EVALUATION OF RETENTION AND STRAINS INDUCED ON ANTERIOR AND PIER ABUTMENTS IN KENNEDY CLASS II MODIFICATION 1 CASES RESTORED BY PARTIAL TELESCOPIC OVERDENTURES CONSTRUCTED DIGITALLY FROM TWO DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS: AN INVITRO STUDY | ||
| Egyptian Dental Journal | ||
| Volume 70, Issue 4, October 2024, Pages 3631-3644 PDF (1.48 M) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/edj.2024.308842.3142 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Reham Alaa El Sharabasy1; Sahar Ahmed Kortam* 2 | ||
| 1Lecturer of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Beni-Suef University, Beni Suef | ||
| 2Associate professor-Removable prosthodontics , Faculty of Dentistry , Beni-Suef University | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Aim:evaluating the retention, measuring the amount of stresses transmitted to the principal and pier abutments and ridge in mandibular Kennedy class II restored by milled (PEKK) partial telescopic over-denture as compared to that of milled chrome cobalt.Methodology: Both abutments were reduced to receive telescopic Co-Cr primary crowns and the usual preparation for class II partial denture was made on intact side. Twelve partial telescopic overdentures (PTO) frameworks were milled from two materials. Group I (GR I), six PTO frameworks were milled using Co-Cr, while the other six PTO frameworks of group II (GR II) were milled using poly –ether ketone ketone (PEKK). Each PTO was seated on its cast to be placed within chewing simulator where PTO was exposed to insertion/removal and loading cycles Retention was evaluated.Strains induced within both abutments and supporting ridge were measured using five strain gauges.Results: For chrome-cobalt PTO had significantly higher retention than that expressed by PEKK PTO framework. under both unilateral and bilateral loading, pier abutment received much more strains than that exerted on principal abutment, additionally distal surfaces of both abutments expressed higher significant strains than mesial surfaces. Under both unilateral and bilateral loading, chrome-cobalt PTO (GR I) framework exerted higher significant strains on proximal surfaces of abutments than that expressed by PEKK PTO (GR II) framework. Conclusion: PEKK PTO could be a promising option in cases of Kennedy class II having pier abutment. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Pier abutment; telescopic overdenture. kennedy class II; retention | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 107 PDF Download: 133 |
||
