PREDICTING STANDARDIZED PRECIPITATION EVAPOTRANSPIRATION INDEX (SPEI) USING SVM AND ARIMA MODELS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY | ||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||
| Article 1, Volume 41, Issue 4, October 2024, Pages 263-278 PDF (649.7 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2024.301439.1139 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Amr Mossad1; Salwa Hassan Abdou* 2 | ||
| 1Assoc. Prof., Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Ain Shams U., Cairo, Egypt. | ||
| 2Assist. Prof., Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Ain Shams U., Cairo, Egypt | ||
| Abstract | ||
| This study evaluates the predictive performance of Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models in forecasting the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) for three critical agricultural regions in Egypt: Nubariyah, Wadi Al-Natrun, and Al-Boseli. Accurate SPEI forecasting is necessary for effective water management and agricultural planning, especially in arid regions. Through comprehensive analysis involving time series decomposition and model evaluation using Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE), ARIMA models consistently outperformed SVM models across all locations. The ARIMA (1,1,1) model showed superior predictive accuracy, with MSE reductions ranging from 1.4% to 14% over the SVM models. In Nubariyah, the ARIMA model achieved an MSE of 1.7499 compared to 1.7746 for the SVM model. In Wadi Al Natrun, the ARIMA model's MSE was 2.0735, significantly lower than the SVM model's 2.4113. In contrast, in Al Boseli, the ARIMA model recorded an MSE of 1.8033 versus 2.0844 for the SVM model. The decomposition of SPEI values into trend, seasonal, and residual components revealed a long-term trend towards increasing dryness over the 30 years, alongside regular annual fluctuations. These insights are essential for understanding climatic behavior and informing water management strategies. The ARIMA model's superior performance underscores its effectiveness in anticipating drought conditions and optimizing water usage. Research should explore advanced models like Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) to enhance forecasting accuracy further and expand the analysis to additional regions with more recent data to validate these findings, thereby improving drought prediction and water resource management. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Drought Prediction; Time Series Forecasting; Agricultural Water Management | ||
| References | ||
|
Beguería, S., Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Reig, F., and Latorre, B. (2014). Standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) revisited: Parameter fitting, evapotranspiration models, tools, datasets and drought monitoring. International Journal of Climatology, 34(10), 3001-3023. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3887.
Box, G. E. P., and Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. Holden-Day.
Ghosh, S., and Mujumdar, P. P. (2008). Statistical downscaling of GCM simulations to streamflow using relevance vector machine. Advances in Water Resources, 31(1), 132-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.07.005.
Cortes, C., and Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20, 273-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018.
De Livera, A.M., Hyndman, R.J., Snyder, R.D., 2011. Forecasting time series with complex seasonal patterns using exponential smoothing. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 106 (496), 1513–1527. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2011.tm09771.
Han, P., Wang, P.X., Zhang, S.Y., 2010. Drought forecasting based on the remote sensing data using ARIMA models. Math. Comp. Model. 51, 1398–1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2009.10.031.
Hao, Z., Singh, V.P., Xia, Y., (2018). Seasonal drought prediction: advances, challenges, and future prospects. Rev. Geophys. 56 (1), 108–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000549.
Hipel, K. W., & McLeod, A. I. (1994). Time series modelling of water resources and environmental systems. Elsevier.
Mishra, A.K., Singh, V.P., (2011). Drought modeling–a review. J. Hydrol. 403, 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.049.
Montanari, A., Rosso, R., and Taqqu, M. S. (2006). A seasonal fractional ARIMA model applied to the Nile River monthly flows at Aswan. Water Resources Research, 36(5), 1249-1259. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900002.
Shi, S., Yu, J., Wang, F., Wang, P., Zhang, Y., Jin, K., (2021). Quantitative contributions of climate change and human activities to vegetation changes over multiple time scales on the Loess Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. 755 (Pt 2), 142419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142419.
Smola, A. J., and Schölkopf, B. (2004). A tutorial on support vector regression. Statistics and Computing, 14, 199-222. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88.
Thornthwaite, C.W., 1948. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geographical Rev., 38: 55-94. DOI: 10.2307/210739.
Vicente-Serrano, S.M., Beguería, S., López-Moreno, J.I., 2010. A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. J. Clim. 23 (7), 1696–1718. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2909.1.
Wu, X., Zhou, J., Yu, H., Liu, D., Xie, K., Chen, Y., Hu, J., Sun, H., Xing, F., 2021. The development of a hybrid wavelet-ARIMA-LSTM model for precipitation amounts and drought analysis. Atmosphere 12, 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12010074.
Xu, D., Zhang, Q., Ding, Y., Zhang, D., (2022). Application of a hybrid ARIMA-LSTM model based on the SPEI for drought forecasting. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 29 (3), 4128–4144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15325-z.
Yao, N., Li, Y., Liu, Q., Zhang, S., Chen, X., Ji, Y., Liu, F., Pulatov, A., Feng, P., (2022). Response of wheat and maize growth yields to meteorological and agricultural droughts based on standardized precipitation evapotranspiration indexes and soil moisture deficit indexes. Agric. Water Manag. 266, 107566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107566.
Zhou, Z., Ding, Y., Shi, H., Cai, H., Fu, Q., Liu, S., Li, T., (2020). Analysis and prediction of vegetation dynamic changes in China: past, present and future. Ecol. Indicat. 117, 106642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106642. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 290 PDF Download: 302 |
||
