Implant loss in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review | ||
| Ain Shams Dental Journal | ||
| Article 5, Volume 26, Issue 2, June 2022, Pages 15-23 PDF (953.41 K) | ||
| Document Type: Systematic reviews/meta-analysis | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/asdj.2022.154686.1134 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Mohamed Talaat Khalifa* 1; Iman Abd-El Wahab Radi2; Nagla M.H. Nassouhy3; Mohamed Amr ElKahsab4 | ||
| 1cairo university | ||
| 2Professor of Prosthodontics, Member of Evidence Based dentistry Center, Head of Fundraising Unit, Head of Central Control Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. | ||
| 3Associate Professor of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. | ||
| 4Lecturer of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Objectives: The aim of this systematic review to evaluate the effect of diabetes on dental implants loss . Data Sources: Review authors searched 3 electronic databases; Pubmed, Cochrane and Lilacs: 11/10/2018, hand searched 11 journals till November 2018 and snowballing: 15/10/2018. Eligibility criteria: Adult female and male patients above 18 years old, either completely or partially edentulous, maxillary and/or mandibular dental implants, restored by fixed or removable prosthesis, were included. Surgical modifications, drugs that affect bone density, like vitamin D and biphosphonates, were excluded. Diabetic patients, who are classified either controlled or uncontrolled were considered eligible. Data Collection and Analysis: Review authors extracted data relevant to PECOT. Data was descriptively and statistically analyzed. Results: A 14 studies; 9 prospective and 5 retrospective studies, involving 1398 participants and 3282 implants, were included in this systematic review. 3 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Conclusion: Based on the results of implant loss 2 years following implant placement, implant therapy in diabetic patients seems to be possible. However, results should be taken with extreme cautions, since the quality of evidence is very low. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Diabetes mellitus; high blood sugar; Dental implants; Oral implants | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 148 PDF Download: 206 |
||
