IMPROVING THE PERFORMANCE OF MICRO SPRINKLERS IRRIGATION BY REDUCING ITS RANDOM MOTION | ||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||
| Article 17, Volume 32, Issue 2, April 2015, Pages 671-686 PDF (1.12 M) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2015.98622 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Adel M. Elmetwalli1; M. A. Bek2 | ||
| 1Assi. Prof., Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Tanta Univ., Egypt. | ||
| 2Assi. Prof. Phys. and Eng. Math. Dept., Fac. of Eng, Tanta Univ., Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Limited fresh water resources become a serious issue worldwide particularly arid and semi-arid conditions. Therefore more efficient irrigation systems are fundamentally required to increase water productivity. Micro sprinklers are among these new systems to maximize irrigation efficiency. Random motion of micro sprinklers head reduces the uniformity of water. This study aimed to improve water distribution efficiency of micro sprinklers by reducing its random motion. The study investigated the effects of operating pressure, sprinkler height on the performance of micro sprinklers before and after modification. Irrigation system was operated at four different levels of operating pressure (150, 180, 220 and 250 kPa) and three different sprinkler heights of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 m. Water distribution efficiency was evaluated through the calculation of Christiansen’s uniformity coefficient (CCU) and distribution uniformity (DU). The highest CCU and DU values of 91.8% and 86% were recorded with 250 kPa operating pressure, and 1.5 m sprinkler height when using copper support followed by same conditions when using PVC tubes. Therefore, sprinklers without support produced less water distribution efficiency in comparison to cases of copper and PVC tubes. The results thus revealed that water distribution efficiency can be maximized through reducing random motion of sprinkler head and choosing the optimum operating conditions (e.g. operating pressure and sprinkler height). | ||
| Keywords | ||
| micro-sprinklers; operating pressure; height; distribution uniformity; random motion | ||
| References | ||
|
Anderson, J. D. (1995). Computational fluid dynamics: the basics with applications (McGraw-Hill international editions. Mechanical engineering series).
Armindo, R.A.; T.A. Botrel, and T.C. Garzella (2011). Flow rate sprinkler development for site specific irrigation. Irrigation Science, 29: 233-240.
ASAE (2001). American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Test procedure for determining the uniformity of water distribution of center pivot and lateral move irrigation machines equipped with spray or sprinkler nozzles. ASAE Standards, ANSI/ASAE S436.
Aung, K.H. and F.S. Thomas (2003). Introduction to micro-irrigation. North Dakota State University, NDSU Extension Service. AE-1243, March 2003.
Dechmi, F.; E. Playan; J.M. Faci; M. Tejero and A. Bercero (2003). Analysis of an irrigation district in northeastern Spain. II Irrigation evaluation, simulation and scheduling. Agric. Water Manage., 61: 93-109.
English, M.J.; M. Asce and G.S. Nuss (1982). Designing for deficit irrigation. Irrigation and drainage Division, ASCE, 108: 91-106.
Heermann, D. F; W. W. Wallender and G. M. Bos (1990).Irrigation efficiency and uniformity. (C. F. Hoffman, G. J., Howell, T. A., Solomon, K. H. (Eds.), Management of Farm Irrigation Systems. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI. 125-149.
Li, J. and M. Rao (2000). Sprinkler water distribution as affected by winter wheat canopy. Irrigation Science, 20: 29-35.
Malalalsekera, W. and H. K. Versteeg (2007). An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: the finite volume method Harlow: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Melvyn, K. (1983). Sprinkler irrigation, equipment and practice. Batsford Academic and Educational, London pp.120.
Rijsberman, F.R. (2006). Water scarcity: fact or fiction? Agric. Water Manag., 80: 5-22.
Shendage, A.S. and Gadge, S.B. (2011). Hydraulic studies of different microsprinkler. IJAEB, 4(1): 73-76.
Wei, Q.; Y. Shi; W. Dong; J. Lu and S. Huang (2006). Study on hydraulic performance of drip emitters by computational fluid dynamics. Agric. Water Manag., 84(1–2): p. 130-136 | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 180 PDF Download: 272 |
||
