Elbokle, N., Chehata, I., Sultan, O., Al moghazy, H., Hossam, A. (2018). Regeneration of Maxillary Cystic Bone Cavities grafted with MPM versus PRF (Comparative study). test, 64(Issue 2 - April (Oral Surgery)), 1083-1092. doi: 10.21608/edj.2018.76967
Nader Nabil Elbokle; Ingy Mohamed Chehata; Omnia Ibrahim Sultan; Hinar Hany Al moghazy; Ahmed Mohamed Hossam. "Regeneration of Maxillary Cystic Bone Cavities grafted with MPM versus PRF (Comparative study)". test, 64, Issue 2 - April (Oral Surgery), 2018, 1083-1092. doi: 10.21608/edj.2018.76967
Elbokle, N., Chehata, I., Sultan, O., Al moghazy, H., Hossam, A. (2018). 'Regeneration of Maxillary Cystic Bone Cavities grafted with MPM versus PRF (Comparative study)', test, 64(Issue 2 - April (Oral Surgery)), pp. 1083-1092. doi: 10.21608/edj.2018.76967
Elbokle, N., Chehata, I., Sultan, O., Al moghazy, H., Hossam, A. Regeneration of Maxillary Cystic Bone Cavities grafted with MPM versus PRF (Comparative study). test, 2018; 64(Issue 2 - April (Oral Surgery)): 1083-1092. doi: 10.21608/edj.2018.76967

Regeneration of Maxillary Cystic Bone Cavities grafted with MPM versus PRF (Comparative study)

Egyptian Dental Journal
Article 10, Volume 64, Issue 2 - April (Oral Surgery), April 2018, Pages 1083-1092    PDF (1.83 M)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2018.76967
Authors
Nader Nabil Elbokle1; Ingy Mohamed Chehata2; Omnia Ibrahim Sultan2; Hinar Hany Al moghazy3; Ahmed Mohamed Hossam4
1Assistant Professor of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Faculty of Oral and Dental medicine, Cairo University, Egypt
2Lecturer of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. Faculty of Dentistry. October University of Modern Sciences and Art. Egypt
3Lectuer of Endodontics. Endodontic Department. Faculty of Dentistry. October University of Modern Sciences and Art. Egypt
4Lecturer of Radiology. Faculty of Dentistry October University of Modern Sciences and Art. Egypt
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of defect filling with mineralized Plasmatic matrix (MPM) versus Platelets Rich fibrin (PRF) after conservative intraosseous cystic lesions enucleation in maxillary bones.
Patients and methods: Twelve patients with large intra osseous maxillary cystic lesions were included in this study, all underwent conservative cyst enucleation. They were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group I the defect was filled with Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix (MPM), and group II the defect was filled with Platelets Rich Fibrin (PRF). Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at zero and 6 months postoperatively.
Results: A statistical significant decrease (p≤0.05) at cysts sizes was obvious at both groups at the follow up interval. When the groups were compared, Group I had statistically significant (p≤0.05) decrease at the cysts sizes than Group II at the follow up period.
Conclusion: MPM showed better values than PRF as a grafting material in defect filling after conservative cystic enucleation in maxillary bones.
Keywords
PRF; MPM; bone regeneration; growth factors; and platelet concentrates
Statistics
Article View: 265
PDF Download: 267