Variables Influencing Academic Staff Performance at Egyptian Universities | ||
| المجلة العلمية للدراسات التجارية والبيئية | ||
| Article 85, Volume 15, Issue 3, July 2024, Pages 1729-1761 PDF (807.99 K) | ||
| Document Type: المقالة الأصلية | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/jces.2024.391577 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Abdullah Radwan* 1; Sahar Mohamed Badawy* 2 | ||
| 1Faculty of Pharmacy, Egyptian Russian University, Cairo 11829, Egypt | ||
| 2Faculty of Business Administration, Economics and Political Science, Business Department, British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt | ||
| Abstract | ||
| A well-produced performance will ensure that an organization runs smoothly. This study investigates the performance of academic personnel. The performance that will be produced is also very dependent on the leadership, ability to use technology and work environment and the work performance of the employees. So that the existence of those factors makes lecturers' performance better and more precise, will be able to make the organization better. This study aims to analyze the effect of different leadership styles, ability to use technology and work environment on lecturer performance with job satisfaction as mediation at universities in Egypt. The approach used in this research is quantitative. The population in this study were academic staff in different universities in Egypt, with a sample size of 360 respondents. The loading, cronbach’s α, rho-a and AVE are used to examin the constructs. All Cronbach’s alpha values are more than 0.7 and factor loading is more than 0.50. Correlation, regression analysis and structural equation modeling was employed to test research hypotheses. This study finds that transformational leadership style tends to motivate to work better which has a great impact on overall performance. In addition, it suggests that improving the work environment and work environment can significantly increase job satisfaction and performance outcomes at universities in Egypt | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Transformational leadership; Transduction leadership; Academic staff performance; Job satisfaction; Ability to use technology; Work enviroment | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 46 PDF Download: 42 |
||
