About Learning.
Subandoro, P. S., & Sulindra, E. (2019). Optimizing collaborative learning: using google classroom in business English correspondence class. Vocatio: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Dan Sekretari, 2(1), 46-66.
Tatar, E., & Dikici, R. (2009). The effect of 4MAT method (learning styles and brain hemispheres) of instruction on achievement in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(8), 1027-1036.
Tezcan, G., & Güvenç, H. (2017). The effects of 4MAT teaching model and whole brain model on academic achievement in science. Egitim ve Bilim, 42(192).
Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, S. E., Rieke, R. D., & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning. Macmillan.
Trochim, W. M. (2005). Research methods: The concise knowledge base. Atomic Dog Publishing.
Walton, D. N. (1998). The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. University of Toronto Press.
Walton, D. N. (2007). Dialog theory for critical argumentation. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Wu, S. M. (2006). Creating a contrastive rhetorical stance: Investigating the strategy of problematization in students’ argumentation. RELC Journal, 37(3), 329–353.
Zakaria, M., Abd Manaf, K., Bustaman, H. A., Rahman, R. A., & Perak, M. A. R. A. (2020). Exploring benefits and challenges of adopting Google Classroom in the perspective of higher institution’s learners. The Mattingly Publishing, 83. 9739 – 9749.
Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(1), 79-101.
Zimmer, C. (2014). This is your brain on writing. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/19/science/researching-the-brain-of-writers.html.
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62.
| ||
|
Statistics Article View: 142 PDF Download: 269 |
||
