ATTITUDES OF DENTAL INTERNS TOWARDS LEARNING COMMUNICATION SKILLS IN ALEXANDRIA UNIVERSITY | ||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||
| Article 4, Volume 42, Issue 1, April 2017, Pages 20-27 PDF (884.05 K) | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2017.57852 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Sara M. Atteya* 1; Suzan M. Saleh2; Wafaa A. Essam3 | ||
| 1Instructor at the Pediatric and Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University | ||
| 2Professor of Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University. | ||
| 3Professor of Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University | ||
| Abstract | ||
| INTRODUCTION: Effective communication not only improves dentist-patient relationships, but also enhances the patient’s satisfaction towards the profession. Dental students are generally receptive to learning communication skills during their academic education and their appreciation for the value of these skills can be significantly improved with training. OBJECTIVES:The objective of this study was to compare the attitudes of dental interns towards learning communication skills at both Faculty of Dentistry Alexandria University (public) and Pharos University (private). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study using a s questionnaire was carried out among dental interns graduated from the Faculty of Dentistry of Alexandria University (AU) and Pharos University (PU), in 2014. A self-administered, twenty-four-items, Dental Communication Skills Attitude Scale (DCSAS) that contained both positive (PAS) and negative (NAS) attitude subscales was distributed. Participants’ demographic and education related variables were also recorded. Association of the positive and negative attitudes with these variables was determined using appropriate statistical tests as Pearson’s chi square test, Monte Carlo Exact test, Fisher’s Exact and one way ANOVA. RESULTS: A total of 240 dental interns from Alexandria University and 162 dental interns from Pharos University participated in the study, with a response rate of 70.59% and 82.65%, respectively. The mean PAS scores and NAS scores in both universities were almost the same, 52/65 and 31/55, respectively with no significant difference between them. These attitudes were significantly associated with certain background and education-related attributes as gender, age, parents education and previous communication skills training. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the differences in communication skills curriculum, dental interns of both AU and PU had an overall positive and neutral attitude towards communication skills learning with no statistical significant difference between them | ||
| Keywords | ||
| communication; Learning; dentist-patient relationship; dental interns; alexandria | ||
| References | ||
|
1. Keyton J. Communication and organizational culture: A key to understanding work experiences. California: Sage Publications; 2010: 16.
2. Street RL Jr, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinicianpatient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 74: 295-301.
3. Hottel TL, Hardigan PC. Improvement in the interpersonal communication skills of dental students. J Dent Educ 2005;69: 281-4.
4. Hannah A, Millichamp CJ, Ayers KMS. A communication skills course for undergraduate dental students. J Dent Educ 2004; 68: 970-7.
5. Brown G, Manogue M, Rohlin M. Assessing attitudes in dental education: Is it worthwhile? B Dent J 2002; 193: 703-70
6. Krupat E, Hiam CM, Fleming MZ, Freeman P. Patientcenteredness and its correlates among first year medical students. Int J Psychiatry Med 1999; 29: 347-56.
7. Petty RE, Wegener DT, Fabrigar LR. Attitudes and attitude change. Annu Rev Psychol 1997; 48: 609-47.
8. American Dental Education Association. ADEA competencies for the new general dentist (as approved by the 2008 ADEA House of Delegates). J Dent Educ 2012; 76: 891-4.
9. Wagner J, Arteaga S, D’Ambrosio J, Hodge CE, Ioannidou E, Pfeiffer CA, et al. A patient-instructor program to promote dental students’ communication skills with diverse patients. J Dent Educ 2007 ;71: 1554- 60
10. General Dental Council. The first five years. The undergraduate curriculum. 3rd ed (Interim report). London: General Dental Council; 2008
11.Rees C, Sheard C, Davies S. The development of a scale to measure medical students' attitudes towards communication skills learning: The Communication Skills Attitude Scale (CSAS). Med Educ 2002; 36: 141- 7.
12. Lumma-Sellenthin A. Students’ attitudes towards learning communication skills: correlating attitudes, demographic and meta-cognitive variables. Int J Med Educ 2012; 3: 201-8
13. Yoshida T, Milgrom P, Coldwell S. How do U.S. and Canadian dental schools teach interpersonal communication skills? J Dent Educ 2002; 66: 1281-8.
14.Broder HL, Janal M. Promoting interpersonal skills and cultural sensitivity among dental students. J Dent Educ 2006; 70: 409-16.
15. Laurence B, Bertera EM, Feimster T, Hollander R, StromanC. Adaptation of the Communication Skills Attitude Scale (CSAS) to Dental Students. J Dent Educ 2012; 76: 1629-38.
16. Kahari L, Takavarasha P. A study of University of Zimbabwe Medical Student’s Attitudes towards the teaching and learning of communication skills. Int J of Adv Res 2013; 1: 35-42
17.Carey J, Madill A, Manogue M. Communication skills in dental education: a systematic research review. Eur J Dent Educ 2010; 14: 69-78.
18. Sherman JJ, Cramer A. Measurement of changes in empathy during dental school. J Dent Educ 2005; 69: 338- 45.
19. Yoshida T, Milgrom P, Coldwell S. How do U.S. and Canadian dental schools teach interpersonal communication skills? J Dent Educ 2002; 66: 1281-8.
20. Nor NA, Yusof ZY, Shahidan MN. University of Malaya dental students' attitudes towards communication skills learning: implications for dental education. J Dent Educ 2011; 75: 1611-9.
21. Kurtz SM. Doctor-patient communication: principles and practices. Canadian J Neurol Sci 2002; 29: S23-S9.
22. Hannah A, Millichamp CJ, Ayers KM. A communication skills course for undergraduate dental students. J Dent Educ 2004; 68: 970-7.
23.Rees C, Garrud P. Identifying undergraduate medical students' attitudes towards communication skills learning: a pilot study. Med Teach 2001; 23: 400-6.
24. Khashab SS. Attitudes of Alexandria Medical Students towards Communication Skills Learning. J Egypt Public Health Assoc 2006; 81: 355-72. 2
25. Shankar P, Dubey A, Balasubramanium R, Dwivedi N. Student attitude towards communication skills learning in a Caribbean medical school. Australas Med J 2013; 6: 466-75.
26.Rees C, Sheard C. The relationship between medical students' attitudes towards communication skills learning and their demographic and education-related characteristics. Med Educ 2002; 36: 1017-27.
27. Wright KB, Bylund C, Ware J, Parker P, Query JL, Baile W. Medical student attitudes toward communication skills training and knowledge of appropriate providerpatient communication: a comparison of first-year and fourth-year medical students. Med Educ 2006; 11: 1-10.
28.Batenburg V, Smal J. Does a communication course influence medical students' attitudes? Med Teach 1997; 19: 263-9.
29. Kassebaum DG, Cutler ER. On the culture of student abuse in medical school. Acad Med 1998; 73: 1149-58.
30.Roter DL, Hall JA. Why physician gender matters in shaping the physician-patient relationship. J Women's Health 1998; 7: 1093-7.
31. Doherty E, McGee HM, O'Boyle CA, Shannon W, Bury G, Williams A. Communication skills training in undergraduate medicine: attitudes and attitude change. Ir Med J 1992; 85: 104-7.
32. Langille DB, Kaufman DM, Laidlaw TA, Sargeant J, MacLeod H. Faculty attitudes towards medical communication and their perceptions of students' communication skills training at Dalhousie University. Med Educ 2001; 35: 548-54.
33. Liddell MJ, Davidson SK. Student attitudes and their academic performance: is there any relationship? Med Teach 2004; 26: 52-6.
34.Rees C, Sheard C. Evaluating first-year medical students' attitudes to learning communication skills before and after a communication skills course. Med Teach 2003; 25: 302-7. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 338 PDF Download: 680 |
||
