CLINICAL AND CYTOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURE FABRICATED BY SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING ADDITIVE PROTOTYPING TECHNIQUE | ||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||
| Article 8, Volume 41, Issue 1, April 2016, Pages 42-49 PDF (842.51 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2016.59171 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Ahmed Mohamed F* ; Abbas Faten S* ; Omar Samia S* | ||
| B.D.S. Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt | ||
| Abstract | ||
| INTRODUCTION: Recent researches have shown that, in principle, computer-assisted design, computer-assisted manufacture and rapid prototype technologies (CAD/CAM/RP) can be successfully applied to the fabrication of removable partial denture (RPD) alloy frameworks and replace laboratory crafting techniques. The CAD/CAM techniques have been widely used for a long time to manufacture dental prostheses. Selective laser sintering (SLS), as an additive manufacturing (AM) method, is a new rapid prototyping technology which can be applied in the manufacturing of dental prosthesis based on layer-wise material addition. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical efficiency of cobalt–chromium removable partial denture framework fabricated using CAD/Selective Laser Sintering technology clinically and cytologically. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To carry out this study, six maxillary partially edentulous patients (class III modification 1. According to Kennedy classification) were selected from those attending the prosthodontics department, faculty of dentistry, Alexandria University. For each patient a cobalt chromium removable partial denture framework was fabricated using CAD/SLS technique then it was tried in and teeth were added, casted and inserted. Plaque index, gingival index, peridontal probing depth and clinical attachment level were evaluated and recorded for all patients at time of insertion, after 3 months and 6 months of follow up periods. RESULTS: all removable partial dentures showed minimum plaque accumulation, no signs of gingival tissue inflammation, and no significance changes of periodontal probing depth and no significance of attachment loss of the peridontium. CONCLUSION: all patients were satisfied with their dentures which fabricated by the computer aided design-computer aided manufacturing -rapid prototyping laser sintering technique (CAD/CAM/SLS) showing good oral environment response. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Removable Partial Denture; CAD-CAM/SLS; EOS system; Chrome-Cobalt SP2 powder; tissue response | ||
| References | ||
|
1. Abbas A, Nikzad S. The evaluation of rapid prototyping in dentistry: a review. Rapid Prototyping J 2009; 15: 216-25.
2. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009; 28: 44-56.
3. Williams RJ, Bibb R, Eggbeer D, Collis J. Use of CAD/CAM technology to fabricate a removable partial denture framework. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 96-9.
4. Hughes CW, Page K, Bibb R, Taylor J, Revington P. The custom-made titanium orbital floor prosthesis in reconstruction for orbital floor fractures. Br Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 41: 50-3.
5. Kanazawa M, Inokoshi M, Minakuchi S, Ohbayashi N. Trial of a CAD/CAM system for fabricating complete dentures. Dent Mater J 2011; 30: 93-6.
6. Rantanen T, Eerikanien E. Accuracy of the palatal plate of removable partial dentures, and influence of laboratory handling of the investement on accuracy. Dent Mater 1986; 2: 28-31.
7. Firtell DN, Muncheryon AM, Green AJ. Laboratory accuracy in casting removable partial denture frameworks. Prothet Dent 1985; 54: 856-62.
8. Barsby MJ, Schward WD. The qualitative assessment of Cobalt-Chromium Casting for partial dentures. Br Dent J 1989; 166: 211-6.
9. Romero GG, Engelmeier R, Powers JM, Canterbury AA. Accuracy of three corrective techniques for implant bar fabrication. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 84: 602-7.
10. Gao B, Wu J, Zhao X, Tan H. Fabricating titanium denture base plate by laser rapid forming. Rapid Prototyping J 2009; 15: 133-6.
11. Pupo Y, Delgado J, Sereno L, Ciurana J. Scanning space analysis in Selective Laser Melting for CoCrmo powder. Procedia Eng 2013; 63: 370-8.
12. Eggbeer D, Bibb R, Williams R. The computer-aided design and rapid prototyping fabrication of removable partial denture frameworks. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2005; 219: 195-202.
13. Martinez E, Amato K, Hernandez J, Ramirez DA, Wicker RB. Fabrication of metal and alloy components by additive manufacturing: examples of 3D materials science. J Mater Res Technol 2012; 1: 24-54.
14. Silness J, Loe H. Peridontal diseases in pregnancy. Acta Odonta Scand 1964; 22: 121-35.
15. Loe H, Silness J. Peridontal disease in pregnancy I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odonta Scand 1963; 21: 522-51.
16. Glavind L, Loe H. Errors in the clinical assessment of periodontal destruction. J Peridont Res 1967; 2: 180- 8.
17. Drury RA, Wallington EA. Carltons Histological technique. 5th ed. New York, USA: Ch Oxford University Press; 1980. p 335.
18. Kotz S, Balakrishnan N, Read CB, Vidakovic B. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. 2nd ed. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Interscience; 2006.
19. Diwan R, Talic Y, Omar N, Sadig W. The effect of storage time of removable partial denture wax pattern on the accuracy of fit of the cast framework. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77: 375-81.
20. Mayank A, Agrawal S, Agrawal S. Effects of systemic diseases on oral health. 2014; 3: 5-10. Available at: www. journalofdentofacialsciences.com
21. Preshaw PM, Walls AW, Jakubovics NS, Moynihan PJ, Jepson NJ, Loewy Z. Association of removable partial denture use with oral and systemic health. J Dent 2011; 39: 711-9.
22. Frank RP, Brudvik JS, Leroux B, Milgrom P, Hawkins N. Relationship between the standards of removable partial denture construction, clinical acceptability, and patient satisfaction J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 521-7.
23. Hummel SK, Wilson MA, Marker VA, Nunn ME. Quality of removable partial dentures worn by the adult U.S. population. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 37- 43.
24. MacKntee M I. Measuring the impact of oral health in old age: a qualitative reaction to some quantitative views. Gerodontology 1996; 13: 76-81.
25. EOS, 2013. EOS system data sheet EOS P 396. Available at: http://www.eos.info/systems_solutions/plastic/system s_equipment/eos_p_396.
26. Elmougy AH. Evaluation of metallic removable partial denture framework fabricated by two different prototyping techniques. M.Sc. Thesis. Department of Removable Prothodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University. 2015.
27. Williams R, Bibb R, Rafik T. A technique for fabricating patterns for removable partial denture frameworks using digitized casts and electronic surveying. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 91: 85-8.
28. Jevremovic DP, Puskar TM, Budak I, Vukelic D, Kojic V, Eggbeer D, Williams RJ. An RE/RM approach to thedesign and manufacture of removable partial dentures with a biocompatibility analysis of the F75 Co-Cr SLM alloy. Mater Tehnol 2012; 46: 123-9.
29. Fouad SA, Clinical and radiographic evaluation of residual ridge resorption under rigid and flexible immediate dentures. M.Sc. Thesis. Department of Removable Prothodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University. 2012.
30. Ardelean L, Bortun C, Podariu AC, Rusu LC. Some alternatives for classic thermopolymerisable acrylic dentures. Material Plastice 2012; 49: 30-3.
31. Bergman B, Hugoson A, Olsson CO. Caries, peridontal and prosthetic finding in patients with removable partial dentures: a six years longitudinal study. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48: 506-14.
32. Yousof Z-Isa Z. Peridontal status of teeth in contact with denture in removable partial denture wearers. J Oral Rehabil 1994; 21: 77-86.
33. Chandler JA, Brudrik JS. Clinical evaluation of patients eight to nine years after placement of removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 736-43.
34. Watson IB, Mac Donald RD. Oral mucosa and complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 47: 133-40.
35. Murr LE, Quinones SA, Gaytan SM, Lopez MI, Rodela A, Martinez EY, et al. Microstructure and mechanical behavior of Ti-6A1-4V produced by rapid-layer manufacturing, for biomedical applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2009; 2: 20-32.
36. Rekaby E, Metwaly A. Biological evaluation of abutment teeth for a new laser designed and finished RPD framework. Cairo Dent J 2012; 28: 1099-106.
37. Garant PR. Oral cells and tissues. London: Quintenence Books, 2003.
38. Nancy, A .Ten Cate, A. R. 2013 Oral histology development, structure and function. 8th ed. St Louis: Mosby Company.
39. Markov NJ. Cytologic study of keratinization under complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1968; 20: 8-13.
40. Jani RM, Bhargava KA. Histologic comparison of mucosa before and after wearing complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1976; 36: 254-60. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 465 PDF Download: 1,483 |
||
