CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC STUDY OF HEALING OF MANDIBULAR FRACTURES USING PLASMA RICH FIBRIN MEMBRANE WITH MINIPLATE FIXATION | ||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||
| Article 8, Volume 43, Issue 1, April 2018, Pages 41-47 PDF (661.67 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2018.57595 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Amany M. Al Rayess1; Mostafa M. El Dibany2; Lydia N. Melek3 | ||
| 1BDS, Alexandria University, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University. | ||
| 2Professor at Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University | ||
| 3Lecturer at Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University | ||
| Abstract | ||
| INTRODUCTION: The development of bioactive surgical additives to regulate the inflammation and increase the speed of the healing process is one of the greatest challenges in clinical research. Various materials and techniques have been developed to enhance the process of fracture bone healing and to fasten it. Numerous techniques using autologous platelet concentrates have been developed and applied; platelet rich fibrin [PRF] being one of them, one that is completely autogenous in nature, simple and relatively inexpensive with a specific three-dimensional architecture of the fibrin. PRF has also shown increased levels of numerous cytokines and growth factors that influence bony regeneration. OBJECTIVES: The aim in this study was to compare between fracture healing using miniplates with and without PRF membrane in bilateral mandibular fractures clinically and radiographically. MATERIALS AND METHODS: all twelve patients had bilateral mandibular fractures. Each patient was treated as follows: (Study Group): The mandibular fracture on the right side was treated by using the conventional 2.0 mm miniplates and screws with placement of PRF membrane. (Control Group): The mandibular fracture on the left side was treated by using the conventional 2.0 mm miniplates and screws. Follow-up was carried out every week during the first month, then at three months, and six months postoperatively. RESULTS: none of the patients in either of the groups had an infection or signs of nonunion within the follow- up period. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean value of pain score between the fractures in the two groups. In both groups, edema was limited to the area of operation and resolved completely by the end of 4th week postoperatively. On immediate, 3 and 6 months postoperatively, the mean bone density in the study group was statistically significantly higher than the control group, but the percentage change in the bone density from immediate postoperative to 3 months, immediate postoperative to 6 months and from 3 to 6 months was not statistically significant comparing the two groups CONCLUSIONS: PRF application on the fracture line in the mandible may be helpful in improvement of the fracture healing but comparing the two groups, the pattern of improvement was nearly the same along time. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| alveolar bone; fish oil; Induced rheumatoid arthritis; Freund's complete adjuvant | ||
| References | ||
|
1. Devadiga A, Prasad KSV. Epidemiology of Maxillofacial Fractures and Concomitant Injuries in a Craniofacial Unit: A Retrospective Study. Internet J Epidemiol. 2008; 5: 1-7.
2. Sojot AJ, Meisami T, Sandor GK, Clokie CM. The epidemiology of mandibular fractures treated at the Toronto general hospital: A review of 246 cases. J Can Dent Assoc. 2001; 67: 640-4.
3. Andersson L, Kahnberg KE, Pogrel MA. Oral and maxillofacial surgery. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. P. 883.
4. Fonseca RJ. Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma. 4th ed. St. Louis: Saunders; 2013. P. 14-16.
5. Prakash S, Thakur A. Platelet Concentrates Past, Present, and Future. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2011; 10: 45-9.
6. Choukroun J, Diss A, Simonpieri A, Girard MO, Schoeffler C, Dohan SL, et al. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): A second-generation platelet concentrate. Part V: Histologic evaluations of PRF effects on bone allograft maturation in sinus lift. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 101: 299-303.
7. Anitua E, Sánchez M, Nurden AT, Nurden P, Orive G, Andía I. New insights into and novel applications for platelet-rich fibrin therapies. Trends Biotechnol. 2006; 24: 227-34.
8. Tunali M, Özdemir H, Küçükodaci Z, Akman S, Firatli E. In vivo evaluation of titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin (T-PRF): A new platelet concentrate. Br J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2013; 51: 438-43.
9. Naik B, Karunakar P, Jayadev M, Marshal VR. Role of Platelet rich fibrin in wound healing: A critical review. J Conserv Dent. 2013; 16: 284-93.
10. Dohan DM, Choukroun J, Diss A, Dohan SL, Dohan AJJ, Mouhyi J, et al. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): A second-generation platelet concentrate. Part II: Plateletrelated biologic features. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 101: 45-50.
11. Sakr K, Farag IA, Zeitoun IM. Review of 509 mandibular fractures treated at the University Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 44: 107-11.
12. van den Bergh B, Heymans MW, Duvekot F, Forouzanfar T. Treatment and complications of mandibular fractures: a 10-year analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012; 40: e108-11.
13. de Lima APCB, Semenoff TADV, da Silva NF, Naclerio-Homem MG, Borba AM, Borges AH, et al. Epidemiological analysis of facial fractures. Sci J Dent. 2015; 2: 1-4.
14. Sirimaharaj W, Pyungtanasup K. The epidemiology of mandibular fractures treated at Chiang Mai University Hospital: A review of 198 cases. J Med Assoc Thail. 2008; 91: 868-74.
15. Kumar N, Prasad K, Ramanujam L, K R, Dexith J, Chauhan A. Evaluation of Treatment Outcome after Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery with the Use of Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 73: 1042-9.
16. Tay AB, Lai JB, Lye KW, Wong WY, Nadkarni NV, Li W, et al. Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury in TraumaInduced Mandible Fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 73: 1328-40.
17. Kennedy JM, Zochodne DW. Impaired peripheral nerve regeneration in diabetes mellitus. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2005; 10: 144-57.
18. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006; 72: 75-80.
19. Angelopoulos C, Scarfe WC, Farman AG. A Comparison of Maxillofacial CBCT and Medical CT. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2012; 20: 1- 17.
20. Ng AM, Saim AB, Tan KK, Tan GH, Mokhtar SA, Rose IM, et al. Comparison of bioengineered human bone construct from four sources of osteogenic cells. J Orthop Sci. 2005; 10: 192-9.
21. Kobayashi M, Kawase T, Horimizu M, Okuda K, Wolff LF, Yoshie H. A proposed protocol for the standardized preparation of PRF membranes for clinical use. Biologicals. 2012; 40: 323-9.
22. Su CY, Kuo YP, Tseng YH, Su CH, Burnouf T. In vitro release of growth factors from platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a proposal to optimize the clinical applications of PRF. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 108: 56-61.
23. Zhang Y, Tangl S, Huber CD, Lin Y, Qiu L, Rausch-Fan X. Effects of Choukroun’s platelet-rich fibrin on bone regeneration in combination with deproteinized bovine bone mineral in maxillary sinus augmentation: A histological and histomorphometric study. J CranioMaxillofacial Surg. 2012; 40:321–8.
24. Al-Khawlani E, Adly OA, Hamed TA, Abass AH, Abdelmabood AA. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of platelet-rich fibrin gel on the outcome of mandibular fracture. Egyptian J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 5: 77- 83.
25. Dülgeroglu TC, Metineren H. Evaluation of the Effect of Platelet-Rich Fibrin on Long Bone Healing: An Experimental Rat Model. Orthopedics. 2017; 40: e479- 84.
26. Faot F, Deprez S, Vandamme K, Camargos GV, Pinto N, Wouters J, et al. The effect of L-PRF membranes on bone healing in rabbit tibiae bone defects: micro-CT and biomarker results. Sci Rep. 2016; 7: 1-10. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 376 PDF Download: 821 |
||
