Aiming for minimally invasive treatment of pediatric acute appendicitis in a district hospital | ||
| Annals of Pediatric Surgery | ||
| Volume 17, Issue 1, February 2021 PDF (831.67 K) | ||
| DOI: 10.1186/s43159-021-00088-6 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Toshiro Kimura* ; Yoshikazu Toyoki; Aika Ichisawa; Takahiro Yamada; Yusuke Wakasa; Hiroyuki Jin; Makoto Nakai; Kazunori Aoki; Hiroaki Kawashima; Masaaki Endo | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Background Appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdomen. Although emergency surgery used to be the standard treatment for both simple and complex appendicitis, there are now options for interval surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and even non-surgical treatment. In this study, we aimed to establish better treatment strategies for pediatric acute appendicitis and to find out whether minimally invasive treatment is superior to the traditional open approach. We retrospectively reviewed the cases of acute appendicitis treated in our hospital during the period from 2013 to 2018. The patients who underwent appendectomy were divided into four groups. Group 1 underwent early appendectomy with open approach, group2 underwent interval appendectomy with open approach, group 3 underwent early appendectomy with laparoscopic approach, and group 4 underwent interval appendectomy with laparoscopic approach. In addition to the above groups, the non-surgical treatment group was also studied. Clinical presentation, laboratory findings, imaging results, operative time, morbidity, and length of hospital stay were reviewed. Results One hundred six children’s records were reviewed. Thirty-five of them were selected for non-surgery as they were cases with no fecal stone and first onset appendicitis, and 15 of these 35 patients (42.9%) relapsed after antibiotic treatment. As for the appendix diameter, the relapse group was significantly larger than the non-relapse group (=0.007). In cases of surgery, group 4 had significantly less intraoperative blood loss than group 1 (<0.001). Group 4 had significantly fewer postoperative complications than groups 1 and 2 [group 4 vs. group 1 (=0.009), group 4 vs. group 2 (=0.034)]. The postoperative hospital stay in groups 2 and 4 were significantly shorter than group 1 [group 1 vs. group 2 (=0.015), group 1 vs. group 4 (<0.001)]. On the contrary, group 1 had significantly shorter total hospital stay than groups 2 and 4 [group 1 vs. group 2 (=0.029), group 1 vs. group 4 (<0.001)]. Conclusion Interval laparoscopic appendectomy and non-surgical treatment were safe and effective in children. From the viewpoint of avoiding unnecessary emergency surgery and prolonged hospitalization, we believe that interval laparoscopic appendectomy or non-surgical treatment should be performed after identifying patients who do not require surgery, paying attention to the risk factors for relapse. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| acute appendicitis; children; District hospital; Interval laparoscopic appendectomy; Gasless transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 29 PDF Download: 39 |
||
