Cohesion and Cooperation in Autistic Children’s Discourse | ||
| مجلة البحث العلمي في الآداب | ||
| Article 21, Volume 20, العدد العشرون الجزء التاسع - Serial Number 9, December 2019, Pages 42-67 PDF (619.3 K) | ||
| Document Type: المقالة الأصلية | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/jssa.2019.75598 | ||
| Author | ||
| Dalia M. Hamed* | ||
| Lecturer of English Linguistics Faculty of Education - Tanta University, Egypt | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Autism Spectrum Disorder causes difficulties in interaction and communication, hence this study is an attempt to shed some light on autistic children’s discourse concerning the way they employ cohesive ties and show cooperation during conversation. This is a preliminary step to propose some suggestions that may help these children with their troubles and challenging conditions. Research method is based on an analysis of the autistic discourse regarding two points: children’s observance of the Cooperative Principle in conversation and their use of cohesive ties. Grice’s notion of The Cooperative Principle (1975) that governs conversational behaviors assume that conversation is a cooperative endeavor between interactants. Halliday and Hasan (1976) discuss the notion of cohesion in discourse and consider that any text should be unified by certain cohesive devices. This study approaches autistic children’s discourse from the two perspectives: cooperation and cohesion. It concludes that autistic children employ echolalia to implicate their acceptance of the activity presented, which is a cooperative act. It is concluded that using words relating to the same relevant topic is nearly the only cohesive device employed by autistic children. Research limitation has to do with conducting an analysis of a child’s discourse despite the child’s inability to communicate and his repetitive linguistic behaviors. The study may be practical in suggesting some directions to improve autistic children’s performance and social communication. Echolalia, for instance, may be considered as a positive act of cooperation, and be taken as a step to move forward and train the child to repeat and utter a comment or express his desire. Autistic children should be trained to use various cohesive devices, such as synonymy and antonymy. This paper tries to make better language activities related to autistic children. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Autism Spectrum Disorder; discourse; The Cooperative Principle; Cohesive Devices | ||
| References | ||
|
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-V. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. Cabley, P. (2001). The routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics. London & New York: Routledge Downes, W. (1998). Language and society. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation, in P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. New York: Academic Press. Hagan, K.D.P. (2017). Discourses in autism assessment and diagnosis. Available at https://oro.open.ac.uk/55623/1/Redacted%20Hagan%20PhD%20Thesis%20A utism%20Discourses%202017.pdf Halliday, M. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman. Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold. Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Pearson Educated Limited. Hasan, R. (1984). Coherence and cohesive harmony. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension: Cognition, language and the structure of prose (pp. 181-219). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Helland, W.E. & Helland, T. (2017). Emotional and behavioural needs in children with specific language impairment and in children with autism spectrum disorder: The importance of pragmatic language impairment. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hofmann, Th. R. (1993). Realms of meaning. An introduction to semantics. London & New York: Longman Loukusa, S., Makinen, L., Gauffin, S., Ebeling, H., and Leinonen, E. (2018). Assessing social-pragmatic inferencing skills in children with autism spectrum disorder. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992417300229 Lyons, J. (1996). Linguistic semantics. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lyons. J. (1983). Language meaning and context. London: Fontana. Cohesion and Cooperation in Autistic Children’s Discourse Journal of Scientific Research in Arts 9 (2019) - 67 - Maciejewska, E. (2019). Discourse analysis as a tool for uncovering strengths in communicative practices of autistic individuals. Available at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1461445619829237 Martin, J. R. (1992). English text. System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins McCarthy, M. (2001). Issues in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press. Rollins P. R. (1999). Pragmatic accomplishments and vocabulary development in pre-school children with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology: A Journal of Clinical Practice, 8, 85–94. Rollins, P. R., & Snow, C. E. (1998). Shared attention and grammatical development in typical children and children with autism. Journal of Child Language, 25(3), 653-673. Rollins, P. R., Wambacq, I., Dowell, D., Mathews, L., & Reese, P. B. (1998). An intervention technique for children with autistic spectrum disorder: Joint attentional routines. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31(2), 181-193. Tager- Flusberg, H., Paul, R, & Lord, C. (2005). Language and Communication in Autism. In Fred R. Volkmar Rhea Paul Ami Klin & Donald Cohen ( Ed.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders, Volume 1, Third Edition. John Wiley& Sons, Inc. Tager-Flusberg, H. &Anderson, N. (1991). The development of contingent discourse ability in autistic children. Available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb00353.x | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 316 PDF Download: 396 |
||
