(2022). Custodial Versus Conventional Cardioplegia for Myocardial Protection during Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. test, 6(1), -. doi: 10.21608/cvrepj.2022.351461
. "Custodial Versus Conventional Cardioplegia for Myocardial Protection during Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting". test, 6, 1, 2022, -. doi: 10.21608/cvrepj.2022.351461
(2022). 'Custodial Versus Conventional Cardioplegia for Myocardial Protection during Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting', test, 6(1), pp. -. doi: 10.21608/cvrepj.2022.351461
Custodial Versus Conventional Cardioplegia for Myocardial Protection during Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. test, 2022; 6(1): -. doi: 10.21608/cvrepj.2022.351461

Custodial Versus Conventional Cardioplegia for Myocardial Protection during Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Cardiovascular Research Prove Journal
Volume 6, Issue 1, June 2022    PDF (50.31 K)
Document Type: Abstracts
DOI: 10.21608/cvrepj.2022.351461
Abstract
We aimed to compare the clinical outcome of early 
coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using 
blood cardioplegia versus Custodial solution for 
myocardial protection in patients with recent ST 
elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). 
Statistics
Article View: 33
PDF Download: 26