INFLUENCE OF DEFICIT IRRIGATION AND PARTIAL DRY OF ROOT ZONE ON SQUASH CROP YIELD AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY | ||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||
| Article 6, Volume 35, Issue 4, October 2018, Pages 1271-1292 PDF (721.77 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2018.95275 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Abousrie A. Farag1; Mari Isabel Ferrarie2 | ||
| 1Lecturer at Department of Agricultural and Bio-systems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Benha University, Egypt. | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Agronomy, Lisbon University, Portugal. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The main objectives of this research were to study the effects of sustained deficit irrigation (SDI) and partial drying of root zone (PRD) on yield and water use efficiency of squash (Cucurbita Pepo, L. Oto) crop. To fulfill these purposes, a field study was conducted in the experimental farm of Faculty of Agriculture, at Moshthor, Benha University, Egypt, for the two successive seasons of late summer (2016 and 2017), under both drip surface (DSI) and subsurface irrigation (SSDI) systems. Five irrigation treatments were undertaken. The first (FI-100%) was corresponding to full crop water requirements (FWR), and soil water deficit was replenished to field capacity when 50% of the available water was exhausted, depending on root depth which was predicted by a root depth model. The second treatment was corresponding to 80% of the FWR (SDI-80%), the third one was corresponding to 70% of FWR (SDI-70%), the fourth one was corresponding to 70% of the FWR and partial drying of root zone (SDI-70%+PRD), and in the last treatment (SDI-50%), the crop was irrigated at 50% of full water requirement FWR. In the treatment (SDI-70%+PRD), the root zone was irrigated partially but from alternate laterals. The results show that surface drip irrigation (DSI) resulted in lower WUE and lower yield of squash than the sub-surface drip irrigation (SSDI), although with the subsurface drip irrigation system water consumption is less than with the surface drip irrigation by 5 %. The treatment (FI-100 %) resulted in both the highest WUE and squash yield either with surface or sub-surface. The treatment SDI-80% resulted in WUE and yield not significantly different from FI-100%. SDI-70%+PRD resulted in WUE and yield almost equal to those achieved with SDI-80%. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| subsurface drip irrigation; sustainable deficit irrigation; surface drip irrigation and nutrient use efficiency | ||
| References | ||
|
Allen, R. G. (1996). Assessing integrity of weather data for use in reference Evapotranspiration estimation. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. ASCE 122(2): 97‐106.
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration - Food and Agriculture Organization. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Amer, K. H. (2011). Effect of irrigation method and quantity on squash yield and quality. Agricultural Water Management, 98(8), 1197-1206.
Borg, H., and D.W. Grimes. 1986. Depth development of roots with time: An empirical description. Trans. ASAE 29:194–197
FAO. (2018.). AQUASTAT. Retrieved 3 12, 2018, from http://www.fao.org/NR/WATER/AQUASTAT/main/index.stm
FAOSTAT (2014). Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). http://faostat.fao.org
Ferreira, M. I. (2017). Stress coefficients for soil water balance combined with water stress indicators for irrigation scheduling of woody crops. Horticulturae 3 (2), 38; doi:10.3390/horticulturae3020038
Hess, M., Bill, M., Jason, S., John, S. (1997). Oregon State University Western Oregon Squash Irrigation Guide, vol. 541. Department of Bioresource Engineering, Corvallis, OR, pp. 737–6304.
Howell, T.A. (2001). Enhancing water use efficiency in irrigated agriculture. Agronomy Journal 93, 281–289.
Ibrahim, E., and Selim, E. (2010). Effect of irrigation intervals and antitranspirant (kaolin) on summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) growth, yield, quality and economics. J. Soil Sci. and Agric. Engineering, Mansoura Univ.., 1. 883-894.
Jones, H.G. (2004). What Is Water Use Efficiency? In: Bacon, M.A. (Ed.), Water Use Efficiency in Plant Biology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK, pp. 27–41
Kirda, C. (2002). Deficit Irrigation Scheduling Based on Plant Growth Stages Showing Water Stress Tolerance. Deficit Irrigation Practices. FAO Corp. Doc. Rep. 22, pp.–10 (Rome)
Klute, A. (1986). Methods of soil analysis. Part I. Physical and mineralogical methods. Second edition. Agronomy Series no. 9, ASA, Madison, Wis.
Köppen, W. (1936). Das geographische System der Klimate, in: Handbuch der Klimatologie, Band 1, Teil C., edited by: Köppen, W. and Geiger, R., Gebr. Borntraeger, Berlin, 1–44, 1936.
Masto, R. E., Chhonkar, P. K., Singh, D., and Patra, A. K. (2009). Changes in soil quality indicators under long-term sewage irrigation in a sub-tropical environment. Environmental Earth Sciences, 56(6), 1237-1243.
Page, A.L., Miller, R.H. and Keeney, D.R. (1982) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomy. In Soil Science Society of America, Vol. 1159.
Pereira, L.S., Oweis, T. and Zairi, A., (2002). Irrigation management under water scarcity. Agricultural Water Management 57, 170–206.
Plauborg, F., Andersen, M.N., Heidmann, T. and Olesen, J.E. (1996). Markvand: A decision support system for irrigation scheduling. Proc. Of the International conference on Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Scheduling. San Antonio, Texas 3-6 Nov. p. 527-535.
Rhoades, J.D., (1974). Drainage for salinity control. In: van Schilfgaarde, J. (Ed.), rainage for Agriculture. Agronomy Monograph No. 17. SSSA, Madison, WI, pp. 433–461.
Rolbiecki, R., Rolbiecki, S., Wichrowska, D., Wojdyla, T., Ptach, W., and Chmura, K. (2014). Effects of drip irrigation of summer squash cultivated on the light soil. Retrieved 8 17, 2017.
Savva, A. P. and Frenken K. (2002). Crop Water Requirements and Irrigation Scheduling. Irrigation Manual Module 4, FAO Sub-Regional Office for East and Southern Africa, Harare. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 245 PDF Download: 305 |
||
