Organogenesis of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cv. Sandra and Rocky by Hypocotyl, Cotyledon and Leaf Explants | ||
| المجلة العربية للعلوم الزراعية | ||
| Article 2, Volume 3, Issue 5, January 2020, Pages 31-54 PDF (659.43 K) | ||
| Document Type: المقالة الأصلية | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/asajs.2020.67988 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Gharbia Hormiz Danial; Diaa Ayoub Ibrahim | ||
| Scientific Research Center (SRC), College of Science, University of Duhok, Duhok, IRAQ | ||
| Abstract | ||
| In vitro regeneration protocols were established for two Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cultivars (Sandra and Rocky) grown in Kurdistan region using hypocotyl, cotyledonous leaves and leaf explants. The explants excised from 12-15 days old of in vitro plantlets cultured on MS medium supplemented with different concentrations and combinations of plant growth regulators. High organogenesis percentage (100%) was achieved from hypocotyl grown in MS medium augmented with 1.0mgl-1 BA+ 0.5mgl-1 kinetin, which record approximately 3.75 in Sandra and 4.09 in Rocky cultivar as average number of shoots produced from each explant. While the highest organogenesis percentage (100%) was formed from cotyledon leaves using 1.5 mgl-1 BA+0.5mgl-1 kinetin that gave around 3.5 in Sandra cultivar as average number of shoots / explant. In contrast, the highest organogenesis was found on MS medium supplemented with 2.0mgl-1 BA+1.0 mgl-1 kinetin and the average number of shoots produced from each explant were approximately 3.17 in Rocky cultivar. The results of combination between 5.0mgl-1 BA with (0.0, 0.2, 0.5 and 1.0)mgl-1 NAA, indicated that the highest organogenesis percentage was recorded from hypocotyl (91.67 % with 6.5 shoots/explant and 66.67% with 4.0 shoots/ explant) in Sandra and Rocky cultivars respectively grown on MS medium supplemented with 5.0 mgl-1 BA alone. While the highest organogenesis percentage (100%) was induced from cotyledonous leaves in both cultivars (3.67 shoots for Sandra and 3.08 for Rocky) on MS medium supplemented with 5.0mgl-1 BA +0.2mgl-1 NAA. Meanwhile, the highest organogenesis percentage was obtained from leaf explants for both cultivars on the combination of 1.0mgl-1 BA +0.5mgl-1 kinetin, (77.78% and 66.67%) in Sandra and Rocky cultivars respectively. The regenerated plants were successfully transplanted to the field for acclimatization | ||
| Keywords | ||
| sLycopersicon esculentum; micropropagation; Organogenesis; TDZ; kinetin | ||
| References | ||
|
Abu-El- Heba, G. A.; Hussein, G. M. and Abdalla, N. A. 2008. A rapid and efficient tomato regeneration and transformation system, Agriculture and Forestry Research, 58: 103-110. Evans, D. A. 1989. Somaclonal variation – genetic basis and breeding applications. Trends in Genetics 5(2):46–50. Frary, A. and Van Eck, J. 2005. Organogenesis from transformed tomato explants. Transgenic Plants: Methods and Protocols, pp.141-150. Gerszberg, A.; Hnatuszko- Konka, K.; Kowalczyk, T. and Kononowicz,A.K. 2016. Efficient In vitro callus induction and plant regeneration protocol for different Polish tomato cultivars.Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobo.,44(2):452-458. Gubis, J.; Lajchova, Z.; Farago, J. and Jurekova, Z. 2003. Effect of genotype and explant type on shoot regeneration in Tomato (Lycopersicom esculentum Mill.) in vitro. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed 39(1):9-14. Gubis, J.; Lajchova, Z.; Farago, J. and Jurekova, Z. 2004. Effect of growth regulators on shoot induction and plant regeneration in Tomato (Lycopersicom esculentum Mill.). Biologia Bratislava 59(3): 405-408. Hanur, V. S. and Krishnareddy, B. 2016. In vitro organogenesis in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) using kinetin. Adv. Plants Agric. Res 4(6):00158. Kalyani, B. G. and Rao, S. 2014. Zeatin induced direct plant regeneration from cotyledon explants of cultivated tomato (Lycopersicom esculentum Mill.). World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. ,3(7):1034-1040. Kauser, N.; Khan, S.; Mohammadi, A.; Ghareyazil,B.; Uliaie, E. D. and Darvishrohani, B. 2016. Agrobactrium mediated transformation and direct shoot regeneration in Iranian Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cultivar Falat-CH.Pak. J. Bot., 48(6): 2489-2498. Kole, C.; Michler, C.; Abbott, A. G.; Hall,T.C. 2010). "Transgenic Crop Plants" Volume 1 Principles and Development, Springer verlag Berline Heidelberg. Majoul, H., R. ; Lengliz, S.; Gharsallah chouchane, F.; Gorsane, H.; Fakhfakh and Marrakchi, M. 2007. Factors affecting tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) transformation frequency. Acta Hort. (ISHS) 758:43-51. Manawadu, I. ; Nilanthi, D. and Senanayake, S. 2014. Callus formation and organogenesis of Tomato (Lycopersicom esculentum Mill. Variety Thilina). Tropical Agriculture Research & Extension 17(2):86-94. Mohamed, A. A.; Ismail, M. R. and Rahman, M. H. 2010. In vitro response from cotyledon and hypocotyls explants in tomato by inducing 6- benzylaminopurine. African Journal of Biotechnology 9(30) 4802-4807. Mohammad, A. M. and Omer M. S. 1990. "Fundamental Aspects of Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture". Mosual university. Murashige, T. and F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15:473-479. Orozco-Cárdenas, ML, Garcia D, Narváez-Vásquez, J. 2014.Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Methods in Molecular biology, Agrobacterium Protocols edited by Kan Wang. Third Edition Volume 2, Humana Press. Totowa, New Jersey. In press. Rao, A. and Agarwal, S. 2000. Role of antioxidant lycopene in cancer and heart disease. J. Am. College Nutr. 19: 563-569. Rashid, R. and Bal, S. 2010. Effect of hormones on direct regeneration in hypocotyls explants of Tomato. Not. Sci. Biol. 2(1):70-73 Rashid, R.; Bhat. J.A.; Bhat, Z.A.; Dar, W. A. and Shafi, W. 2012. Callus formation and organogenesis of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Vegetos-An International Journal of Plant Research, 25(2):243-248. SarwarKhan, M.; Usman, M. and Ilyas Lilla, M. 2006. Facile plant regeneration from tomato leaves induced with spectinomycin. Pak. J. Bot.,38(4):947-952. SAS, SAS/ STAT User’s Guide for Personal Computers, Release 6.12. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA, 2001. Soundararajan, M. 2015. Induction of organogenesis in tomato callus (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. pkm-1) using plant growth promoters including triacontanol and antioxidants. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied life Sciences, 5(3): 81-87. Sutter EG.1996. General laboratory requirements, media and sterilization methods. In: Trigiano RN, Gray DJ (eds), Plant Tissue Culture Concepts and Laboratory Exercises. New York, USA: CRC Press. pp. 11-25 Wayase, U. R. and Shitole, M.G. 2014. Effect of plant growth regulators on organogenesis in Tomato (Lycopersicom esculentum Mill.) cv. Dhanashri. Int. J. Pure Appl. Sci. Technol., 20 (2):65-71.
| ||
|
Statistics Article View: 389 PDF Download: 334 |
||
