EFFECTS OF SOIL CONDITIONER ON WATER CONTENT OF SANDY SOIL AND PEANUT PRODUCTION UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION RATES | ||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||
| Article 10, Volume 34, Issue 3, July 2017, Pages 1271-1296 PDF (1.33 M) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2017.97463 | ||
| Author | ||
| Kh. A. Allam | ||
| Senior Res., Agric. Eng. Res. Inst., Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Effects of soil conditioner on water content of sandy soil and peanut production under different irrigation rates were investigated during the two growing summer seasons of 2015 and 2016 at Abdel Moniem Reyad Village (Latitude 30°41'8" N, Longitude 30°18'0" E, and altitude of 7m above sea level), Al-Bustan area, El-Beheira Governorate, Egypt. Also, the validity of a simulation model to predict changes in soil moisture contents with time as well as moisture distribution within the soil profile was tested. Four soil conditioner levels (SC0: control, SC1: 1 ton/fed, SC2: 2 ton/fed, and SC3: 3 ton/fed), and three irrigation rates (full irrigation: 100% ETo, moderate deficit: 75% ETo and severe deficit: 50% ETo) were tested. Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) values were based on class A pan measurements. Peanut (Ismailia 2 cultivar) was used in the experiments. Results indicated that, the performance of the sprinkler irrigation system at the experimental site is considered acceptable. The additions of soil conditioner to the sandy soil led to decreasing the bulk density and saturated hydraulic conductivity values and increasing the saturated soil moisture contents, field capacity, welting point, available water, and air entry values. The tested simulation model proved to be accurate to predict changes in soil moisture contents with time as well as moisture distribution within the soil profile. Average seasonal values of applied irrigation water were 2986, 2240, and 1506 m3/fed for the 100, 75, and 50% ETo treatments, respectively. The tested treatments significantly affected peanut yield and yield components parameters tested under the experimental conditions. Applying amount of irrigation water equals to 100% ETo with 2 ton/fed of hydro-gel soil conditioner produced the highest pod yield of 1.83 and 1.89 ton/fed and straw yields of 1.33 and 1.32 ton/fed from the peanut crop grown in sandy soil. Results indicated also that, an average water productivity value of 0.65 kg pod/m3 and 0.43 kg straw/m3 can be achieved from the interaction between 100% ETo * SC2 treatment. The results indicated that, in sandy soils of poor water retentive capacity, high yields of peanut crop can be obtained with the application of 2-3 ton/fed soil conditioner and irrigating with amount of water equals to 100% ETo. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Peanut; soil conditioner; polymer; irrigation rate; water productivity | ||
| References | ||
|
Abdrabbo A. Abou Kheira, 2009. Macro-management of deficit-irrigated peanut with sprinkler irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 96 (2009) 1409–1420.
Allam; Kh. A., 2004. Simulation model of water movement in sandy soils under trickle irrigation conditions. Ph.D. Alex. Uni. Fac. of Agri. – Saba Basha: 32-50.
Al-Omran A M.; A. R. Al-harbi; M. A. Wahb-allah; M. Nadeem; and A. Al-eter., 2010. Impact of irrigation water quality, irrigation systems, irrigation rates and soil amendments on tomato production in sandy calcareous soil. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 34 (2010): 59-73
Andry H.; T. Yamamotoa; T. Iriea; S. Moritania; M. Inouea and H. Fujiyama., 2009 Water retention, hydraulic conductivity of hydrophilic polymers in sandy soil as affected by temperature and water quality. Journal of Hydrology 373 (2009) 177–183
ASAE standard. 1988. Procedure for sprinkler distribution testing for research proposes. ASAE stdd. 35th Ed., ASAE: 501-503.
Attia, M.M. and K.M. Hammad., 1999. Drip irrigation scheduling of peanut in sandy soils. Mansoura Univ. J. Ag. Sci. 24 (11): 7059-7069.
Badawi F.Sh.F., A.M.M. Biomy and A.H. Desoky, 2011. Peanut plant growth and yield as influenced by co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and some rhizo-microorganisms under sandy loam soil conditions. Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University. Annals of Agricultural Science (2011) 56, 17–25
Beheiry, G.; Gh. S.; Soilman, A.A.; Nadia, F.; El-Aasar and I.H.; El-Bagouri., 1997. Accumulation and residual effects of natural amendments on chemical properties of some desert soil under saline water irrigation. International Symposium of Salt Affected Soils, pp. 395-405.
Benami, I. and A. Ofen., 1984. Irrigation Engineering. Irrigation Engineering Publications (IESP), Haifa, Israel.
Bhardwaj, A.K.; I.; Shainberg, D.; Goldstein, D.N.; Warrington and G.J.; Levy., 2007. Water retention and hydraulic conductivity of cross-linked polyacrylamides in sandy soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 71, 406–412.
Brouwer, C.; K. Prins and M. Heibloem., 1989. Irrigation water management: irrigation scheduling. Training manual no. 4 chapter 3 FAO, Rome, Italy, 28-29.
Black, C. A.; D. D. Evans; L. E. Ensminger; J. L. White; F. E. Clark and R. C. Dinauer., 1985. Methods of soil analyses. Seven Printing. Amer. Soc. of Agro. Madison, Wisconsin USA. 425-455
Bogino, P.; E. Banchio; L. Rinaudi; G. Cerioni; C. Bonfiglio and W. Giordano., 2006. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) response to inoculation with Bradyrhizobium sp. In soils of Argentina. Ann. Appl. Biol. 148, 207–212.
Borg, H. and D. Grimes. 1986. Depth development of roots with time: an empirical description. Trans. ASAE 29, 194–197.
Bouranis D.L.; A. G. Theodoropoulus and J.B. Drossopoulus., 1995. Designing synthetic polymers as soil conditioners. Commune Soil Sci Plant Anal 26:1455–1480.
CoHort Software. 2005. Costat Statistical package (version 6.311), P.O.Box 1149, Berkeley, CA, 94701, USA.
Chatzoudis G. K. and F. Rigas., 1999. Soil salts reduce hydration of polymeric gels and affect moisture characteristics of soil. Commune Soil Sci Plant Anal 30:2465–2474
Doorenbos, J. and W. O. Pruitt., 1977. Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. FAO Irrig. Drain. Paper no: 24, FAO, Rome, Italy, p. 97-100.
Doorenbos, J. and A. H Kassam., 1986. Yield response to water. FAO Irrig. Drain. Paper no: 33, FAO, Rome, Italy, p. 97-100
Doorenbos, J. and W. O. Pruitt., (1992). Calculation of Crop Water Requirement. In CropWater Requirement. FAO of The United Nation, Rome, Italy, pp. 1–65.
El-Shafei A.; Kh. A. Allam and T. K. Zin El-Abedin., 2008. Heterogeneity analysis of sprinkler irrigation in peanut fields. Misr J. Ag. Eng., 25(1): 58- 86
El-Maghraby, S.E.; F.A.; Hashem and M.M.; Wassif., 1996. The use of sulphur and organic manure for controlling soil salinity pollution under high saline water irrigation. Egypt J. Soil Sci., 36, 269-288.
Günes T. 2007. Effect of polymer on seedlings survival and growth of transplanted tomato under water stress. Asian J Chem 19(4):3208–3214
Han, Y.G.; P.L. Yang; Y.P Luo; S.M. Ren; L.X. Zhang and L. Xu, 2010. Porosity change model for watered super absorbent polymer-treated soil. Environ. Earth Sci. 61, 1197–1205.
Keller, J. and R. D. Bliesner. 1990. Sprinkle and trickle irrigation, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, ISBN: 0-442-24645-5.
Khalifa, H.E.; A.M, El-Gindy; G.A. Sharaf and Kh. A. Allam. 2004. Simulation water movement in sandy soil under surface point- source emitter: I-Model development. . Misr J. Ag. Eng., 21(2) 341-361
Ismail, S. M. 2002. Design and Management of Field Irrigation System. (in Arabic) Monshaet Al-Maaref Alex., 1st Ed.: 167-168.
Leciejewski, P. 2009. The effect of hydrogel additives on the water retention curve of sandy soil from forest nursery in Julinek. J. Water Land Dev. No. 13a, 2009: 239–247
Lixia Y., Y. Yangb, Z. Chena, C. Guoc, and S. Li 2014. Influence of super absorbent polymer on soil water retention, seed germination and plant survivals for rocky slopes eco-engineering. Ecological Engineering 62 (2014) 27– 32
Molden D. 2003. A water-productivity framework for understanding and action.In: Kijne, J.W., Barker, R Molden, D. (Eds.), Water Productivity in Agriculture:Limits and Opportunities for Improvement. International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka, pp. 1–18.
Salem N., A. Khater, M.Y. Tayel, and M.A. Matyn, 1990. Effect of soil amendments, irrigation and seeding density on growth of peas and nutrient uptake. SOIL TECHNOLOGY vol. 3, p. 301-309
Simonne, E. H. and M. D. Dukes, 2010. Principles and practices of irrigation management for vegetables. University of Florida, Hort. Sci. Extension. pp 17-23.
USDA, (2016). Production Estimates and Crop Assessment Division, Foreign Agr. Service, Circular Series FAS, USDA, WAP 11-16, November 2016.
Vara Prasad P.V., V. G. Kakani and H. D. Upadhyaya., 2011. Growth and production of groundnut. Soils and plant growth and crop production vol II
Viero P.W.M.,, K.M. Little, and D.G. Oscroft., 2000. The effect of a soil amended hydrogel on the establishment of a Eucalyptus grandis x E. amaldulens is clone grown on the sandy soils of Zululand. Southern Afr For J 188:21–28
Viero P.W.M., K.E.A. Chiswell, J.M. Theron., 2002. The effect of a soil-amended hydrogel on the establishment of a Eucalyptus grandis clone on a sandy clay loam soil in Zululand during winter. Southern Afr For J 193:65–75
Wassif, M.M., S.E. El-Maghraby, and A.H. Frah, 1997. Application of soil amendments as management practices for sustainable productivity under irrigation with saline water. International Symposium of Salt Affected Soils., pp.328-333.
Xiaolin Y., Y. Chen, S. Pacenk, W. Gao, L, Maa, G. Wanga, P. Yan, P .Sui and S. T. Steenhuis, 2015. Effect of diversified crop rotations on groundwater levels and crop water productivity in the North China Plain. Journal of Hydrology 522 (2015) 428–438.
Yinhong K., S. Khan and X., Ma, 2009. Climate change impacts on crop yield, crop water productivity and food security – A review. Progress in Natural Science 19 (2009) 1665–1674.
Zohuriaan-M, M.J. and K., Kabiri, 2008. Superabsorbent polymer materials: a review. Iran. Polym. J. 17, 451–477. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 172 PDF Download: 253 |
||
