TRANSCRESTAL SINUS LIFT AND IMPLANT PLACEMENT USING THE SINUS BALLOON TECHNIQUE | ||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||
| Article 4, Volume 41, Issue 3, December 2016, Pages 245-252 PDF (832.35 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2016.58034 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Ashraf A. Elbareki1; Sameh A. Darwish2; Ragab S. Hassan2 | ||
| 1- B.D.S.Faculty of Dentistry Tripoli University | ||
| 2Professor of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| INTRODUCTION: Rehabilitation of the edentulous posterior maxilla with dental implants is challenging. The deficient alveolar ridge interferes with implant insertion of adequate length placed in the correct position and with the accurate inclination. The transcrestal sinus elevation procedure has become an important preprosthetic surgical procedure for bone creation in the posterior maxilla prior to implant placement. OBJECTIVES: Clinical and radiographic evaluation of using ballooning technique for sinus lift simultaneous with implant placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted on fourteen patients who were divided into two groups. Patients, with limited bone height below the floor of the maxillary sinus, were selected on the basis of history, clinical and radiographic examination using cone beam computed tomography. In group A, elevation of sinus membrane using ballooning technique without graft material and implants were placed simultaneously. While in group B, after sinus membrane elevation using ballooning technique, augmentation using biphasic calcium phosphate simultaneously with the implant placement were done. The bone density was measured in Hounsfield unit using ondemand3d software of the cone beam computed tomography. Also, the bone height was measured using cone beam computed tomography. RESULTS: Successful sinus membrane balloon lifting procedures were performed in 14 cases; in both groups there was no sinus membrane perforation. A total of 14 implants were placed. The radiographic examination showed the mean elevated height after 6 months by balloon in group A was 10.43 with SD ±1. 56mm.while in group B was10.31 ± 1.86. CONCLUSIONS: The use of balloon technique to elevate the sinus membrane is a minimally invasive technique and is associated with very little discomfort and complication. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Transcrestal Sinus lift; balloon; Implant; tenting-pole; Biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) | ||
| References | ||
|
1. Calandriello R, Tomatis M. Simplified treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla via immediate/early function and tilted implants: a prospective 1-year clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7: S1-12. 2. Rapani M, Rapani C. Sinus floor lift and simultaneous implant placement: A retrospective evaluation of implant success rate. Indian J Dent 2012; 3: 132-8. 3. Summers RB. The osteotome technique: Part 3—less invasive methods of elevating the sinus floor. Compendium.1994; 15: 698,700,702; 694 passim; quiz 710. 4. MischCE.Maxillarysinusaugmentationfortheendosteal implants: organized alternative treatment plans. Int J Oral Implantol 1987; 4: 49-58. 5. XuH,ShimizuY,OoyaK.Histomorphometricstudyofthe stability of newly formed bone after elevation of the floor of the maxillary sinus. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 43: 493-9. 6. Almasri M, Altalibi M. Efficacy of reconstruction of alveolar bone using an alloplastic hydroxyapatite tricalcium phosphate graft under biodegradable chambers. Br J Oral MaxillofacSurg 2011; 49: 469-73. 7. Chang JD, Bird SR, Bohidar NR, King T. Analgesic efficacy of rofecoxib compared with codeine/ acetaminophen using a model of acute dental pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral RadiolEndod 2005; 100: 74- 80. 8. Gabka J, Matsumara T. Measuring techniques and clinical testing of an anti-inflammatory agent (tantum). Munch Med Wochenschr 1971; 113: 198-203. 9. Steflik D, Koth DL, Robinson F, McKinney R, Davis B, Morris C, et al. Prospective investigation of the single- crystal sapphire endosteal dental implant in humans: Ten- year results. J Oral Implantol 1995; 21: 8-18. 10.Glavind L, Löe H. Errors in the clinical assessment of periodontal destruction. J Periodont Res 1967; 2: 180-4. 11.Muhleman HR. Psychological and chemical mediators of gingival health. J Prev Dent 1977; 4: 6-15. 12.Nedir R, Bischof M, Vazquez L, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP. Osteotome sinus floor elevation without grafting material: A 1-year prospective pilot study with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 679-86. 13. Fermergard R, Astrand P. Osteotome sinus floor elevation and simultaneous placement of implants–a 1-year retrospective study with Astra Tech implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008; 10: 62-9. 14.Nedir R, Nurdin N, Vazquez L, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bischof M, Bernard JP. Osteotome sinus floor elevation technique without grafting: a 5-year prospective study. J ClinPeriodontol 2010; 37: 1023-8. 15. Palma VC, Magro-Filho O, Oliveira JA, Lundgren S, Salata LA, Sennerby L. Bone reformation and implant integration following maxillary sinus membrane elevation: an experimental study in primates. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006; 8: 11-24. 16. Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL. Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 569-77. 17.Torretta S, Mantovani M, Testori T, Cappadona M, Pignataro L. Importance of ENT assessment in stratifying candidates for sinus floor elevation: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 57-62. 18. Soltan M, Smiler DG. Antral membrane balloon elevation. J Oral Implantol. 2005; 31(2): 85-90. 19. Zitzmann NU, Schärer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla.Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998; 85:8–17. 20. Hu X, Lin Y, Metzmacher A-R, ZhangY. Sinus membrane lift using a water balloon followed by bone grafting and implant placement: a 28-case report. Int JProsthodont. 2009; 22(3): 243–7. 21. Mazor Z. The use of minimally invasive antral membrane ballon elevation(MIAMBE) to treat the posterior maxilla:A clinical presentation. J Implant ReconstrDent. 2012; 2(1): 26-31. 22. Sani E, Veltri M, Cagidiaco MC, Balleri P, Ferrari M. Sinus membrane elevation in combination with placement of blasted implants: A 3-year case report of sinus augmentation without grafting material. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 37:966– 23. Schmitt A, Zarb GA. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants for single tooth replacement. Int J Prosthodont. 1993; 6:197–202. 24. Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: An objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 79-84. 25.Sogo M, Ikebe K, Yang TC, Wada M, Maeda Y. Assessment of bone density in the posterior maxilla based on Hounsfield units to enhance the initial stability of implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14: e183-7. 26. Sohn DS, Lee JS, Ahn MR, et al. New bone formation in the maxillary sinus without bone grafts. Implant Dent 2008; 17:321-331. 27.Jurisic M, Markovic A, Radulovic M, Brkovic BM, Sándor GK. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: Comparing osteotome with lateral window immediate and delayed implant placements. An interim report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 106:820–7 | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 270 PDF Download: 1,435 |
||
