انعکاسات تطبيق الابتکار المفتوح على نقل المعرفة بين الجامعات والمؤسسات الصناعية: دراسة تحليلية The Impact of Applying Open innovation on Knowledge Transfer among Universities and Industrial Institutions: Analytic Study

عبد العزيز, خميس فهيم عبد الفتاح

doi:10.21608/jsrep.2019.78742

	انعکاسات تطبيق الابتکار المفتوح على نقل المعرفة بين الجامعات والمؤسسات الصناعية: دراسة تحليلية The Impact of Applying Open innovation on Knowledge Transfer among Universities and Industrial Institutions: Analytic Study
التربية (الأزهر): مجلة علمية محکمة للبحوث التربوية والنفسية والاجتماعية)
Article 7, Volume 38, 184ج2, October 2019, Pages 267-328 PDF (797.63 K)
Document Type: بحوث فی مجال أصول التربیة والتربیة الإسلامیة
DOI: 10.21608/jsrep.2019.78742
Author
خميس فهيم عبد الفتاح عبد العزيز
عضو هيئة تدريس بعمادة السنة الأولى المشترکة - جامعة أم القرى - مدرس بقسم أصول التربية- کلية التربية- جامعة دمنهور
Abstract
انطلاقا من أهمية النظر إلى الجامعات على أنها کيانات منتجة للمعرفة يمکنها أن تلعب دورًا بارزًا في دفع عمليات الابتکار والتنمية الاقتصادية في المجتمع من خلال توفير المعرفة التي تحتاجها المؤسسات الصناعية، وتأکيدا على أهمية الدور الذي يقوم به الابتکار المفتوح في تطوير القدرات الريادية لکل من الجامعات والمؤسسات الصناعية وتحسين نقل المعرفة بينهما، هدفت الدراسة الحالية إلى تحديد المتطلبات اللازمة للإفادة من تطبيق الابتکار المفتوح في تحسين نقل المعرفة بين الجامعات المصرية والمؤسسات الصناعية. واعتمدت الدراسة على المنهج الوصفي لتحقيق هذا الهدف. وتضمنت المتطلبات التي حددتها الدراسة الحالية للإفادة من تطبيق الابتکار المفتوح في تحسين نقل المعرفة بين الجامعات والمؤسسات الصناعية؛ أولا: متطلبات بناء الثقة وتعزيز التعاون والفهم المتبادل، ثانيا: متطلبات تعزيز دور الشبکات والهياکل کوسيط لنقل المعرفة، ثالثا: متطلبات تحسين القدرة الاستيعابية للمعرفة، رابعا: متطلبات دعم مجتمعات الممارسة، خامسا: متطلبات التبادل والتشارک المستمر للمعرفة، سادسا: متطلبات التقييم المتوازن لنقل المعرفة بين الجامعات والمؤسسات الصناعية. Based on the idea that universities are knowledge-productive entities that plays an outstanding role in enhancing innovation and economic development through providing industrial institutions with needed knowledge. Also, based on the importance of the role of open innovation in developing entrepreneurial abilities of both universities and industrial institutions and improving knowledge transfer among them, the present study aims at identifying the needed requirements for benefiting from applying open innovation in improving knowledge transfer among Egyptian universities and industrial institutions. The study employed the descriptive methodology to achieve this aim. The study found out that these requirements are: First, requirements of building trust and enhancing cooperation and mutual understanding. Second, requirements for supporting the role of networks and organizational bodies as a means for knowledge transfer. Third, requirements for enhancing the Absorptive Capacity of knowledge. Fourth, requirements for supporting communities of practice. Fifth, requirements for continuous knowledge transfer and sharing. Sixth, requirements for balanced evaluation of knowledge transfer among universities and industrial institutions.
Keywords
الابتکار المفتوح; نقل المعرفة; الجامعات; المؤسسات الصناعية. open innovation؛ knowledge transfer؛ universities؛ industrial institutions

References
1- المراجع العربية: -الحافظ، علی عبد الستار (2011). دور عملیات نقل المعرفة فی تقلیل فجوة المعرفة: دراسة استطلاعیة لآراء الأطباء فی بعض مستشفیات محافظة نینوی . مجلة تنمیة الرافدین . کلیة الإدارة والاقتصاد بجامعة الموصل ، 33 (104)، ص 171- 189. -السعید، عصام سید أحمد (2015). تفعیل التعاون بین الجامعة والصناعة فی ضوء النموذج الحلزونی الثلاثی . مجلة کلیة التربیة جامعة بورسعید، العدد 18، ص 178- 219 Triple Helix Model -الطوالبة، میرفت موسى (2016). درجة ممارسة عملیات نقل المعرفة فی وزارة التربیة والتعلیم الأردنیة ، ومدیریاتها ومقترحات للتطویر (رسالة دکتوراه غیر منشورة ) ، کلیة التربیة، جامعة الیرموک . - العزیزی، أحمد الرفاعی بهجت؛ وأحمد، عبد الله محمد شوقی؛وسلیم،حسن مصطفى حسن (2019م) . دورالتعلیم الجامعی فی بناء اقتصاد المعرفة فی المجتمع المصری: دراسة تحلیلیة . مجلة کلیة التربیة بالزقازیق . دراسات تربویة ونفسیة . العدد (102) ، الجزء الثانی، ص 333- 377 - شرف، صبحی شعبان، علی، أسماء فتحی السید (2019). مشارکة المعرفة بین أعضاء هیئة التدریس بجامعة المنوفیة وعلاقتها بالثقافة التنظیمیة السائدة لدیهم . مجلة کلیة التربیة جامعة المنوفیة ، 34 (2) . ص 2-59 . -غنیم، إبراهیم السید عیسى (2018) . فاعلیة البیئات التمکینیة لنقل المعرفة تجاه طلاب الجامعات. دراسات عربیة فی التربیة وعلم النفس، رابطة التربویین العرب ، المصریة تصورات وتوطینها . العدد (104)، ص 237- 266. - فؤاد، أحمد صبری (2016). إطار مقترح لتطبیق منهجیة الابتکار المفتوح لتحسین أداء إدارات البحوث والتطویر: دراسة میدانیة على شرکات تصنیع الدواء والکیماویات فی مصر( رسالة ماجستیر غیر منشورة)، کلیة التجارة جامعة عین شمس .. - محمد، ثناء هاشم (2019). دور جامعة الفیوم فی تحقیق متطلبات مجتمع المعرفة من وجهة نظر بعض الخبراء، المجلة التربویة، کلیة التربیة،جامعة سوهاج، العدد 59 ، ص 103- 169 الثقافة من - محمد، فاطمة زکریا (2010). تطویر إدارة المعرفة بالجامعات المصریة على ضوء خبرات بعض الدول، مجلة الثقافة والتنمیة، جمعیة أجل التنمیة، العدد35 ، ص 86- 151. - مکی، حمدی محمد نور (2016). إطار مقترح لتطبیق منهجیة الابتکار المفتوح کأداة لتحقیق التمیز: دراسة میدانیة على الجامعات المصریة ( رسالة ماجستیر غیر منشورة )، کلیة التجارة، جامعة عین شمس. -محمود، أشرف محمود أحمد؛ أحمد، محمد جاد حسین (2016). تحویل الجامعات المصریة إلى جامعات ریادیة فی ضوء الاستفادة من خبرات جامعتی کامبریدج وسنغافورة. مجلة التربیة المقارنة والدولیة. الجمعیة المصریة للتربیة المقارنة والإدارة التعلیمیة، العدد (6)، ص 317- 501 - محمود، ولاء محمود عبد الله (2018). تصور مقترح لتنمیة رأس المال الفکری بالجامعات المصریة فی ضوء مدخل إدارة المعرفة، مجلة کلیة التربیة ، جامعة بنها، 29 (116)، ص 1- 92. 2- المراجع العربية مترجمة: Translation of the Arabic References .-Hafiz, AA,,Sattar (2011). The role of knowledge transfer processes in reducing the knowledge gap: a survey of doctors' opinions in some hospitals in Ninewa Governorate. Al-Rafidain Development Journal. College of Business and Economics, University of Mosul, 33 (104), pp. 171-189. E , Essam, A , Ahmed (2015). Activating the cooperation between the university and the industry according to the three-spiral model. Port Said University College of Education Journal, Issue 18, p. Triple Helix Model 178-219 - Al-Tawalbervat Moussa (2016). The degree of practicing knowledge transfer processes in the Jordanian Ministry of Education and its directorates and proposals for development (unpublished PhD thesis), Faculty of Education, Yarmouk University Al-Azizi, A. A. B.; Ahmed, A. M. S., and Salim, H. M. H. (2019). The role of university education in building a knowledge economy in the Egyptian society: an analytical study. Journal of the Faculty of Education in Zagazig. Educational and psychological studies. Issue (102), Part Two, pp. 333-377 Sharaf, S .S and Ali, A. F. A (2019). Knowledge sharing between faculty members at Menoufia University and its relationship to the prevailing organizational culture in them. Journal of the Faculty of Education, Menoufia University, 34 (2). Pp. 2-59 . - Ghanim, Ibrahim Al-Sayed Issa (2018). The effectiveness of enabling environments for knowledge transfer towards university students. Arab studies in education and psychology, the League of Arab Educators, Egyptian perceptions and their settlement. Issue (104), pp. 237-266. Fouad, A. S. (2016). A proposed framework for the application of the open innovation methodology to improve the performance of research and development departments: A field study on pharmaceutical and chemical manufacturing companies in Egypt (unpublished master's thesis), Faculty of Commerce, Ain Shams University. Muhammad, T. H. (2019). The role of Fayoum University in achieving the requirements of the knowledge society from the point of view of some experts, The Educational Journal, Faculty of Education, Sohag University, Issue 59, pp. 103-169 Culture from - Muhammad, F. Z. (2010). Development of knowledge management in Egyptian universities in light of the experiences of some countries, Journal of Culture and Development, Association for Development, Issue 35, pp. 86-151. - Makki, H.M.N.(2016). A proposed framework for applying the open innovation methodology as a tool to achieve excellence: a field study on Egyptian universities (unpublished master's thesis), Faculty of Commerce, Ain Shams University. Mahmoud, A.M. A ; Ahmed, M. G. H. (2016). Transforming Egyptian universities into pioneering universities in order to benefit from the expertise of the Universities of Cambridge and Singapore. Journal of Comparative and International Education. Egyptian Association for Comparative Education and Educational Administration, No. (6), pp. 317-501 Mahmoud, W. M. A. (2018). A proposed concept for the development of intellectual capital in Egyptian universities according to the Introduction to Knowledge Management, Journal of the Faculty of Education, Benha University, 29 (116), pp. 1-92. 3- المراجع الأجنبية: -Abdul Razak, A, Murray, A& Roberts, D (2014). Open Innovation in Universities: The Relationship Between Innovation and commercialization, Knowledge and Process Management, 21 (4), p260—269. - Agrawal, A. (2001). “University-to-Industry Knowledge Transfer: Literature Review and Unanswered Questions.” International Journal of Management Reviews , 3 (4) ,p 285–302. -Ankrah, S., & AL-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities-industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3),p 387–408. -Antonelli, C. (2008), “The new economics of the university: a knowledge governance approach”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 33 (1),p1-22. -Argote, L. and Ingram, P. (2000) Knowledge Transfer: a Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processing, 82, p150–169. -Battistella, C., and F. Nonino. (2013). “Exploring the Impact of Motivations on the Attraction of Innovation Roles in Open Innovation Web-based Platforms.” Production Planning & Control 24 (2–3). p226–245. -Becker, B.& Eube, C. (2018). Open innovation concept: integrating universities and business in digital age, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4,p 1-12. -Bercovitz, J. and Feldmann, M. (2006), “Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1) ,p175-188. -Bogers M (2011). The open innovation paradox: knowledge sharing and protection in R&D collaborations. European Journal of Innovation Management . 14(1).p 93–117. -Bonaccorsi, A. and Daraio, C. (2002), “The organization of science: size, agglomeration and age effects in scientiﬁc productivity”, presented at the SPRU Conference Rethinking Science Policy, York University, March 21-23. -Buganza, T. and Verganti, R. (2009), “Open innovation process to inbound knowledge collaboration with universities in four leading firms”, European Journal of Innovation Management, 12 (3) ,p306-325 -Bozeman, B. (2000), “Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory”, Research Policy, 29, p627-655. -Carayol, N. (2001), “Research agendas and science industry collaborations”, in Verdier, E. (Ed.), Higher Education Systems and Industrial Innovation, Final Report, July, TSER Programme, Directorate General Science, Research and Development, European Commission, Brussels. -Carayol, N. (2003), “Objectives, agreements and matching in science-industry collaborations: reassembling the pieces of the puzzle”, Research Policy, Vol. 32, p887-908. -Cesaroni, F., & Piccaluga, A. (2016). The activities of university knowledge transfer offices: Towards the third mission in Italy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4), p753–777. -Chaminade, C, & Edquist, C. (2010). Rationales for Public Policy Intervention in the Innovation Process: Systems of Innovation Approach. In R. Smits, S. Kuhlmann, & P. Shapira (Eds.), The theory and practice of innovation policy: an international research handbook (p95—114). -Chesbrough, H.W. (2003a), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Publishing, Cambridge, MA. -Chesbrough, H. (2003b), “The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual property”, California Management Review, 45 (3)p 33-58. -Chesbrough, H.W. (2003c), “The era of open innovation”, MIT Sloan Management Review, 44 (3),p 35-41. -Chesbrough, H. (2006), Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovative Landscape, Harvard Business School Publishing, Cambridge, MA. -Chesbrough, H.W. (2006b), “Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation”, in Chesbrough, H.W., Vanhverbeke, W. and West, J. (Eds), Open Innovation Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford, p1-15. -Chesbrough HW. (2007). Business model innovation: it’s not just about technology anymore. Strategy & Leadership ,35(6) ,p12–17. -Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), New frontiers in open innovation (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press. -Cohen, W. M., A. Goto, A. Nagata, R. R. Nelson, and J. P. Walsh. (2002). “R&D Spillovers, Patents and the Incentives to Innovate in Japan and the United States.” Research Policy, 31 (8), p1349–1367. -Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R. and Walsh, J. (2002), “Links and impacts: the inﬂuence of public research on industrial R&D”, Management Science, 48, p1-23. -de Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., Kalvet, T., & Chesbrough, H. (2008). Policies for open innovation. Theory, framework and cases. Retrieved from www.eurosfaire.prd.fr. -De Wit, J., B. Dankbaar, and G. Vissers. (2007). “Open Innovation: The New Way of Knowledge Transfer?” , Journal of Business Chemistry, 4 (1) ,p 11–19. -di Gregorio, D. and Shane, S. (2003), “Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?”, Research Policy, 32(2),p 209-28. -Elfenbein, D.W. (2007), “Publications, patents, and the market for university inventions”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63,p 688-715. -Evers, H.D. (2008), “Knowledge hubs and knowledge clusters: designing a knowledge architecture for development”, Working Paper Series 27, Department of Political and Cultural Change, Bonn. -Fabrizio, K.R. (2006), “The use of university research in firm innovation”, in Chesbrough, H.W., Vanhverbeke, W. and West, J. (Eds), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford, p134-161. -Fleming, L., King, C., & Juda, A. I. (2007). Small worlds and regional innovation. Organization Science, 18, p938–954. -Fontana, R., Geuna, A. and Matt, M. (2006), “Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: the importance of searching, screening and signalling”, Research Policy, 35, p 309-323. -Gassmann, & Enkel, E. (2006). Open Innovation. Organization. (3),p 132-139. -Gassmann, O., Enkel, E. and Chesbrough, H.W. (2010). “The future of open innovation”, R&D Management, 40 (3),p 213-221. -Goldsmith, S. and Eggers, W.D. (2004). Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector, The Brookings Institute, Washington DC. -Hoffman, K., Parejo, M., Bessant, J. and Perren, L. (1998), “Small ﬁrms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: a literature review”, Technovation,18 (1). p39-55. -Hall, B. H. (2004). Innovation and Diffusion. Cambridge, MA. National Bureau of Economic Research. -Howells, j.; Ramlogan, R; Cheng, S. (2012). Universities in an open innovation system: a UK perspective, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research.18(4),p 440-445. - Huggins, R., Prokopl, D. & Thompson, P. (2019). Universities and open innovation: the determinants of network centrality, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Available from https://link-springer-com.sdl.idm.oclc.org/article/10.1007/s10961-019-09720-5 -Jonsson, L., Baraldi, E., Larsson, L. E., Forsberg, P., & Severinsson, K. (2015). Targeting academic engagement in open innovation: Tools, effects and challenges for university management. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(3), p 522–550. -Johnston, L.; Robinson, S. & Lockett, N. (2010).Recognising “open innovation” in HEI-industry interaction for knowledge transfer and exchange, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour& Research, 16 (6),p 540-560. -Krogh, G., Nonaka, I. and Rechsteiner, L. (2012) Leadership in Organizational Knowledge Creation: a Review and Framework. Journal of Management Studies, 49, p240–277. -Knockaert, M., Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M. and Clarysse, B. (2011) The Relationship Between Knowledge, Top Management Team Composition, and Performance: the Case of Science-based Entreprenaurial Firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35 (4), p777–803. -KTP Best Practice. (2013). “A Best Practice Approach to Open Innovation.” Available from: http://www.ncub.co.uk/reports/knowledge-transferpartnerships-a-best-practice-approach-to-open-innovation.html Accessed 15 September 2019. -Kwiek, M. (2003) Academe in Transition: transformations in the Polish Academic Profession. Higher Education, 45,p 455–476. -Kwiek, M. (2008) Accessibility and Equity, Market Forces and Entrepreneurship: developments in Higher Education in Central and Eastern Europe. Higher Education Management and Policy, 20 (1),p 89–110. -Laursen, K. and Salter, A. (2004), “Searching low and high: what types of ﬁrms use universities as a source of innovation?”, Research Policy, 33,p 1201-1215. -Lawton Smith, H., & Bagchi-Sen, S. (2006). University–industry interactions: The case of the UK biotech industry. Industry and Innovation, 13(4),p 371–392. -Lawton Smith, H., Chapman, D., Wood, P., Barnes, T., & Romeo, S. (2014). Entrepreneurial academics and regional innovation systems: The case of spin-offs from London’s universities. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(2), p341–359. -Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of university–industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2), p111–133. -Lichtenthaler, U. (2011). “Open Innovation: Past Research, Current Debates, and Future Directions.” Academy of Management Perspectives, 25 (1), p 75–93. -Liefner, I. (2003), “Funding, resource allocation, and performance in higher education systems”, Higher Education, 46,p 469-89. -Link, A., Siegel, D.S. and Bozeman, B. (2007), “An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16 (4),p 641-55. -Manville, G; Karakas, F; Polkinghorne, M & Petford, N (2019). Supporting open innovation with the use of a balanced scorecard approach: a study on deep smarts and effective knowledge transfer to SMEs, Production Planning & Control, 30 (10-12),p 842-853. -Markman, A. B., ed. (2016). Open Innovation: Academic and Practical Perspectives on the Journey from Idea to Market. New York . Oxford University Press. -Meissner, D., & Kotsemir, M. (2016). Conceptualizing the innovation process towards the 'active innovation paradigm'-trends and outlook . Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship: JIE, 5(14),p 1-18. -Melese, T., Lin, S.M., Chang, J.L. and Cohen, N.H. (2009), “Open innovation networks between academia and industry: an imperative for breakthrough therapies”, Nature Medicine, 15 (5),p 502-507. -Meyer-Krahmer, F. and Schmoch, U. (1998), “Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four ﬁelds”, Research Policy, 27 (8),p835-52. -Mitton, C., Adair, C.E., McKenzie, E., Patten, S.B. and Waye-Perry, B. (2007), “Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature”, The Milbank Quarterly, 85 (4) ,p729-68. -Mohnen, P. and Hoareau, C. (2003), “What type of enterprise forges close links with universities and government labs? Evidence from CIS2”, Managerial and Decision Economics, 24,p 133-45. -Nesta, L. and Saviotti, P.P. (2005), “Coherence of the knowledge base and the ﬁrm’s innovative performance: evidence from the US pharmaceutical industry”, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 53 (1), p123-42. -Nielsen, C.; Cappelen, K.(2014). Exploring the Mechanisms of Knowledge Transfer in University-Industry Collaborations: A Study of Companies, Students and Researchers, Higher Education Quarterly, 68 (4),p 375–393 -Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York. Oxford University Press. -Nonaka, I. (2007) The Knowledge-creating Company. Harvard Business Review, 85, p162–171. -Nonaka, I. and Krogh, G. (2009) Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory. Organization Science, 20 (3), p 635–652. -Oxley, J.E. (1997), “Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: a transaction cost approach”, The Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 387, p. 409. -Perrin, A. and Rolland, N. (2007), “Mechanisms of intra-organisational knowledge transfer: the case of a Global Technology ﬁrm”, Management, 10 (2), p 25-47. -Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University—industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda . International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4),p 259-280. -Perkmann, M., King, Z., & Pavelin, S. (2011). Engaging excellence? Effects of faculty quality on university engagement with industry. Research Policy, 40(4),p 539-552. -Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A. , D'Este, P., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university—industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2),p 423-442. -Portilla, A. (2015). Which one goes well with? Exploring the link between theoretical perspectives and research contexts in Open Innovation research, 20th International Scientific Conference Economics and Management, P1034 - 1039. -Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P. and Finkelstein, S. (2005) Leveraging Intellect. Academy of Management Executive, 19 (4), p78–94. -Rasmussen, E., Moen, Ø. and Gulbrandsen, M. (2006) Initiatives to Promote Commercialization of University Knowledge. Technovation, 26, p 518–533. -Rherrad, I. (2009) Effect of Entrepreneurial Behaviour on Researchers’ Knowledge Production: evidence from Canadian Universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 63 (2), p 160–176. -Roach, J., and M. Polkinghorne, eds. (2007). Applications of Knowledge Transfer to Small and Medium Sized Businesses. UK. Bournemouth University. -Rossi, F. (2010). The governance of university-industry knowledge transfer, European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), p155-171. -Rossi, F., and A. Rosli, (2015). “Indicators of University–Industry Knowledge Transfer Performance and Their Implications for Universities: Evidence from the United Kingdom.” Studies in Higher Education. 40 (10) .p 1970–1991. -Rosli, A., & Rossi, F. (2016). Third-mission policy goals and incentives from performance-based funding: Are they aligned?. Research Evaluation, 25(4), p427–441. -Rothaermel, F.T. and Thursby, M.C. (2005), “University-incubator ﬁrm knowledge ﬂows: assessing their impact on incubator ﬁrm performance”, Research Policy, 34 (3) .p 305-20. -Santoro, M. D., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001). Relationship dynamics between university research centers and industrial firms: Their impact on technology transfer activities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1), 163–174. https ://doi.org/10.1023/A:10078 04816 426. -Savino, T., A. Messeni Petruzzelli, and V. Albino, (2015). “Search and Recombination Process to Innovate: A Review of the Empirical Evidence and a Research Agenda.” International Journal of Management Reviews, 19 (1), p54-75. -Schaeffer, V., Öcalan-Özel, S., & Pénin, J. (2018). The complementarities between formal and informal channels of university–industry knowledge transfer: A longitudinal approach. Journal of Technology Transfer. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1096 1-018-9674-4. -Shane, S. (2005). “Government Policies to Encourage Economic Development through Entrepreneurship: The Case of Technology Transfer.” In Economic Development through Entrepreneurship, edited by S. Shane, 33-46. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. -Sharifi, H., Liu, W., & Ismail, H. S. (2014). Higher education system and the ‘open’knowledge transfer: A view from perception of senior managers at university knowledge transfer offices. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), p 1860–1884. -Siegel, D.S., D. Waldman, and A. Link, (2003). “Assessing the Impact of Organisational Practices on the Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices: An Exploratory Study.” Research Policy ,32 (1).p 27–48. -Stringfellow, L. and Shaw, E. (2009), “Conceptualising entrepreneurial capital for a study of performance in small professional service ﬁrms”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 15 (2), p137-161. -Sun, P. Y.-T. and Scott, J. L. (2005) An Investigation of Barriers to Knowledge Transfer. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9 (2), p75–90. -Szulanski, G. (2000) The Process of Knowledge Transfer: a Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, p 9–27. -Thursby, J. G., R. Jensen, and M. C. Thursby, (2001). “Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major US Universities.” The Journal of Technology Transfer ,26 (1/2). 59–72. -WECD. (2015). “KTP Impact Report.” Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/467142/ KTP_Report_July_2015_Exec_summary__1-SEP-15_.pdf Accessed 1 September 2019. -Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). “Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualisation, and Extension.” Academy of Management Review, 27 (2).p185-203. -Trott, P., & Hartmann, D. (2009). Why “Open Innovation” is old wine in new bottles. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), p715-736.
Statistics Article View: 505 PDF Download: 2,329