Dawlat M. | ||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||
| Article 13, Volume 41, Issue 2, August 2016, Pages 194-198 PDF (528.84 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2016.59280 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Al-Hasani Mazen M.* ; Hanno Azza G.* ; Dowidar Karin M.* ; Mostafa Osama N.* ; Soliman Sobhi A.* | ||
| Bachelor of Dental Surgery, University of Science and Technology, Yemen | ||
| Abstract | ||
| INTRODUCTION: The greatest preventive challenge in dentistry is the control of dental biofilm and consequently avoiding dental caries and gingival diseases. As an adjunct to the mechanical oral hygiene measures, antibacterial agents seem to offer great benefits in the control of plaque formation and gingivitis, especially in high risk patients with orthodontic appliances. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of propolis mouthwash in children with fixed space maintainers regarding quantity of dental plaque and its microbial population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty children with space maintainers with an age range of 6 to 8 years were randomly assigned into 2 groups (test and control). The test group received the propolis mouthwash, and the controls received a placebo. All the patients were examined clinically to assess plaque accumulation using the plaque control record before and after the treatment. Plaque sampling and microbiological evaluation was used to estimate the numbers of colony forming units. RESULTS: Data showed that the controls experienced no significant reduction in microbial plaque count from baseline to the end of 3 weeks (P≤0.11) whereas in the propolis mouthwash users there was a significant difference after 3 weeks (P≤0.0001). Among groups comparison of total microbial plaque counts before intervention, showed a significant difference (P≤0.02), and after the intervention, there was no significant difference between groups (P≤0.72). No significant difference was found in plaque index scores in the controls from baseline to the end of 3 weeks (P≤0.15), whereas in the propolis group there was a highly significant difference (P≤0.0001). Comparisons of mean plaque values between test and control groups before intervention showed significant difference (P≤0.04). After intervention the difference increased dramatically to a highly significant value (P≤0.008). CONCLUSIONS: A mouthwash containing propolis significantly reduced bacterial count and plaque accumulation when used for 3 weeks. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Propolis; plaque; children; high risk; Antibacterial | ||
| References | ||
|
1. Dymock D. 4.2. Detection of microorganisms in dental plaque. In: Jass J, Surman S, Walker J, (eds), Medical biofilms John Wiley and Sons Ltd. 2003; 199-220.
2. Li J, Helmerhorst EJ, Leone CW, Troxler RF, Yaskell T, Haffajee AD, et al. Identification of early microbial colonizers in human dental biofilm. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97:1311-8.
3. Rozkiewicz D, Daniluk T, Zaremba ML, CylwikRokicka D, Luczaj-Cepowicz E, Milewska R, et al. Bacterial composition in the supragingival plaques of children with and without dental caries. Adv Med Sci. 2006;51:182-6.
4. Alanen P, Hurskainen K, Isokangas P, Pietilä I, Levänen J, Saarni UM, et al. Clinician's ability to identify caries risk subjects. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994;22:86-9.
5. Roeters J, Burgersdijk R, Truin GJ, van 't Hof M. Dental caries and its determinants in 2-to-5-year-old children. ASDC J Dent Child. 1995;62:401-8.
6. Albandar JM. Global risk factors and risk indicators for periodontal diseases. Periodontology 2000. 2002;29:177-206.
7. Arikan F, Eronat N, Candan Ü, Boyacio lu H. Periodontal conditions associated with space maintainers following two different dental health education techniques. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2007;31:229- 34.
8. Bader JD, Rozier G, Harris R, Lohr KN. Dental caries prevention: the physician's role in child oral health systematic evidence review. 2004.
9. Van Winkelhoff AJ, Herrera D, Oteo A, Sanz M. Antimicrobial profiles of periodontal pathogens isolated from periodontitis patients in The Netherlands and Spain. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32:893-8.
10. Matesanz‐Pérez P, García‐Gargallo M, Figuero E, Bascones‐Martínez A, Sanz M, Herrera D. A systematic review on the effects of local antimicrobials as adjuncts to subgingival debridement, compared with subgingival debridement alone, in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40:227-41.
11. Marsh PD. Are dental diseases examples of ecological catastrophes? Microbiology. 2003;149:279-94.
12. Duarte S, Koo H, Bowen WH, Hayacibara MF, Cury JA, Ikegaki M, et al. Effect of a novel type of propolis and its chemical fractions on glucosyltransferases and on growth and adherence of mutans streptococci. Biol Pharm Bull. 2003;26:527-31.
13. Skaba D, Morawiec T, Tanasiewicz M, Mertas A, Bobela E, Szliszka E, et al. Influence of the toothpaste with brazilian ethanol extract propolis on the oral cavity health. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013; 2013: 215391.
14. Koo H, Rosalen PL, Cury JA, Park YK, Bowen WH. Effects of compounds found in propolis on Streptococcus mutans growth and on glucosyltransferase activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:1302-9.
15. Kumar R, Kapoor DN, Jain A, Saimbi CS, Sharma VP, Tandon P. Microbicidal Effect of Different Mouthwasheson Patients Undergoing Fixed OrthodonticTreatmnent. The J Indian Orthod Soc. 2006;39:139-46.
16. Frankl SN, Shiere FR, Fogels HR. Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory. J Dent Child. 1962;29:150-63.
17. DenBesten P, Ko HS. Fluoride levels in whole saliva of preschool children after brushing with 0.25 g (pea-sized) as compared to 1.0 g (full-brush) of a fluoride dentifrice. Pediatr Dent. 1996;18:277-80.
18. O'Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol. 1972;43:38.
19. Sengun A, Sari Z, Ramoglu SI, Malkoç S, Duran I. Evaluation of the dental plaque pH recovery effect of a xylitol lozenge on patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:240-4.
20. de Carvalho FG, Silva DS, Hebling J, Spolidorio LC, Spolidorio DMP. Presence of mutans streptococci and Candida spp. in dental plaque/dentine of carious teeth and early childhood caries. Arch Oral Biol. 2006;11:1024-8.
21. Huser MC, Baehni PC, Lang R. Effects of orthodontic bands on microbiologic and clinical parameters. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;97:213-8.
22.Russell FM, Biribo SSN, Selvaraj G, Oppedisano F, Warren S, Seduadua A, et al. As a bacterial culture medium, citrated sheep blood agar is a practical alternative to citrated human blood agar in laboratories of developing countries. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:3346-51.
23. Kidd EA. Role of chlorhexidine in the management of dental caries. Int Dent J. 1991;41:279-86.
24.Rathod S, Brahmankar R, Kolte A. Propolis. A natural remedy. Indian J Dent Res Review. 2011;50-2.
25. Arikan V, Kizilci E, Ozalp N, Ozcelik B. Effects of Fixed and Removable Space Maintainers on Plaque Accumulation, Periodontal Health, Candidal and Enterococcus Faecalis Carriage. Med Princ Pract. 2015;24:311-7.
26. Seow WK, Cheng E, Wan V. Effects of oral health education and tooth-brushing on mutans streptococci infection in young children. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25:223- 8.
27. Hegde KS, Bhat SS, Rao A, Sain S. Effect of Propolis on Streptococcus mutans Counts: An in vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;6:22-5.
28. Pereira EMR, da Silva JLDC, Silva FF, De Luca MP, Lorentz TCM, Santos VR. Clinical evidence of the efficacy of a mouthwash containing propolis for the control of plaque and gingivitis: a phase II study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:750249.
29. Murray MC, Worthington HV, Blinkhorn AS. A study to investigate the effect of a propolis‐containing mouthrinse on the inhibition of de novo plaque formation. J Clin Periodontol. 1997;24:796-8. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 132 PDF Download: 459 |
||
