IMPROVING IRRIGATION WATER CONVEYANCE AND DISTRIBUTION EFFICIENCY USING LINED CANALS AND BURIED PIPES UNDER EGYPTIAN CONDITION | ||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||
| Article 13, Volume 33, Issue 4, October 2016, Pages 1399-1420 PDF (707.09 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2016.97611 | ||
| Authors | ||
| E. A. M. Osman1; G. A. Bakeer2; M. E. Abuarab3; M. T. Eltantawy4 | ||
| 1B.Sc. Agric. Sci. (Soil Science) - Faculty of Agricultural - Cairo University, Egypt. | ||
| 2Professor of Agriculture Engineering - Faculty of Agricultural - Cairo University, Egypt. | ||
| 3Associate Professor of Agricultural Engineering - Faculty of Agric. - Cairo University, Egypt. | ||
| 4Head Research of Agriculture Engineering - Institute of Agriculture Engineering Research, Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| A field experiment was carried out at El-Mahmoudia command area at El-Beheira governorate, Egypt, during two growing seasons summer and winter 2014/2015, to Improve irrigation water conveyance efficiency using lined canal and upvc buried pipes under Egyptian conditions. The experiment consists of three types of on-field water distribution canals (Merwas); Earthen canal, Lined canal and Upvc buried pipes.Six Evaluation parameters were measured; conveyance efficiency, water saving, irrigation time, land saving, cropping intensity and crop yield, the financial analysis had been applied. The result showed that the conveyance efficiencies were 65%, 92.2% and 98.7% in winter, while the conveyance efficiencies were 59.6%, 87.1% and 98.7% in summer, for earthen canal, lined canal and buried pipes, respectively.The impact of development on reducing conveyance losses comparing with earthen canal were 68.1% and 96.3 for summer, while it was 77.7% and 96.3 for winter, under lined canal and upvc buried pipes, respectively. The impact of improvement on decreasing irrigation time was ranged from 50% to 60% for the different field crops. The benefits of land saving were about 0.8% of the total saved area after development by lined canal and 1.4% of the total command area saved after development by upvc buried pipes, it had become available for agriculture. The highest profit as a percent was obtained under maize, for both lined canal and buried pipes, respectively. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Conveyance efficiency; earthen canal; lined canal; buried pipes | ||
| References | ||
|
Akbar, S., Abbas, A., Hanjra, M.A. and Khan S. (2013). Structured analysis of seepage losses in irrigation supply channels for cost-effective investments: case studies from the southern Murray Darling Basin of Australia. Irrigation Science, vol. 31(1): 11-25.
Ali, M. H. (2011). Water Conveyance Loss and Designing Conveyance System.
Anonymous, (2014). Water Resources. State of the environment report. India International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. 3, Special Issue 4.
Arshad, M. and N. Ahmad. (2011). Performance assessment of irrigation system in rice and wheat cropping zone using modern techniques. ICID 21st International Congress on Irrigation and Drainage, 15-23 October 2011, Tehran,Iran
Bos, M. G.. (1989). Discharge Measurement Structures. Publication 20, International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen, The Netherlands, (3rd revised edition).
El-Kassar, G.M. (2007). Monitoring and Evaluation of Improved Irrigation Delivery System in W/10 Command Area, Egypt. Science Water Journal-NWRC-December.
FAO Aquastat. (2008).
Hvidt, M. (1998). Water, technology, and development: Upgrading Egypt’s irrigation system. London: Tauris Academic Studies.
Ibrahim, M.A. (2003). Some Aspects towards On-Farm Effective Irrigation Management”, Proc. of 7th Int. Water Technology Conf., Egypt.
INCID (1998). Pipe Distribution System for Irrigation. Indian National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage, New Delhi.
James, G. L., (1988): Principles of farm irrigation system design.John Wiley and Sons, Inc.( 85- 105 ): 543PP.
Javaid, F., Arshad, M., Azam, M., Shabbir, A. and Shakoor, A. (2012). Performance assessment of lined watercourses in district Jhang. Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 49(1):79-83
Kotb, T. and Boissevain, W. (2012). Water Saving Due to Irrigation Improvement in the Nile Delta. Lamaddalena N., Lebdi F., Todorovic M., Bogliotti C., Irrigation systems performance. CIHEAM, Bari, Pp. 85-98.
M. A. Sayed, (2014). “Impact of Lined Canals on Shallow Tube well Irrigation and Their Acceptability by the Farmers”. Institute of Water and Flood Management, BUET,. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 1 Issue 10,
Memon, A. A., K.Q. Leghari, A. F. H. Pathan, K. L. Khatri, S. A. Shah, K. K.Pinjani, R. Soomro and K. Ansari. (2013). Design and evaluation of Dadu canal lining for sustainable water saving. J. Water Reso.Protection. 5:689-98
M. Maniruzzaman, M. M. Alam, F. I. M. G. W. Sarkar, M. T. Islam, M. N. Islam. (2002). “Water Saving Techniques through Improved Water Distribution System in Deep Tubewell Area of Bangladesh”, Paper published in Online Journal of Biological Sciences 2 (3), , pp: 178-182.
Rahman, M., A. H. M. Kamal, A. A. Mamun and S. U. Miah. 2011.Study on the irrigation water distribution system developed by barind multipurpose development authority. Journal of Bangladesh Association of Young Resarchers 1(2):63-71
Sahu, P., Saxena, A. K., & Travadi, M. K. (2014). The Use of Canal Lining Available materials and Its Comparative Study”.IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering11 (3): 81-86
Sarki, A., Memon, S. Q and Leghari, M. 2008. Comparison of Different Methods for Computing Seepage Losses in an Earthen Watercourse. J. Agric, Tropica Et. Subtropica, 41 (4): 197-205.
Schwab, G.O., Fangmeier, D.D., Elliot, W.J. and Frevert, R.K. (1993). Soil and Water Conservation Engineering Fourth Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 463 PDF Download: 899 |
||
