ALTERNATIVE FUEL CONSUMPTION MEASUREMENT DEVICE FOR MULTIPURPOSE FARM MACHINERY USE | ||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||
| Article 2, Volume 33, Issue 4, October 2016, Pages 1187-1206 PDF (1.24 M) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2016.97584 | ||
| Authors | ||
| A.M. Elsbaay1; R. A. Hegazy2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Agric. Eng. Dept., Faculty of Agric., Kafrelsheikh University, Egypt. | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Agric. Eng. Dept., Faculty of Agric., Kafrelsheikh University, Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Measuring fuel consumption of deferent farm machines is essential step and requires recommended level of accuracy. However, the majorities of methods which are being used now in Egypt are still inaccurate enough and depend more on unacceptable methods. So, in this study, the fuel consumption device was designed and built to measure the fuel consumed by farm machines also used in wide range of related applications. Major components of the designed fuel consumption device were turbine type flow sensors, electronic board and circuits, power source (common 12 volt battery available in agricultural vehicles), built-in storage memory, interfaces and display facilities, connecting wires and housing. Turbine flowmeters Vision 1000 sensors have been used to build the fuel consumption device which have very small flowrates of 0.05 - 2.5 l/min. Electronic board used in the study was a modified version of ATmega328 series chip. The pulses of the flow sensors are being converted into consumption and displayed Liquid crystal display (LCD) screen has been attached with multi capacity memory card and USB interface. The device has been calibrated with standard method of using volumetric flow rate recorded through precise device made for that purpose. 110 hp New Holland tractor and a 16 hp medium size engine have been used for tracing the accuracy and differences of using fuel consumption device at stationery mode. In field, the fuel consumption device attached to two different machines, a 58 hp Claas combine harvester tested on ground with no crop. Second farm machine was the New Holland tractor 110 hp running in field alone and loaded with disc plough, to show the differences appear during different conditions for more reliability for fuel measurement device. Results showed that for the tractor, there were acceptable linear relationships between real volumetric consumption of fuel flow and volume measured by the fuel flow device with 0.8 % differences between averages at full throttle, and 0.16 % differences between averages at lower throttle. For 16 hp engine tested in lab, the differences were higher and around 1.5 % and 2.4 % in case of running the engine at full throttle and lower throttle position respectively. For recording the tractor fuel consumption in field, increasing both forward speed and load equipped with it increased fuel consumption. Where, attaching disc plough to the tractor increased the fuel consumed by the engine by 20.75 % at low tractor speed and as appeared on device display screen. In high forward speed the amount of fuel recorded when the tractor operated with disc plough has increased by 26.45. For Claas combine harvester, data showed the significant differences of fuel consumed. Where, in low forward speed of combine harvester, amount of 6.22 l/h has been recorded, and 12.70 l/h has been consumed by combine engine but at high forward speed with standard divisions of 0.24 and 0.19 under high and low forward speed of the combine respectively. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Fuel consumption; turbine flow meter; farm machinery' engines; fuel flow rates | ||
| References | ||
|
Bedri, A. R A. and H A. S. Al-Hashem (2006). High Precision Instrumentation Package for Monitoring the Tractor Performance. Scientific Journal of King Faisal University: Basic and Applied Sciences 7, p: 95- 106.
Trani, M. L, B. Bossi, M. Gangolells, and M. Casals (2016). Predicting fuel energy consumption during earthworks. Journal of Cleaner Production 112, Part 5, 20: 3798–3809.
De Souza, E. G. and L. F. Milanez (1988). Indirect Evaluation of the Torque of Diesel Engines. Transactions of the ASAE 31, 1350–1354.
Domsch, H., D. P. Ehlert , A. S. Smrikarov and N.V. Bentscheva (1999). Fuel consumption measurement with agricultural machinery. Landtechnik 54, 278–279. European Space Agency (ESA) 2009. EGNOS: European geostationary
Fathollahzadeh, H., H. Mobli, A. Jafari, D. Mahdavinejhad, S.M.H. Tabatabaie (2011). Design and calibration of a fuel consumption measurement system for a diesel tractor. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Journal. Manuscript No.1408. Volume 13, Issue 2, p: 1:12. Grisso R., J. V. Perumpral, D. Vaughan, T. R Gary, R. Pitman (2010). Predicting Tractor Diesel Fuel Consumption. PUBLICATION 442-073. Communications and Marketing, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Petersburg. USA. P: 1-10.
Howard, C. N., M. F. Kocher, R.M. Hoy and E.E. Blankenship (2011). Testing Fuel Efficiency of Tractors with both Continuously Variable and Standard Geared Transmissions. ASABE Meeting Presentation, paper number: 1110971.
Jokiniemi1, T., H. Rossner and J. Ahokas (2012). Simple and cost effective method for fuel consumption measurements of agricultural machinery. Agronomy Research Biosystem Engineering, Special Issue 1, p: 97-107.
Kheiralla, A. F., A. Yahya, M. Zohadie, and W. Ishak (2007). Modelling of power and energy requirements for tillage implements operating in Serdang sandy clay loam, Malaysia. Soil & Tillage Research 78, 21–34.
LICO Electronics (2013). Turbine Flowmeter Vision 1000. LICO Electronics GmbH, A-2320 Kledering. LICO Hungaria Kft, H-2030 Erd. LICO Mecatronic, RO-540526 Targu-Mures. Available at: www.platon-direct.eu.
McLaughlin, N. B., C. F. Drury, W. D. Reynolds, X.M. Yang, Y.X. Li, T. W. Welacky and G. Stewart (2008). Energy inputs for conservation and conventional primary tillage implements in a clay loam soil. Transactions of the ASABE 51, 1153–1163.
Natsis, A., G. Papadakis, and J.Pitsilis (1999). The Influence of Soil Type, Soil Water and Share Sharpness of a Mouldboard Plough on Energy Consumption, Rate of Work and Tillage Quality. J. Agric. Engng Res 72, 171-176.
Pang, S.N., G. C. Zoerb and G. Wang (1985). Tractor monitor based on indirect fuel measurement. Transactions of the ASAE 28, 994–998.
Schutte, B., L. Herrmann, M. Schreiber and H. D. Kutzbach ( 2004). Mapping Fuel Consumption. Additional Information on Precision Agriculture. Landtechnik 59, 152–153.
Siemens, J. C., and W. W. Bowers (1999). Machinery Management: How to Select Machinery to Fit the Real Needs of Farm Managers. Farm Business Management Series. Davenport, Iowa: John Deere Publishing.
Yule, I. J., G. Kohnen and M. Nowak (1999). A tractor performance monitor with DGPS capability. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 23, 155–174. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 281 PDF Download: 514 |
||
