COLOR MASKING MEASUREMENT FOR CERAMIC COATING OF TITANIUM USED IN DENTAL IMPLANTS | ||
| Egyptian Dental Journal | ||
| Article 21, Volume 63, Issue 1 - January (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics), January 2017, Pages 881-890 PDF (285.76 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/edj.2017.75039 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Khaldoun Ajlouni1; Waleed Elshahawy2; Raed Ajlouni1; Abdelfattah Sadakah3 | ||
| 1Professor, Department of Restorative Science, Baylor College of Dentistry, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Dallas, TX. | ||
| 2Lecturer, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Egypt. | ||
| 3Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Statement of problem: The dark metal color showing through the periimplant soft tissue as a result of poor implant placement or thin gingiva and progressive bone resorption is a common problem in implant dentistry. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the color masking effect of porcelain applied on titanium used in fabricating the polished collar of tissue level implants to solve this problem. Material and Methods: Type 4 commercially pure titanium disks and five porcelain dentin shades (A2, A3, B2, C2, and D3) were used. Ten titanium disk specimens per porcelain shade were air abraded and ultrasonically cleaned. Porcelain was condensed directly on the specimens, then fired and finished (1200 grit SiC paper). The color (L*a*b* values) of the polished specimens were measured using reflective spectrophotometer. The specimens were then ground and polished in 0.1 mm increments. Color was measured and ΔE values were calculated at each increment until the thickness at which the color coordinates start to change. ΔE greater than 3.3 was considered as a significant color mismatch detectable by the human eye. The data (n=10) was statistically analyzed by ANOVA/Tukey test at the 95% confidence level (α = .05). Results: ΔE was less than 3.3 as long as the ceramic thickness was ≥ 0.5 mm for A2, A3, B2, and C2 shades. For D3, ΔE was less than 3.3 as long as the ceramic thickness was ≥ 0.4 mm. Conclusions: The minimum ceramic thickness required to block the underlying titanium color is 0.5 mm for all shades except D3 which only needs 0.4 mm ceramic thickness. L* decreased with thickness increase. Redness a* and yellowness b*increased with thickness increase. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 199 PDF Download: 163 |
||
