DISTRIBUTION STRATEGIEY OF SOME CROPS IN EGYPT GOVERNORATES BY USING WATER FOOTPRINT ANALYSIS | ||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||
| Article 20, Volume 32, Issue 4, October 2015, Pages 1737-1760 PDF (3.29 M) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2015.97867 | ||
| Authors | ||
| M. H. Ramadan1; M. M. Ibrahim2; A. A. Khalil3 | ||
| 1Prof. of Ag. Eng., Ag. Eng. dept., Fac. of Ag., Mansoura Univ., Egypt. | ||
| 2Assist. Prof. of Ag. Eng., Ag. Eng. dept., Fac. of Ag., Mansoura Univ., Egypt. | ||
| 3Engineer, Ag. Eng. Res. Inst., Ag. Res. Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Egypt suffers from non-efficient irrigation water use and bad allocation of cropping areas among its governorates, in addition to its shortage water problems. Water footprint refers to the volume of water used to produce the crop, measured over the full planting time. Crops cultivated regardless of its water footprint which differ according to each governorate. Water footprint was conducted to enhance water use efficiency and recover water scarcity problems in Egypt.So in this study, total water footprint over the period from 2008 to 2012 was quantified for each governorate in Egypt for Rice, Maize and wheat crops from hydrological perspective. From results, it is recommended to plant Rice in Dakahlia, Kafr El-Sheikh and Damietta due to the lowest water footprint (1101.8, 1214.9 and 1280.3 m3/ton, respectively) and highest Rice yield. However, it is more profitable to plant Maize in Dakahlia and Noubaria as they have the lowest values of water footprint (1227.4 and 1399.5 m3/ton, respectively) and highest yield. With respect to Wheat crop, it was found that, the best governorates to be planted were Behera, Dakahlia, Damietta and Kafer El-shiekh where the values of water footprint were1323.1, 1323.3, 1378.1 and 1387.1 m3/ton, respectively as the yield was high in the previous governorates. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| water footprint; green water footprint; blue water footprint; total water footprint; Rice; Maize; Wheat; Egypt | ||
| References | ||
|
Aldaya. M.M and M.R. Llamas, (2008). Water footprint analysis for the Guadiana river basin. Available at: http://www. waterfootprint.org/ Reports/Report35.pdf. Accessed on 10 Feb 2013. Value of water research report series No (35), pp 1-8.
Allen, R. G.; L. S. Pereira; D. Raes; and M. Smith. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Food and Agriculture Organization. Rome.
Bulsink, F., A. Hoekstra, M.J. Booij, (2010). The water footprint of Indonesian provinces related to the consumption of crop products. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. (14), PP 119–128.
Chapagain, A. K. and A. Y. Hoekstra. (2004). Water footprints of nations. Available at: www. waterfootprint.org /Reports/ Report 16 Vol1.pdf. Accessed on 30 Feb 2013, Value of Water Research Report Series No (16), Pages 80, UNESCO-IHE, and Delft, Netherlands.
Chapagain, A.K. and A.Y. Hoekstra. (2003). Virtual water trade: A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international trade of livestock and livestock products. In: Hoekstra (ED) .Virtual water trade: Proceedings of the International Expert Meeting on Virtual Water Trade. Value of Water Research Report Series No. (12), pages 248, UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, the Netherlands.
FAO (2003). Technical Conversion Factors for Agricultural Commodities. Available at: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/ess/documents /methodology/tcf.pdf. Accessed on: 30 Sep 2014.page 1:728.
Felix, G. (2012). The Swiss Water Footprint Report: A global picture of Swiss water dependence. Pages 36. Available at: http://www.WWF-SDC-2012 Swiss water footprint.pdf. Accessed on 23 Feb 2013.
Gerbens-Leenes P. W.; and A.Y. Hoekstra. (2008). Business water footprint accounting: A tool to assess how production of goods and services impacts. Available at: http://www.waterfootprin t.org/Reports/Report27 .Accessed on 21 Sep 2014.
Hoekstra, A.Y., A.K. Chapagain, M.M. Aldaya, and M.M. Mekonnen. (2011). The water footprint assessment manual. Available at:http://www.waterfootprint.org/downloads/ Accessed on 25 Jan.2013. Water Footprint Network 2011.Pages 228.
Hoekstra, A. Y. and P. Q. Hung. (2005). Globalisation of water resources: international virtual water flows in relation to crop trade, Global Environmental Change 15(1), PP 45-56.
Hoekstra, A.Y. and P.Q. Hung. (2002). A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade. Value of Water Research Report Series No (11), PP 1-120, UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, the Netherlands.
Liu, J. and H.H.G. Savenije, (2008). Food consumption patterns and their effect on water requirement in China. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. (12), PP 887–898.
Mekonnen, M.M. (2011). Spatially and temporally explicit water footprint accounting. Available at: http://doc.utwente.nl/78027/1/thesis_ MM_Mekonnen.pdf. Accessed 3. Feb.2013.
USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) and MSU Extension Service Staff. (1990). Irrigation Water Management When and How Much to Irrigate.Pages: 6. (Soil & Water) MT8901 AG Available at: http://animalrangeextension.montana.edu/articles/forage/crop_irrigation.pdf Accessed 13. Sep .2013.
Van Oel, P., M. Mekonnen, and A. Hoekstra, (2009). The external water footprint of the Netherlands: geographically-explicit quantification and impact assessment. Ecol. Econ. (69), PP 82–92.
Verma, S., D.A. Kampman, P. van der Zaag, A.Y. Hoekstra, (2009). Going against the flow: a critical analysis of inter-state virtual water trade in the context of India’s National River Linking Program. Physical Chemical Earth 34, PP 261–269 | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 189 PDF Download: 278 |
||
