mossa, E., Abd Allah, A., Ammar, H., Mostafa, E. (2018). Efficacy, safety and stability of implantable collamer lens incorrection of high myopia. test, 22(3), 85-90. doi: 10.21608/smj.2018.31431
Elshimaa A.Mateen mossa; Ahmad Mustafa Abd Allah; Hatem Gamal Ammar; Engy Mohamed Mostafa. "Efficacy, safety and stability of implantable collamer lens incorrection of high myopia". test, 22, 3, 2018, 85-90. doi: 10.21608/smj.2018.31431
mossa, E., Abd Allah, A., Ammar, H., Mostafa, E. (2018). 'Efficacy, safety and stability of implantable collamer lens incorrection of high myopia', test, 22(3), pp. 85-90. doi: 10.21608/smj.2018.31431
mossa, E., Abd Allah, A., Ammar, H., Mostafa, E. Efficacy, safety and stability of implantable collamer lens incorrection of high myopia. test, 2018; 22(3): 85-90. doi: 10.21608/smj.2018.31431

Efficacy, safety and stability of implantable collamer lens incorrection of high myopia

Sohag Medical Journal
Article 10, Volume 22, Issue 3, October 2018, Pages 85-90    PDF (62.97 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/smj.2018.31431
Authors
Elshimaa A.Mateen mossa1; Ahmad Mustafa Abd Allah2; Hatem Gamal Ammar3; Engy Mohamed Mostafa3
1Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University.
2Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University.
3Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy, safety and stability of implantable collamer lens in high myopia.
METHODS:This study was non-randomized comparative prospective consecutive interventional study. It included 34 eyes with high myopia (≥ -6 Ds) attended to the outpatient ophthalmic clinic of Sohag university hospitals from the period from Jan.2016 to Jan.2017.
RESULTS:UCVA preoperative was (1.90±0.29) and UCVA postoperative was (0.27±0.21) with (p-value<0.000*). BCVA preoperative was (0.526±0.272) and that of BCVA postoperative was (0.217±0.128) with (p-value<0.001*),VA values are improved in 100% of cases which can be up to (0.1 logMAR or more) after 6 months follow up (p<0.000*).Spherical equivalent preoperative was (-15.173±4.079) and that of postoperative was (-0.269±0.787) with (p-value<0.000*), which didn’t change of spherical equivalent of manifest refraction ≥ 1.00 D within 6 months follow up period.
CONCLUSIONS:Implantable collamer lenses proved high efficacy, safety and stability for high myopic patients.
Keywords
High myopia; implantable collamer lens; Efficacy; safety; stability
References

1. Chung SH, Mazur E. Surgical applications of femtosecond lasers. Journal of biophotonics. 2009;2(10):557-72.

2. Lovisolo CF, Reinstein DZ. Phakic intraocular lenses. Survey of ophthalmology. 2005;50(6):549-87.

3. Sanders DR, Doney K, Poco M. United States Food and Drug Administration clinical trial of the Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) for moderate to high myopia: three-year follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(9):1683-92.

4. Lackner B, Pieh S, Schmidinger G, Simader C, Franz C, Dejaco-Ruhswurm I, et al. Long-term results of implantation of phakic posterior chamber intraocular lenses. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. 2004;30(11):2269-76.

5.Bloomenstein MR, Dulaney DD, Barnet RW, Perkins SA. Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens for moderate myopia and hyperopia. Optometry (St Louis, Mo). 2002;73(7):435-46.

6. Pesando PM, Ghiringhello MP, Di Meglio G, Fanton G. Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (ICL) for hyperopia: Ten-year follow-up. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2007;33(9):1579-84.

7.Sanders D, Vukich JA. Comparison of implantable collamer lens (ICL) and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for low myopia. Cornea. 2006;25(10):1139-46.

8.Schallhorn S, Tanzer D, Sanders DR, Sanders ML. Randomized prospective comparison of visian toric implantable collamer lens and conventional photorefractive keratectomy for moderate to high myopic astigmatism. Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, NJ : 1995). 2007;23(9):853-67.

9.Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Hikita F, Komatsu M. Posterior chamber toric phakic intraocular lens implantation for high myopic astigmatism in eyes with pellucid marginal degeneration. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. 2010;36(1):164-6.

10. Lesueur LC, Arne JL. Phakic posterior chamber lens implantation in children with high myopia. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. 1999;25(12):1571-5.

11. Sanders DR, Vukich JA, Doney K, Gaston M. U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial of the Implantable Contact Lens for moderate to high myopia. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(2):255-66.

12. Schmidinger G, Lackner B, Pieh S, Skorpik C. Long-term changes in posterior chamber phakic intraocular collamer lens vaulting in myopic patients. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(8):1506-11.

13. Lackner B, Pieh S, Schmidinger G, Hanselmayer G, Dejaco-Ruhswurm I, Funovics MA, et al. Outcome after treatment of ametropia with implantable contact lenses. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(11):2153-61.

14. Lee H, Kang SY, Seo KY, Chung B, Choi JY, Kim KS, et al. Dynamic vaulting changes in V4c versus V4 posterior chamber phakic lenses under differing lighting conditions. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(6):1199-204.e1.

15. Du C, Wang J, Wang X, Dong Y, Gu Y, Shen Y. Ultrasound biomicroscopy of anterior segment accommodative changes with posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens in high myopia. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(1):99-105.

16. Baumeister M, Buhren J, Kohnen T. Position of angle-supported, iris-fixated, and ciliary sulcus-implanted myopic phakic intraocular lenses evaluated by Scheimpflug photography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(5):723-31.

17. Chen X, Miao H, Naidu RK, Wang X, Zhou X. Comparison of early changes in and factors affecting vault following posterior chamber phakic Implantable Collamer Lens implantation without and with a central hole (ICL V4 and ICL V4c). BMC Ophthalmology. 2016;16(1):161.

18.Koch DD, Kohnen T, Obstbaum SA, Rosen ES. Format for reporting refractive surgical data. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. 1998;24(3):285-7.

19.Igarashi A, Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Komatsu M. Visual Performance after Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation and Wavefront-Guided Laser In Situ Keratomileusis for High Myopia. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2009;148(1):164-70.e1.

20. Sanders DR, Vukich JA. Comparison of implantable contact lens and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. Cornea. 2003;22(4):324-31.

21. Shin JY, Ahn H, Seo KY, Kim EK, Kim TI. Comparison of higher order aberrations after implantable Collamer Lens implantation and wavefront-guided LASEK in high myopia. Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, NJ : 1995). 2012;28(2):106-11.

22. Dougherty PJ, Priver T. Refractive outcomes and safety of the implantable collamer lens in young low-to-moderate myopes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:273-7.

23. Chen X, Guo L, Han T, Wu L, Wang X, Zhou X. Contralateral eye comparison of the long‐term visual quality and stability between implantable collamer lens and laser refractive surgery for myopia. Acta ophthalmologica. 2018.

24. Amar Agarwal M, Kumar DA. Visco-cannula assists in reinversion of phakic lens. Ocular Surgery News. 2009;20(4):25.

25. Hashemian SJ, Bigzadeh F, Foroutan A, Tajoddini S, Ghaempanah MJ, Jafari ME. Outcomes and Complications of Implantable Collamer Lens and Toric Implantable Collamer Lens for the Correction of High Myopia with and without Astigmatism (One Year Prospective Study). Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2013;25(1):8.

26. Senthil S, Choudhari NS, Vaddavalli PK, Murthy S, Reddy J, Garudadri CS. Etiology and management of raised intraocular pressure following posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation in myopic eyes. PloS one. 2016;11(11):e0165469.

 


 

Statistics
Article View: 297
PDF Download: 361