THE EFFECT OF IRRIGATION FREQUENCY AND RATE UNDER TRICKLE IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT ON YIELD GREEN BEAN GROWN IN CLAY LOAM SOIL | ||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||
| Article 23, Volume 33, Issue 2, April 2016, Pages 733-750 PDF (791.87 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2016.98016 | ||
| Authors | ||
| S.M. Hafez1; M.M. Shaheen2; M. S. Abuarab3 | ||
| 1B.SC. of Agriculture Eng. - Faculty of Agric. - Cairo Univ., Egypt. | ||
| 2Professor of Vegetable - Faculty of Agric. - Cairo Univ., Egypt. | ||
| 3Associate Professor of Agriculture Eng. - Faculty of Agric. - Cairo Univ., Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| This study was conducted over 2 years (2013 and 2014) to establish the optimal combinations between irrigation frequency and rate for trickle-irrigated green bean using water production functions and water use– yield relationships. A field experiment was conducted using a randomized complete block design with three irrigation frequencies (F1, F2 and F3, irrigation events once every 1, 2and 3 days, respectively) and three trickle irrigation rates (I1: 1.00, I2: 0.80, and I3: 0.60 of the estimated evapotranspiration, ET). Our results show that yield variables and water use efficiencies (WUEs) increased with increasing irrigation frequency and rate, with non-significant differences between F1 and F2 in yield variables and between I1 and I2 in WUEs. Moreover, the combination between various irrigation frequencies and rates had an important effect on yield variables and WUEs, with the highest values being found with F1I2 and F2 I1 and the lowest for F2I3 and F3I3. The F1I3 treatment had grain yield and yield components values similar to those obtained for the F2I3 treatments and WUEs values similar to those obtained for the F2I3 and F3I1 treatments. Production functions of yield versus seasonal crop ET were linear for all combinations of irrigation frequency and rate and for all irrigation frequency treatments with the exception of the F1 treatment, which instead showed a second order relationship. In conclusion, we identified the optimal coupling combinations between irrigation frequency and water application rate to achieve the maximum yield and WUEs. | ||
| References | ||
|
Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., Smith, M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration: guide lines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drain. Pp. 56. UNFAO, Rome.
Alvino, A., Tedeschi, P., Zerbi, G., 1988. Growth, flowering, setting and yield of kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as influenced by water regime, P fertilization and bnoa treatment. Acta Hort. 228, 219–226.
ASAE. 1996a. Field Evaluation of Micro Irrigation Systems. EP405.1. ASAE Standards. Amer. Soc. Agric. Engr., St. Joseph, MI, pp. 756–759.
ASAE. 1996b. Design and Installation of Micro Irrigation Systems. EP409. ASAE Standards. Amer. Soc. Agric. Engr., St. Joseph, MI, pp. 792–797.
Assouline, S., 2002. The effects of micro drip and conventional drip irrigation on
Barros, L.C.G., Hanks, R.J., 1993. Evapotranspiration and yield of beans as affected by mulch and irrigation. Agron. J. 85, 692–697.
Bergez, J.E., Deumier, J.M., Lacroix, B., Leroy, P., Wallach, D. 2002. Improving irrigation schedules by using a biophysical and a decisional model. Eur. J. Agron. 16, 123–135.
Borosic, J., Romic, D., Dolanjski, D., 2000. Growth and yield components of dwarf French bean grown under irrigation conditions. Acta Hort. 533, 451–459.
Boutraa, T., Sanders, F.E., 2001. Influence of water stress on grain yield and vegetative growth of two cultivars of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 187, 251–257.
C¸ag˘lar, G., 1998.In: Kahramanmaras kos， ullarında ikinci u¨ ru¨n olarak yes， il fasulye yetis， tiricilig˘ine uygun yer ve sırık c¸es， itlerin belirlenmesi u¨ zerine bir aras， tırma. II. Sebze Tarımı Sempozyumu. Gaziosmanpas， a U¨ niv. Zir. Fak, Tokat, 28–30 Eylu¨ l, (in Turkish), pp. s: 199–s:204.
Chen, C., Payne, W.A., Smiley, R.W., Stoltz, M.A., 2003. Yield and water-use efficiency of eight wheat cultivars planted on seven dates in northeastern Oregon. Agron J. 95, 836–843.
Costa, J. M., Ortu˜no, M. F., Chaves, M. M. 2007. Deficit irrigation as a strategy to save water: physiology and potential application to horticulture. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 49, 1421–1434.
Doorenbos, J., Kassam, A.H., 1979. Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33. UN-FAO, Rome, Italy.
El-Hendawy, S.E., Abd El-Lattief, E.A., Ahmed, A.S., Schmidhalter, U. 2008. Irrigation rate and plant density effects on yield and water use efficiency of drip-irrigated corn. Agric. Water Manage. 95, 836–844.
El-Hendawy, S.E., Hokam, E.M., Schmidhalter, U., 2008. Drip irrigation frequency: the effects and their interaction with nitrogen fertilization on sandy soil water distribution, maize yield and water use efficiency under Egyptian conditions. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 194, 180–192.
English, M. J. 1990. Deficit irrigation: an analytical framework. J. ASCE (IR). 116: 399-412.
English, M., Raja, S. N. 1996.Perspective on deficit irrigation. Agric. Water Management 32, 1–14.
Eric, S., David, S., Robert, H. 2004. To pulse or not to pulse trickle irrigation that is the question UF/IFAS - Horticultural Sciences Department. Florida, USA NFREC-SV-Vegetarian (04-05).
Ertek, A., S¸ensoy, S., Ku¨ c¸u¨ kyumuk, C., Gedik, I., 2004. Irrigation frequency and
Fereres, E., Soriano, M.A. 2007. Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use J. Exp. Bot. 58, 147–159.
Heerman, D.F. 1985. ET in irrigation management. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Advances in Evapotranspiration. Trans. ASAE. Pp. 323–334.
Hillel, D. 1972. The relationship between field water balance and water use efficiency. In: Hillel D(Ed) Optimizing the Soil Physical Environment Toward Greater Crop Yields (pp. 79-100) Academic Press, New York.
Howell, T.A., Cuenca, R.H., Solomon, K.H., 1990. Crop yield response. In: Hoffman, G.J., Howell, T.A., Solomon, K.H. (Eds.), Management of Farm Irrigation Systems. ASAE Monograph No. 9, 2950 Niles Road, St. Joseph, MI, pp. 93–122.
Istanbulluoglu, A. 2009. Effects of irrigation regimes on yield and water productivity of safflower (Carthamustinctorius L.) under Mediterranean climatic conditions. Agric. Water Manage. 96, 1792–1798.
Jackson, M. L. 1973. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice hall, Inc. N.Y.
Jones, H., 2004. Irrigation scheduling advantages and pitfalls of plant based methods.
Kanber, R., Yazar, A., O¨ nder, S., Ko¨ ksal, H. 1993. Irrigation response of Pistachio. Irrig. Sci. 14, 1–14.
Kirda, C. 2002. Deficit irrigation scheduling based on plant growth stages showing water stress tolerance. Deficit irrigation practices. In: FAO Corp. Doc. Rep. 22, Rome, pp. 3–10.
Kirnak, H., Demirtas, M.N., 2006. Effects of different irrigation regimes and mulches on yield and macro nutrition levels of drip-irrigated cucumber under open field conditions. J. Plant Nutr. 29, 1675–1690.
Kirnak, H., Gencoglan, C., Degirmenci, V., 2003. Effect of deficit irrigation on yield and growth of second crop corn in Harran plain conditions. Atatu¨ rk Univ. J. Fac. Agric. 34 (2), 117–123.
Kriedemann, P.E., Goodwin, I. 2003. Regulated Deficit Irrigation and Partial Root-zone Drying. An Overview of Principles and Applications. Irrigation Insights no. 3.Land and Water, Australia.
Merriam, J. L. 1965. A management control concept for detonating the economical frequency of irrigation. ASAE Annual Meeting, Paper No. 65-206, St Joseph, Michigan.
Moon, D., Gulik, W.V., 1996. Irrigation scheduling using GIS. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Scheduling, Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., San Antonio, TX, USA, November 3–6, pp. 644–649.
Muirhead, W.A., 1978. Snap beans. Farmers Newsletter. 144, 24–25.
Musick, J.T., Jones, O.R., Stewart, B.A., Dusek, D.A., 1994. Water–yield relationships for irrigated and dryland wheat in the U.S. Southern Plains. Agron. J. 86, 980– 986.
Oweis, T., Hachum, A. 2001. Reducing peak supplemental irrigation demand by tending sowing dates. Agric. Water Manage. 50, 109–124.
Patanè, C., Cosentino, S.L. 2010. Effects of soil water deficit on yield and quality of processing tomato under a Mediterranean climate. Agric. Water Manage. 97, 131–138.
Payero, J.O., Melvin, S.R., Irmak, S., Tarkalson, D., 2006. Yield response of corn to deficit irrigation in a semiarid climate. Agric. Water Manage. 84, 101–112.
Phene, C.J., Sanders, D.C. 1976. High-frequency trickle irrigation and row spacing effects on yield and quality of potatoes. Agron. J. 68, 602–607.
Stanghellini, C., Kempkes, F.L.K., Knies, P. 2003. Enhancing environmental quality in agricultural systems. Acta Hortic. 609, 277–283. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 130 PDF Download: 194 |
||
