Moustafa, A., Abdnaby, M., Essawy, A. (2024). Developing a product design process via a deeper understanding of user experience UX and collaborative design.. test, 14(4), 21-28. doi: 10.21608/idj.2024.286392.1144
Ahmed Waheed Moustafa; Mahmoud Abdnaby; Amera Mohammed Essawy. "Developing a product design process via a deeper understanding of user experience UX and collaborative design.". test, 14, 4, 2024, 21-28. doi: 10.21608/idj.2024.286392.1144
Moustafa, A., Abdnaby, M., Essawy, A. (2024). 'Developing a product design process via a deeper understanding of user experience UX and collaborative design.', test, 14(4), pp. 21-28. doi: 10.21608/idj.2024.286392.1144
Moustafa, A., Abdnaby, M., Essawy, A. Developing a product design process via a deeper understanding of user experience UX and collaborative design.. test, 2024; 14(4): 21-28. doi: 10.21608/idj.2024.286392.1144

Developing a product design process via a deeper understanding of user experience UX and collaborative design.

International Design Journal
Article 2, Volume 14, Issue 4 - Serial Number 62, July and August 2024, Pages 21-28    PDF (1.41 M)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/idj.2024.286392.1144
Authors
Ahmed Waheed Moustafa1; Mahmoud Abdnaby2; Amera Mohammed Essawy* 3
1Faculty of Applied Arts, Helwan University, Orman Giza
2Faculty of Applied Arts, Helwan University
3Faculty of Applied Arts, Helwan University, Giza, Egypt.
Abstract
This research discusses the benefits resulting from the impact of user experience and co-design in developing product design and illustrates this through finding models for companies and products that have used methods of understanding user experience and co-design to develop their products.
The research problem can be summarized in the following question: How can user experiences be leveraged in developing the product design process? This can branch into the following questions: What is the relationship between user experience and co-design?
Research objectives: The study aims to benefit from users’ experiences and expertise in developing product design processes, in addition to finding ways to endow products with the ability to entertain the user and assimilate their experience and capabilities.
Research hypotheses: Achieving user well-being for products begins with analyzing user experiences and developing the design process. The study proves that a conscious examination of user experiences contributes to the development of steps and methods in product design.
Research methodology: The research follows a descriptive and analytical approach.
Research importance: Linking user experiences and expertise with their relationship to developing the product design process. Establishing the appropriate vision for developing the product design process through user experiences, which will contribute to designing and producing new products that gain greater user satisfaction and empathy.
Keywords
Product Design; The Design Process; User Experience (Ux); Co-Design
Supplementary Files
References
  1. (ED), E. D. (2024, 3 28). What is Emotional Design (ED)? Retrieved from The Interaction Design Foundation: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/emotional-design
  2. Ahrendts, A. (2024, 4 2). Apple Marketing Strategy. Retrieved from https://voymedia.com/apple-marketing-strategy/
  3. Airfocus. (2024). what Is Personalization. Retrieved from Airfocus Glossary: https://airfocus.com/glossary/what-is-personalization/#:~:text=Personalization%20is%20the%20act%20of,in%20the%20product%20or%20service.
  4. Arhippainen, L., & Tahti, M. (2003). Empirical Evaluation of User ¨ Experience in Two Adaptive Mobile Application Prototypes. in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. Lulea, Sweden.
  5. Binder, T. (2007). Why Design:Labs? Proceedings of Design Inquiries ‘07. Retrieved from Available from
  6. Brandt, E. M. (2005). The design Lab: Re-thinking What to Design and How to Design. In B. Thomas, & H. Maria (Eds.), Design Spaces (Vol. 1, pp. 34-43). Finland: Edita Publishing Ltd IT Press.
  7. Chitturi, R. (2021). Visual design elements of product packaging: Implications for consumers' emotions, perceptions of quality, and price. Color Research & Application.
  8. Cooper, A., & Reimann, R. (2003). About Face 2.0: the essentials of interaction design. Indianapolis, Indiana: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  9. Dewey, J. (1980). Art as experience. New York: Perigee.
  10. Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience—a research agenda. Behaviour and Information Technology, vol. 25(no. 2), pp. 91–97.
  11. Ibrahim, H. S. (2014). Emotional Impact on Furniture Design (Action & Reaction).
  12. ISO. (2019). Ergonomics of human-system interaction Part 210. Human-centred design for interactive systems (2nd ed.). International Organization for Standardization.
  13. Kuniavsky, M. (2003). Observing the User Experience – A Practitioner’s Guide to User Research. (Elsevier, Ed.) Journal of Design interactions, 3(3).
  14. L. Finkelstein, A. F. (1983). Review of design methodology. Finkelstein, L., & Finkelstein,IEE Proceedings A (Physical Science, Measurement and Instrumentation, Management and Education, Reviews), 130(4), 213-222.
  15. Law, E., V. Roto, A. P., Kort, J., & Hassenzahl, a. M. (April 2008). Towards a shared definition of user experience. in Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’08), (pp. pp. 2395–2398). Florence, Italy.
  16. Lemon, K. N. (2016). Understanding Customer Experience Throughout the Customer Journey. Journal of Marketing.
  17. Muciri, N. (2024, 4 2). Tesla - Design Thinking Driving the Electric Vehicle Revolution |Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/case-study-tesla-design-thinking-driving-electric-vehicle-muciri/
  18. Muhammad Abdel Fattah Ali Hassan. (2007). The impact of the development of transmission and control systems on the performance and appearance of the product. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, 24. Faculty of Applied Arts, Helwan University.  (In Arabic)
  19. Mulder, I., & Stappers, P. (2009). Co-creating in Practice: Results and Challenges. Proceedings of 15th Internaltional Conference on Concurrent Enterprising ICE 2009, pp. Pp 1-8.
  20. Pieters, M., & Jansen, S. (2017). The 7 Principles of Complete Co-creation. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
  21. Rasmussen, J. (2000). Human factors in a dynamic information society: where are we heading? Ergonomics, vol. 43(no. 7), pp. 869– 879.
  22. Riecken, D. (2000). Introduction: Personalized Views of Personalization. Journal of Communications of the ACM, Vol.43(8), Pp 26-28.
  23. Roto, V. V. (2013). User Experience Evaluation Methods – Which Method to Choose? In the proceeding of CHI . Paris.
  24. Sanders, E. B. (2006). Scaffolds for Building Everyday Creativity. Design for Effective Communications: Creating Contexts for Clarity and Meaning. (J. Frascara, Ed.) New York: Allworth Press.
  25. Sanders, E. B., & Stappers, P. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Journal of CoDesign, Vol. 4(1), Pp 5 – 18.
  26. Schaik, E. L. (September 2010). Modelling user experience—an agenda for research and practice. Interacting with Computers, vol. 22( no. 5), pp. 313–322.
  27. Sinclair, M. (2012). The Specification of A Consumer Design Toolkit to Support Personalised Production Via Additive Manufacturing. Doctoral Thesis, 63. Loughborough University.
  28. Sun, X., & May, A. (2013). A Comparison of Field-Based and Lab-Based Experiments to Evaluate User Experience of Personalised Mobile Devices, Advances in Human-Computer Interaction. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2013, 9 pages. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/619767
  29.  Yasser Bandari. (2008). Considerations in the design and production of glass furniture for interior architecture. Department of Glass, Faculty of Applied Arts. (In Arabic)
Statistics
Article View: 501
PDF Download: 462