EVALUATION OF THE USE OF ALVEOLAR BLOCK FROM MAXILLARY TUBEROSITY FOR AUGMENTATION OF ANTERIOR MAXILLARY DEFECTS | ||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||
| Article 20, Volume 43, Issue 1, April 2018, Pages 111-116 PDF (649.53 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2018.57610 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Mohamed A. Aboushara1; Mostafa M. Eldibany2; Nagy P. Hassan2 | ||
| 1- Instructor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt. | ||
| 2Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| INTRODUCTION: Maxillofacial bone defects occur for various reasons as infections, tumor and cysts or physiologic loss of bone after extraction of teeth. There are a lot of controversies among dental practitioners in the material used for filling of bone defects to increase the volume of bone in favor of good placement of the implant. Autogenous bone is the gold standard for bone reconstruction due to osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive properties. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinically and radiographically the efficiency of using maxillary tuberosity as a block bone graft for augmentation of anterior maxillary defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with anterior maxillary bone defects were treated with bone graft harvested from the maxillary tuberosity with an age range of 20 and 50 years old. Piezotome 2 was used for bone harvesting from the tuberosity. Osteosynthesis microscrews were used to fix the block graft in place. RESULTS: Bone density and width showed statistical significant difference detected by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). CONCLUSIONS: The large and accessible maxillary tuberosity is a reliable source to use as autogenous bone block for augmentation of jaw defects | ||
| Keywords | ||
| autogenous bone graft; maxillary tuberosity; guided bone regeneration (GBR); piezosurgery | ||
| References | ||
|
1. Palti A, Hoch T. A concept for the treatment of various dental bone defects. Implant Dent. 2002;11(1):73-8.
2. Belser UC, Schmid B, Higginbottom F, Buser D. Outcome analysis of implant restorations located in the anterior maxilla: a review of the recent literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:30-42.
3. Higginbottom F, Belser U, Jones JD, Keith SE. Prosthetic management of implants in the esthetic zone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:62-72.
4. Khojasteh A, Soheilifar S, Mohajerani H, Nowzari H. The effectiveness of barrier membranes on bone regeneration in localized bony defects: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(4).
5. Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:49-70.
6. Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:237-59.
7. Jensen SS, Terheyden H. Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: clinical results with different bone grafts and bone-substitute materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:218-36.
8. Hassani A, Khojasteh A, Shamsabad AN. The anterior palate as a donor site in maxillofacial bone grafting: a quantitative anatomic study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(8):1196-200.
9. Singh S. Management of infrabony defects in mandibular molars in a patient with generalized aggressive periodontitis using autogenous bone graft from maxillary tuberosity. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2010;14(1):53-6.
10.Khojasteh A, Behnia H, Soleymani Shayesteh Y, Morad G, Alikhasi M. Localized bone augmentation with cortical bone blocks tented over different particulate bone substitutes: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(6).
11.Tolstunov L. Maxillary tuberosity block bone graft: innovative technique and case report. J oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(8):1723-9.
12.Gomes KU, Carlini JL, Biron C, Rapoport A, Dedivitis RA. Use of allogeneic bone graft in maxillary reconstruction for installation of dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(11):2335-8.
13.Brydone A, Meek D, Maclaine S. Bone grafting, orthopaedic biomaterials, and the clinical need for bone engineering. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2010;224(12):1329-43.
14.Seibert JS. Reconstruction of deformed, partially edentulous ridges, using full thickness onlay grafts. Part I. Technique and wound healing. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1983;4(5):437-53.
15.Reeves TE, Mah P, McDavid WD. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam CT: a clinical application. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41(6):500-8.
16.Mah P, Reeves TE, McDavid WD. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39(6):323-35.
17.Sohn DS, Ahn MR, Lee WH, Yeo DS, Lim SY. Piezoelectric osteotomy for intraoral harvesting of bone blocks. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007;27(2):127-31.
18. Happe A. Use of a piezoelectric surgical device to harvest bone grafts from the mandibular ramus: report of 40 cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007;27(3):241- 9.
19.Chiriac G, Herten M, Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Becker J. Autogenous bone chips: influence of a new piezoelectric device (Piezosurgery) on chip morphology, cell viability and differentiation. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(9):994-9.
20.Buser D. years of guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry, 2010. New Malden: Quintessence Publishing Co Ltd; 2009.
21.Lundgren AK, Lundgren D, Hammerle CH, Nyman S, Sennerby L. Influence of decortication of the donor bone on guided bone augmentation. An experimental study in the rabbit skull bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11(2):99- 106.
22.Buser D, Brägger U, Lang N, Nyman S. Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1990;1(1):22-32.
23.Schmid J, Wallkamm B, Hammerle CH, Gogolewski S, Lang NP. The significance of angiogenesis in guided bone regeneration. A case report of a rabbit experiment. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8(3):244-8.
24.Alberius P, Gordh M, Lindberg L, Johnell O. Onlay bone graft behaviour after marrow exposure of the recipient rat skull bone. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1996;30(4):257-66.
25.Alberius P, Gordh M, Lindberg L, Johnell O. Effect of cortical perforations of both graft and host bed on onlay incorporation to the rat skull. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996;104(5- 6):554-61.
26.Gordh M, Alberius P, Lindberg L, Johnell O. Bone graft incorporation after cortical perforations of the host bed. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;117(6):664-70.
27.Greenstein G, Greenstein B, Cavallaro J, Tarnow D. The role of bone decortication in enhancing the results of guided bone regeneration: a literature review. J Periodontol. 2009;80(2):175-89.
28.Montazem A, Valauri DV, St-Hilaire H, Buchbinder D. The mandibular symphysis as a donor site in maxillofacial bone grafting: a quantitative anatomic study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58(12):1368-71.
29.Khojasteh A, Nazeman P, Tolstunov L. Tuberosity-alveolar block as a donor site for localised augmentation of the maxilla: a retrospective clinical study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;54(8):950-5.
30.Chen ST, Beagle J, Jensen SS, Chiapasco M, Darby I. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding surgical techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:272-8.
31.Garg AK. Bone. Biology, harvesting, grafting for dental implants (Rationale and Applications). 2004:3-20.
32.Silva FMS, Cortez ALV, Moreira RWF, Mazzonetto R. Complications of intraoral donor site for bone grafting prior to implant placement. Implant Dent. 2006;15(4):420-6.
33.Araujo M, Sonohara M, Hayacibara R, Cardaropoli G, Lindhe J. Lateral ridge augmentation by the use of grafts comprised of autologous bone or a biomaterial. An experiment in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29(12):1122-31.
34.Urbani G, Lombardo G, Santi E, Tarnow D. Localized ridge augmentation with chin grafts and resorbable pins: case reports. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1998;18(4):363-75. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 254 PDF Download: 683 |
||
