العوامل التي تؤثر على استخدام أنظمة الاستجابة الشخصية من وجهة نظر طلبة الماجستير مع نموذج موور للتفاعل Moore interaction model •

المراجع:

المطیری، شیخة. )1436(. أثر استخدام أنظمة الاستجابة الشخصیة على بیئة تعلم مادة الریاضیات لدى طالبات المرحلة الثانویة بمدینة الریاض: النظریة البنائیة فی تحدید العوامل المؤثرة على تفاعل الطلاب، (ماجستیر غیر منشور). جامعة الملک سعود. المملکة العربیة السعودیة.

مرکز التمیز بجامعة الملک سعود. (2016). تم استرجاعه فی، April 11, 2016، من https://news.ksu.edu.sa/ar/node/110433

المراجع الأجنبیة:

Addison, S., Wright, A., & Milner, R. (2009). Using clickers to improve student engagement and performance in an introductory biochemistry class. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 37(2), 84-91.‏

Al-Hojailan, M. I. A. (2013). The effectiveness of the social network in higher education in Saudi Arabia: action research to develop an e-learning conceptual model based on blog tools.UK:DMU.

Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. USA: John Wiley & Sons.‏

Arksey, H., & Knight, P. T. (1999). Interviewing for social scientists: An introductory resource with examples. UK: Sage.‏

Baltaci-Goktalay, S. (2016). How Personal Response Systems Promote Active Learning in Science Education?. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age (JOLTIDA), 1(1),          47-54.‏

Bruff. (n.d.). Classroom Response Systems (“Clickers”). Retrieved April 11, 2016, from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/clickers/

Centre for teaching excellence in Waterloo University. (2014, June 12). Retrieved April 11, 2016, from https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/ teaching- resources/ teaching- tips/ educational-technologies/ all/clickers

Cohen, Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education (7th ed.). UK: Routledge.

Cook, R., & Calkins, S. (2013). More than recall and opinion: Using clickers to promote complex thinking. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 24(2), 51-76.‏

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. UK: Sage publications.‏

Denker, K. J. (2013). Student response systems and facilitating the large lecture basic communication course: Assessing engagement and learning. Communication Teacher, 27(1), 50-69.‏

Garrison, D. R. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. UK: Taylor & Francis.‏

Holmberg, B. (1986). Growth and structure of distance education. USA: Croom-Helm.

Hong, K. S., Lim, C. Y. B., & Ngu, L. H. (2012). An Exploratory Study of Clickers among Students at a Malaysian Tertiary Institution. Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 13–23.

Hwang, I., Wong, K., Lam, S. L., & Lam, P. (2015). Student Response (Clicker) Systems: Preferences of Biomedical Physiology Students in Asian Classes. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(5), 319-330.‏

King, S. O., & Robinson, C. L. (2012). The impact of using electronic voting systems for university mathematics teaching: a multi-institutional perspective. Retrieved from https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/handle/2134/14761

Lopez, J. A., Love, C., & Watters, D. (2014). Clickers in Biosciences: Do they Improve Academic Performance?. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education (formerly CAL-laborate International), 22(3).‏

Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2).

Noel, D., Stover, S., & McNutt, M. (2015). Student perceptions of engagement using mobile-based polling as an audience response system: Implications for leadership studies. Journal of Leadership Education DOI, 1012806(V14/I3), R4.‏

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. UK: Sage Publications.

Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., & Abrahamson, L. (2004). The networked classroom. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 50-54.‏

Schön, D., Yang, L., Klinger, M., Kopf, S., & Effelsberg, W. (2015a). On the Effects of Different Parameters in Classroom Interactivity Systems on Students. Computers & Education, 82, 217–227.

Schön, D., Yang, L., Klinger, M., Kopf, S., & Effelsberg, W. (2015b). On the Effects of Different Parameters in Classroom Interactivity Systems on Students. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 559–567). Retrieved from http://pi4.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/~kopf/publications/2015/Schoen_2015a.pdf

Sharma, A. (2016). Attitudes of medical students toward use of clickers for assessment in classrooms: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Innovations in Medical Education and Research, 2(1), 60-63.‏

Somekh, B., Haldane, M., Jones, K., Lewin, C., Steadman, S., Scrimshaw, P., … others. (2007). Evaluation of the primary schools whiteboard expansion project. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/21564/1/whiteboards_expansion.pdf

Titman, A. C., & Lancaster, G. A. (2011). Personal response systems for teaching postgraduate statistics to small groups. Journal of Statistics Education, 19(2), 1-20.‏

Wang, A. I. (2015). The wear out effect of a game-based student response system. Computers & Education, 82, 217-227.‏

Yin, R. K. (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish. USA: Guilford Publications.‏